Department of Orthodontics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Dentistry, Houston, TX, USA.
Head Face Med. 2013 Oct 9;9:28. doi: 10.1186/1746-160X-9-28.
To measure surface skin dose from various cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scanners using point-dosimeters.
MATERIALS & METHODS: A head anthropomorphic phantom was used with nanoDOT optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dosimeters (Landauer Corp., Glenwood, IL) attached to various anatomic landmarks. The phantom was scanned using multiple exposure protocols for craniofacial evaluations in three different CBCT units and a conventional x-ray imaging system. The dosimeters were calibrated for each of the scan protocols on the different imaging systems. Peak skin dose and surface doses at the eye lens, thyroid, submandibular and parotid gland levels were measured.
The measured skin doses ranged from 0.09 to 4.62 mGy depending on dosimeter positions and imaging systems. The average surface doses to the lens locations were ~4.0 mGy, well below the threshold for cataractogenesis (500 mGy). The results changed accordingly with x-ray tube output (mAs and kV) and also were sensitive to scan field of view (SFOV). As compared to the conventional panoramic and cephalometric imaging system, doses from all three CBCT systems were at least an order of magnitude higher.
Peak skin dose and surface doses at the eye lens, thyroid, and salivary gland levels measured from the CBCT imaging systems were lower than the thresholds to induce deterministic effects. However, our findings do not justify the routine use of CBCT imaging in orthodontics considering the lifetime-attributable risk to the individual.
使用点剂量仪测量来自不同锥形束 CT(CBCT)扫描仪的表面皮肤剂量。
采用头部人体模型,使用纳米 DOT 光激励发光(OSL)剂量计(LandauerCorp.,Glenwood,IL)贴附于各种解剖标志点。对该模型进行了扫描,采用多种曝光方案,对三种不同的 CBCT 设备和一种常规 X 射线成像系统进行颅面评估。为不同的成像系统中的每个扫描方案对剂量计进行了校准。测量了在不同的成像系统中,皮肤峰值剂量和眼晶状体、甲状腺、颌下腺和腮腺水平的表面剂量。
根据剂量计位置和成像系统的不同,测量的皮肤剂量范围为 0.09 至 4.62 mGy。晶状体位置的平均表面剂量约为 4.0 mGy,远低于白内障形成阈值(500 mGy)。结果随 X 射线管输出(mA 和 kV)而变化,也对扫描视野(SFOV)敏感。与常规全景和头颅测量成像系统相比,所有三种 CBCT 系统的剂量至少高出一个数量级。
从 CBCT 成像系统测量的皮肤峰值剂量和眼晶状体、甲状腺和唾液腺水平的表面剂量低于诱发确定性效应的阈值。然而,考虑到个体的终生归因风险,我们的发现并不能证明在正畸中常规使用 CBCT 成像的合理性。