Cordier Reinie, Wilson Nathan J
School of Occupational Therapy and Social Work, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Health Soc Care Community. 2014 May;22(3):249-58. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12076. Epub 2013 Nov 6.
Men's Sheds are named within the Australian and Irish National Male Health Policies as an exemplar of male health and well-being and offer a range of formal and informal mentoring to counter the known consequences of social exclusion. The study aimed to report on whether Men's Sheds undertake mentoring programmes, and if so, who is being mentored; are mentors being trained, and if so by whom; and the perceived effectiveness of the mentoring programme. Furthermore, the study aimed to explore associations between sheds with a mentoring programme and factors that reflect an inclusive and a health-focused environment. All known Men's Sheds were invited to participate in the survey; of those, 324 (42.8%) Men's Sheds in Australia and 59 (48.0%) International sheds participated in the study between April and August 2012. Overall, 39.2% (n = 127) of Australian sheds and 23.7% (n = 14) of International sheds undertook formal mentoring. Youth was the most common group being mentored in both Australia (60.6%; n = 77) and Internationally (71.4%; n = 10). Over half of Australian shed co-ordinators rated their mentoring programme as moderately effective (52.8%; n = 67) and over a third as highly effective (36.2%; n = 46), while half of International shed co-ordinators rated theirs as highly effective (50.0%; n = 7). The findings from this paper support the notion that a large number of Men's Sheds offer formal mentoring programmes targeting a range of disadvantaged sub-populations, thus supporting social inclusion. Inter-generational mentoring is the most frequently occurring type of mentoring programme. While training mentors occurs at some sheds, the efficacy of this training and programme outcomes are unknown. A typology of shed types appears to be emerging based on a divergence of sheds with a more utilitarian focus and sheds that appear to embrace a health and well-being focus.
“男性之家”在澳大利亚和爱尔兰的国家男性健康政策中被视为男性健康与福祉的典范,它提供一系列正式和非正式的指导,以应对社会排斥带来的已知后果。该研究旨在报告“男性之家”是否开展指导项目,如果开展,被指导的对象是谁;指导者是否接受培训,如果是,由谁培训;以及指导项目的感知效果。此外,该研究旨在探讨开展指导项目的“男性之家”与反映包容和以健康为重点环境的因素之间的关联。所有已知的“男性之家”都被邀请参与调查;其中,2012年4月至8月期间,澳大利亚的324个(42.8%)“男性之家”和59个(48.0%)国际“男性之家”参与了研究。总体而言,澳大利亚39.2%(n = 127)的“男性之家”和国际23.7%(n = 14)的“男性之家”开展了正式指导。在澳大利亚(60.6%;n = 77)和国际上(71.4%;n = 10),年轻人是最常见的被指导群体。超过一半的澳大利亚“男性之家”协调员将他们的指导项目评为中等有效(52.8%;n = 67),超过三分之一评为非常有效(36.2%;n = 46),而一半的国际“男性之家”协调员将他们的项目评为非常有效(50.0%;n = 7)。本文的研究结果支持了这样一种观点,即大量的“男性之家”提供针对一系列弱势群体的正式指导项目,从而支持社会包容。代际指导是最常见的指导项目类型。虽然一些“男性之家”会培训指导者,但这种培训的效果和项目成果尚不清楚。基于更注重实用主义的“男性之家”和似乎更注重健康与福祉的“男性之家”之间的差异,一种“男性之家”类型学似乎正在形成。