Spencer N J
Psychology Department, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania.
J Psycholinguist Res. 1973 Jun;2(2):83-98. doi: 10.1007/BF01067203.
Modern transformational grammarians, using only their own intuitions as the basic data for rule construction, may not be analyzing the common, natural language of the speech community. Do native speakers share the intuitions of linguists? One hundred and fifty exemplar sentences from 6 linguists' articles were presented to 43 linguistically naive and 22 linguistically nonnaive native speakers. Native speakers agreed among themselves as to the acceptability or unacceptability of 80% of the sentences. Subjects shared intuitions with linguists in only a half of the exemplars. It is suggested that linguists consult nonlinguists as to the acceptability of exemplars, which illustrate the rules proposed, as a check that those rules reflect the formal structure of the common language being described.
现代转换生成语法学家仅将自身直觉作为构建规则的基本数据,他们可能并未分析言语社区的通用自然语言。以英语为母语的人是否与语言学家有相同的直觉呢?从6位语言学家的文章中选取了150个例句,呈现给43位未接触过语言学知识的母语者和22位有语言学基础的母语者。母语者们对其中80%的句子在可接受性或不可接受性上达成了一致。受试者与语言学家仅在一半的例句上有相同的直觉。有人建议,语言学家应就例句的可接受性咨询非语言学家,这些例句阐释了所提出的规则,以此检验这些规则是否反映了所描述的通用语言的形式结构。