Hansji Neeraj L, Wilson Nathan J, Cordier Reinie
Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Health Soc Care Community. 2015 May;23(3):272-81. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12140. Epub 2014 Nov 27.
The health of Australian men has recently received greater attention. Men's Sheds are named in national policy as an exemplar community-based organisation for the betterment of men's psychosocial health; yet, the evidence base to support this is limited. This study investigates the comparative experience of men with long-term disabilities and men without long-term disabilities who go to a Men's Shed and to what extent this provides these men with an enabling, as opposed to disabling, environment. Data were collected from 12 individual interviews with men with long-term disabilities (5) and men without long-term disabilities (6), including 1 interview with the male Men's Shed Coordinator (MSC); participant observation within the shed; and a document received from the female MSC regarding the funding the Shed receives. Interviews explored the men's experiences at the Shed and their sense of belonging and social inclusion. Participants had any type of long-term disability and had been attending the shed for a minimum of 1 month. Data were collected between May and September 2013 and were analysed using the constant comparative method of grounded theory. The core theme that emerged was an enabling community space. The four sub-themes were: a community and social hub; an equalising space; a safe and supportive male environment; and meaningful male activities. The current literature exemplifies Men's Sheds to be important community-based organisations beneficial to men's health and well-being. For men living with long-term disabilities, this study illuminates that Men's Sheds offer an environment of equality, facilitating a collegial and egalitarian culture. Men can partake in enabling activities and enjoy the company of other men enhancing their sense of belonging and social inclusion as well as interact with other community groups that occupy the same space as the Men's Shed.
澳大利亚男性的健康问题近来受到了更多关注。“男性之家”在国家政策中被视为一个基于社区的典范组织,旨在改善男性的心理社会健康;然而,支持这一观点的证据基础却很有限。本研究调查了有长期残疾的男性和没有长期残疾的男性在“男性之家”的比较经历,以及它在多大程度上为这些男性提供了一个有利而非不利的环境。数据收集自对12名男性的个人访谈,其中有长期残疾的男性5名,没有长期残疾的男性6名,还包括对男性“男性之家”协调员(MSC)的1次访谈;在“男性之家”内的参与观察;以及从女性MSC那里收到的一份关于该“男性之家”所获资金的文件。访谈探讨了男性在“男性之家”的经历以及他们的归属感和社会融入感。参与者患有任何类型的长期残疾,且至少已参加该“男性之家”活动1个月。数据于2013年5月至9月收集,并采用扎根理论的持续比较法进行分析。浮现出的核心主题是一个有利的社区空间。四个子主题分别是:一个社区和社交中心;一个平等空间;一个安全且支持性的男性环境;以及有意义的男性活动。当前的文献表明“男性之家”是对男性健康和福祉有益的重要社区组织。对于患有长期残疾的男性来说,本研究表明“男性之家”提供了一个平等的环境,促进了一种合作和平等主义的文化。男性可以参与有益的活动,享受与其他男性为伴的时光,增强他们的归属感和社会融入感,还能与占据和“男性之家”相同空间的其他社区团体进行互动。