Suppr超能文献

语言学家与非语言学家在语法可接受性直觉方面的差异。

Differences between linguists and nonlinguists in intuitions of grammaticality-acceptability.

作者信息

Spencer N J

机构信息

Psychology Department, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

J Psycholinguist Res. 1973 Jun;2(2):83-98. doi: 10.1007/BF01067203.

Abstract

Modern transformational grammarians, using only their own intuitions as the basic data for rule construction, may not be analyzing the common, natural language of the speech community. Do native speakers share the intuitions of linguists? One hundred and fifty exemplar sentences from 6 linguists' articles were presented to 43 linguistically naive and 22 linguistically nonnaive native speakers. Native speakers agreed among themselves as to the acceptability or unacceptability of 80% of the sentences. Subjects shared intuitions with linguists in only a half of the exemplars. It is suggested that linguists consult nonlinguists as to the acceptability of exemplars, which illustrate the rules proposed, as a check that those rules reflect the formal structure of the common language being described.

摘要

现代转换生成语法学家仅将自身直觉作为构建规则的基本数据,他们可能并未分析言语社区的通用自然语言。以英语为母语的人是否与语言学家有相同的直觉呢?从6位语言学家的文章中选取了150个例句,呈现给43位未接触过语言学知识的母语者和22位有语言学基础的母语者。母语者们对其中80%的句子在可接受性或不可接受性上达成了一致。受试者与语言学家仅在一半的例句上有相同的直觉。有人建议,语言学家应就例句的可接受性咨询非语言学家,这些例句阐释了所提出的规则,以此检验这些规则是否反映了所描述的通用语言的形式结构。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验