Suppr超能文献

多TI脉冲动脉自旋标记中Q2TIPS团注饱和的磁化传递效应建模

Modeling magnetization transfer effects of Q2TIPS bolus saturation in multi-TI pulsed arterial spin labeling.

作者信息

Petr Jan, Schramm Georg, Hofheinz Frank, Langner Jens, van den Hoff Jörg

机构信息

Department of Positron Emission Tomography, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.

出版信息

Magn Reson Med. 2014 Oct;72(4):1007-14. doi: 10.1002/mrm.25011. Epub 2013 Nov 5.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To estimate the relaxation time changes during Q2TIPS bolus saturation caused by magnetization transfer effects and to propose and evaluate an extended model for perfusion quantification which takes this into account.

METHOD

Three multi inversion-time pulsed arterial spin labeling sequences with different bolus saturation duration were acquired for five healthy volunteers. Magnetization transfer exchange rates in tissue and blood were obtained from control image saturation recovery. Cerebral blood flow (CBF) obtained using the extended model and the standard model was compared.

RESULTS

A decrease of obtained CBF of 6% (10%) was observed in grey matter when the duration of bolus saturation increased from 600 to 900 ms (1200 ms). This decrease was reduced to 1.6% (2.8%) when the extended quantification model was used. Compared with the extended model, the standard model underestimated CBF in grey matter by 9.7, 15.0, and 18.7% for saturation durations 600, 900, and 1200 ms, respectively. Results for simulated single inversion-time data showed 5-16% CBF underestimation depending on blood arrival time and bolus saturation duration.

CONCLUSION

Magnetization transfer effects caused by bolus saturation pulses should not be ignored when performing quantification as they can cause appreciable underestimation of the CBF.

摘要

目的

评估在Q2TIPS团注饱和期间由磁化传递效应引起的弛豫时间变化,并提出和评估一种考虑到这一因素的灌注定量扩展模型。

方法

为五名健康志愿者采集了三个具有不同团注饱和持续时间的多反转时间脉冲动脉自旋标记序列。从对照图像饱和恢复中获得组织和血液中的磁化传递交换率。比较了使用扩展模型和标准模型获得的脑血流量(CBF)。

结果

当团注饱和持续时间从600毫秒增加到900毫秒(1200毫秒)时,灰质中获得的CBF下降了6%(10%)。当使用扩展定量模型时,这种下降减少到1.6%(2.8%)。与扩展模型相比,对于600、900和1200毫秒的饱和持续时间,标准模型分别低估了灰质中的CBF 9.7%、15.0%和18.7%。模拟单反转时间数据的结果显示,根据血液到达时间和团注饱和持续时间,CBF低估了5-16%。

结论

在进行定量分析时,不应忽略团注饱和脉冲引起的磁化传递效应,因为它们可能会导致CBF明显低估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验