Department of Forest Science, FSL 020, Oregon State University, 97331-7501, Corvallis, OR, USA.
Theor Appl Genet. 1993 Jun;86(5):605-11. doi: 10.1007/BF00838716.
We analyzed mitochondrial (mt) DNA restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs) associated with cytochrome oxidase, subunit I (coxI)-related gene sequences in 268 trees derived from 19 natural populations of three species of pines from California (USA): Monterey pine (Pinus radiata D. Don), bishop pine (P. Muricata D. Don), and knobcone pine (P. attenuata Lemm.). Total genomic DNA was digested with four restriction endonucleases and probed with a 750-bp fragment of the mitochondrialcoxI gene amplified fromP. attenuata via the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). ThecoxI gene is repeated at least 4 times in some populations, and all variants that we observed resulted from complex rearrangements rather than from point mutations. There was limited intrapopulation variation, but strong differentiation among populations. When applied to haplotype frequencies, Nei's gene diversity within populations (Hs) averaged 7% (±3), and Gst varied from 75% forP. Radiata to 96% forP. muricata. The high degree of population differentiation for mtDNA suggests that it can be a powerful marker of population differences, but its rapid rate of structural evolution appears to result from recombination among a limited number of repetitive elements-giving frequent homoplasious fragment phenotypes. The phylogenetic trees disagreed with results from chloroplast DNA, nuclear gene, and morphological studies.
我们分析了线粒体(mt)DNA 限制片段长度多态性(RFLPs)与细胞色素氧化酶亚基 I(coxI)相关基因序列的关系,这些序列来自加利福尼亚州(美国)三种松树的 19 个自然种群:辐射松(Pinus radiata D. Don)、主教松(P. Muricata D. Don)和 knobcone 松(P. attenuata Lemm.)。总基因组 DNA 用四种限制内切酶消化,并用从 P. attenuata 通过聚合酶链反应(PCR)扩增的线粒体 coxI 基因的 750bp 片段作为探针。coxI 基因在一些种群中至少重复 4 次,我们观察到的所有变体都是复杂重排的结果,而不是点突变的结果。种群内的变异有限,但种群间存在强烈的分化。当应用于单倍型频率时,种群内的 Nei 基因多样性(Hs)平均为 7%(±3),Gst 从辐射松的 75%到主教松的 96%不等。线粒体 DNA 的高度种群分化表明它可以成为种群差异的有力标记,但它的结构进化速度很快,似乎是由于有限数量的重复元件之间的重组导致的,这导致频繁出现同态片段表型。系统发育树与叶绿体 DNA、核基因和形态学研究的结果不一致。