Murray-Darling Freshwater Research Centre, P.O. Box 921, 2640, Albury, New South Wales, Australia.
Microb Ecol. 1991 Dec;22(1):27-52. doi: 10.1007/BF02540211.
Billabongs, lentic waterbodies common to the floodplain of Australian rivers, differ considerably from the lotic riverine environment in terms of hydrology, physiochemical characteristics, and biological assemblages present. As little is known regarding the bacterial ecology of billabong habitats, a comparison was made of the bacterial assemblages in the water column of seven paired river/billabong sites in the Murray-Darling Basin of southeastern Australia. Billabongs supported larger populations of bacteria (1-157×10(9) cells liter(-1); 11-10,270 μg C liter(-1)) than did rivers (1-10×10(9) cells liter(-1); 6-143 μg C liter(-1)). Phospholipid analyses confirmed that billabongs (14-111 μg phospholipid fatty acid liter(-1)) had larger bacterial populations than rivers (<12 μg liter(-1)). Bacterial production, measured with(3)H-leucine, was also greater in billabongs (0.28-3.05 μg C liter(-1) hour(-1)) than rivers (0.05-0.62 μg C liter(-1) hour(-1)). Production calculated from the frequency of dividing cells confirmed this conclusion, and suggested bacterial production in some billabongs could exceed 100 μg C liter(-1) hour(-1). An INT-formazan method indicated that usually <25% of bacterial cells were active in either habitat, but this was probably an underestimate of the bona fide value. Turnover times of glucose were usually shorter in billabongs, and the cell-specific activity greater for billabong than river assemblages. The factors most likely to be responsible for the differences between the bacterial assemblages in rivers and billabongs relate to hydrological regime and the availability of organic carbon substrates.
澳大利亚河流洪泛区特有的牛轭湖等静态水体在水文学、理化特性和生物组合方面与动态河流环境有很大的不同。由于对牛轭湖生境的细菌生态学知之甚少,因此对澳大利亚东南部墨累-达令盆地的 7 对河/牛轭湖地点的水柱细菌组合进行了比较。与河流相比,牛轭湖中的细菌数量更大(1-157×10(9) 个细胞/升;11-10,270μg C/升)(1-10×10(9) 个细胞/升;6-143μg C/升)。磷脂分析证实,与河流相比,牛轭湖的细菌数量更大(14-111μg 磷脂脂肪酸/升)(<12μg 升(-1))。用(3)H-亮氨酸测量的细菌生产力在牛轭湖中也更高(0.28-3.05μg C/升小时(-1))比河流(0.05-0.62μg C/升小时(-1))。从分裂细胞的频率计算得出的产量证实了这一结论,并表明一些牛轭湖中的细菌产量可能超过 100μg C/升小时(-1)。INT-甲瓒法表明,通常情况下,两种生境中的细菌细胞活跃性<25%,但这可能低估了真实值。葡萄糖的周转率通常在牛轭湖中较短,并且比河流生物组合具有更高的细胞特异性活性。造成河流和牛轭湖细菌组合差异的因素最可能与水文学状况和有机碳底物的可利用性有关。