Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, 195 Little Albany Street, New Brunswick, NJ, 08903, USA.
Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2020 Apr 23;21(5):42. doi: 10.1007/s11864-020-00745-9.
Older adults with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), commonly defined as age ≥ 60 years, represent approximately 20% of the total HL population. Historically, they have significantly inferior outcomes compared with younger patients. The cause of this is multifactorial, including biologic differences (e.g., mixed cellularity and EBV-related disease); high incidence of advanced stage disease; and frequency of comorbidities and decreased organ reserve leading to poorer tolerability of therapy with increased toxicity, including treatment-related mortality. Pretreatment evaluation for older HL patients should entail a geriatric assessment (GA), with evaluation of functional status and comorbidities (e.g., geriatric cumulative illness rating scale, CIRS-G) to determine fitness. Furthermore, treatment selection should be based in part on GA, with fit older patients receiving curative chemotherapy-based regimens and unfit or frail patients considering less intensive or non-chemotherapy-based platforms. Additionally, there may be consideration for pre-phase of therapy (e.g., pulse steroids) in order to improve performance status. The inclusion of anthracycline therapy appears important, while bleomycin-containing regimens (e.g., ABVD) may be associated with prohibitive pulmonary toxicity, and intensive therapies such as BEACOPP are too toxic. benefit ratio/benefit ratio, a priori omission of bleomycin may also be considered (i.e., AVD), especially for patients older than 70 years of age. In addition, newer regimens for older HL patients integrating novel therapeutic agents into frontline treatment have emerged as effective and tolerable options. Data incorporating brentuximab vedotin sequentially before and after AVD chemotherapy represent the best-reported outcomes in older HL patients to date. In the relapsed/refractory setting, salvage chemotherapy regimens followed by autologous stem cell transplantation should be considered for fit patients, while less intensive treatment, including the use of novel targeted agents, is an option for unfit or frail patients. In this review, we examine the epidemiology, importance of GA, and current treatment options for older HL patients.
老年霍奇金淋巴瘤(HL)患者通常定义为年龄≥60 岁,占 HL 患者总数的 20%左右。与年轻患者相比,他们的预后明显较差。造成这种情况的原因有很多,包括生物学差异(例如混合细胞性和 EBV 相关疾病);晚期疾病发病率高;合并症的发生频率高,以及器官储备减少,导致治疗耐受性降低,毒性增加,包括治疗相关死亡率。对老年 HL 患者进行治疗前评估时应进行老年综合评估(GA),评估功能状态和合并症(例如,老年累积疾病评分量表,CIRS-G)以确定患者的身体状况。此外,治疗选择部分应基于 GA,身体状况良好的老年患者应接受基于化疗的治愈性治疗方案,而身体状况不佳或虚弱的患者应考虑接受强度较低或非化疗的治疗方案。此外,可能需要考虑治疗前阶段(例如,脉冲类固醇)以改善功能状态。含蒽环类药物的治疗方案似乎很重要,而含博来霉素的方案(例如 ABVD)可能与不可接受的肺毒性相关,而高强度治疗方案(如 BEACOPP)毒性太大。在这种情况下,预先不使用博来霉素可能也是一种考虑(即 AVD),特别是对于年龄大于 70 岁的患者。此外,将新型治疗药物纳入一线治疗的新型老年 HL 患者治疗方案已成为有效且可耐受的选择。在包含 AVD 化疗前后序贯使用 Brentuximab vedotin 的研究数据代表了迄今为止老年 HL 患者最佳报告的结果。在复发/难治性患者中,适合患者应考虑使用挽救化疗方案,随后进行自体干细胞移植,而不适合高强度治疗的患者可以选择强度较低的治疗方案,包括使用新型靶向药物。在这篇综述中,我们探讨了老年 HL 患者的流行病学、GA 的重要性以及当前的治疗选择。