Bunn Stuart E, Boon Paul I
Centre for Catchment and In-Stream Research, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Griffith University, 4111, Nathan, Queensland, Australia.
Murray-Darling Freshwater Research Centre, P.O. Box 921, 2641, Albury, New South Wales, Australia.
Oecologia. 1993 Oct;96(1):85-94. doi: 10.1007/BF00318034.
We used the stable isotopes of carbon and nitrogen to examine the food webs of three small flood-plain lakes (billabongs) in south-eastern Australia. With few exceptions, stable carbon isotope analysis could not be used to discriminate among the conspicuous potential sources of fringing, emergent or floating vegetation or benthic detritus. These primary sources showed little spatial or temporal variation in δC values, with means ranging from-28.5 to-26.8‰ in spring and-29.1 to-25.4‰ in late summer. Submerged vegetation had similar δC values to the above sources in spring but showed greater spatial variation and were less C-depleted, considerably so in some species, in late summer. Epiphytes and algae were C-depleted in spring compared with the other primary sources but became more C-enriched in late summer. Mean δC values for primary and secondary consumers were not only far more variable (-37.4 to-22.7‰) but in general were more negative than the potential food sources, particularly in spring. Using the combined information from stable carbon and nitrogen isotope analysis, we could narrow down the list of potential primary sources driving food webs in these billabongs. The freshwater crayfish (Cherax) was one of the few taxa that appeared to obtain its biomass carbon from detrital material. Gastropods and leptocerid caddis larvae on emergent or submerged vegetation obtained a mixture of carbon from epiphytes and macrophytes; in both taxa, epiphytes contributed more to biomass carbon than did the macrophytes. However, other common grazers and collector/gatherers sampled from macrophytes, e.g. baetid mayflies, chironomid larvae and atyid shrimps, were often too C-depleted even to have derived their biomass carbon solely from epiphytes. Many other primary consumers, including zooplankton, and mussels (Velesunio), and most of the secondary consumers, including water mites (Hydracarina), phantom midge larvae (Chaoborus) and fish, were also C-depleted. The enormous biomass of littoral and fringing vegetation could contribute to metazoan food webs in these billabongs only if an additional highly C-depleted source was consumed simultaneously. Methane released from billabong sediments could provide such a C-depleted carbon source that is re-introduced into metazoan food webs via the consumption of methanotrophic bacteria. Alternatively, food webs in these water bodies are largely driven by an unknown and inconspicuous C-depleted primary producer, such as planktonic Chlorophyta.
我们利用碳和氮的稳定同位素来研究澳大利亚东南部三个小型漫滩湖(死水潭)的食物网。除了少数例外情况,稳定碳同位素分析无法用于区分边缘、挺水或漂浮植被或底栖碎屑等明显的潜在来源。这些主要来源的δC值在空间和时间上变化很小,春季平均值在-28.5‰至-26.8‰之间,夏末在-29.1‰至-25.4‰之间。沉水植被在春季的δC值与上述来源相似,但在夏末显示出更大的空间变化,且碳亏损程度较小,某些物种的情况尤为明显。与其他主要来源相比,附生植物和藻类在春季碳亏损,但在夏末碳富集程度增加。初级和次级消费者的平均δC值不仅变化大得多(-37.4‰至-22.7‰),而且总体上比潜在食物来源更负,尤其是在春季。利用稳定碳和氮同位素分析的综合信息,我们可以缩小驱动这些死水潭食物网的潜在主要来源清单。淡水小龙虾(Cherax)是少数几个似乎从碎屑物质中获取生物量碳的类群之一。在挺水或沉水植被上的腹足类动物和细角石蛾幼虫从附生植物和大型植物中获取碳的混合物;在这两个类群中,附生植物对生物量碳的贡献比大型植物更大。然而,从大型植物上采样的其他常见食草动物和收集者/采集者,如短脉石蝇、摇蚊幼虫和阿蒂虾,其碳亏损程度往往过大,以至于其生物量碳不可能仅来自附生植物。许多其他初级消费者,包括浮游动物和贻贝(Velesunio),以及大多数次级消费者,包括水螨(Hydracarina)、幽蚊幼虫(Chaoborus)和鱼类,也都存在碳亏损。只有同时消耗另一种高度碳亏损的来源,沿岸和边缘植被的巨大生物量才能对这些死水潭中的后生动物食物网做出贡献。从死水潭沉积物中释放的甲烷可以提供这样一种碳亏损的碳源,它通过甲烷营养细菌的消耗重新进入后生动物食物网。或者,这些水体中的食物网在很大程度上由一种未知且不显眼的碳亏损初级生产者驱动,例如浮游绿藻。