Suppr超能文献

严重和持久神经性厌食症患者生活质量评估:通用和专用工具的比较。

Assessment of quality of life in people with severe and enduring anorexia nervosa: a comparison of generic and specific instruments.

机构信息

School of Medicine, University of Western Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Psychiatry. 2013 Nov 7;13:284. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-13-284.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Criticisms that generic measures of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) are not sensitive to impairment in anorexia nervosa (AN) has spurred the development of disease-specific measures. This study aimed to compare the psychometric properties of a generic to a disease-specific measure of HRQoL.

METHODS

63 participants with AN completed measures of a generic HRQoL (SF-12), disease-specific HRQoL (Eating Disorders Quality of Life Questionnaire; EDQOL), functional impairment (days out of role; DOR; Work and Social Adjustment Scale; WSAS), and eating disorder severity (Eating Disorder Examination; EDE) at baseline, post-treatment, and 6- and 12-months follow-up. Cronbach's α was computed for the SF-12 and EDQOL (internal consistency). Correlations were assessed between SF-12/EDQOL scores and DOR, WSAS, and EDE scores (convergence validity). Three sets of three multiple linear regressions were performed using SF-12 and EDQOL scores as predictors and change in DOR, WSAS, and EDE global scores from baseline to (i) post-treatment, (ii) 6-month follow-up, (iii) and 12-month follow-up as dependent variables (predictive validity and sensitivity).

RESULTS

The EDQOL displayed stronger internal consistency (α = 0.92) than the SF-12 (α = 0.80). The SF-12 converged more strongly with DOR and the WSAS (r(p) = -0.31 to -0.63 vs. 0.06 to 0.70), while the EDQOL converged more strongly with the EDE (r(p) = -0.01 to 0.48 vs. -0.01 to -0.37). The SF-12 demonstrated stronger predictive validity (β = -0.55 to 0.29) and sensitivity to changes in ED severity (β = -0.47 to 0.32).

CONCLUSIONS

The SF-12 is a valid and sensitive measure of HRQoL impairment in patients with AN. While the SF-12 may be preferred in research comparing EDs to other populations, and in research and practice as an indicator of functional impairment; the EDQOL may be preferred by clinicians and researchers interested in HRQoL impairment specifically associated with an ED and as an additional indicator of ED severity.

摘要

背景

有人批评通用的健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)衡量标准不能准确反映神经性厌食症(AN)的损害,这促使了疾病特异性衡量标准的发展。本研究旨在比较通用和疾病特异性 HRQoL 衡量标准的心理测量特性。

方法

63 名 AN 患者在基线、治疗后以及 6 个月和 12 个月随访时,完成了通用 HRQoL(SF-12)、疾病特异性 HRQoL(饮食失调生活质量问卷;EDQOL)、功能障碍(缺勤天数;DOR;工作和社会适应量表;WSAS)和饮食失调严重程度(饮食失调检查;EDE)的评估。对 SF-12 和 EDQOL 进行了 Cronbach's α 计算(内部一致性)。评估了 SF-12/EDQOL 评分与 DOR、WSAS 和 EDE 评分之间的相关性(收敛有效性)。使用 SF-12 和 EDQOL 评分作为预测变量,使用 DOR、WSAS 和 EDE 总分从基线到(i)治疗后、(ii)6 个月随访和(iii)12 个月随访的变化作为因变量,进行了三组三个多元线性回归(预测有效性和敏感性)。

结果

EDQOL 的内部一致性更强(α=0.92),而 SF-12 的内部一致性较弱(α=0.80)。SF-12 与 DOR 和 WSAS 的相关性更强(r(p)=-0.31 至-0.63 与 0.06 至 0.70),而 EDQOL 与 EDE 的相关性更强(r(p)=-0.01 至 0.48 与-0.01 至-0.37)。SF-12 表现出更强的预测有效性(β=-0.55 至 0.29)和对 ED 严重程度变化的敏感性(β=-0.47 至 0.32)。

结论

SF-12 是一种有效的、敏感的 AN 患者 HRQoL 受损衡量标准。虽然在比较 ED 与其他人群的研究中,以及作为功能障碍指标的研究和实践中,SF-12 可能更受欢迎;但对于关注特定于 ED 的 HRQoL 受损的临床医生和研究人员,以及作为 ED 严重程度的附加指标,EDQOL 可能更受欢迎。

相似文献

3
Validation of the Spanish version of the eating disorders quality of life instrument (EDQOL).
J Eat Disord. 2023 Jun 28;11(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s40337-023-00832-w.
6
Associations among eating disorder behaviors and eating disorder quality of life in adult women with anorexia nervosa.
Psychiatry Res. 2018 Sep;267:108-111. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.05.077. Epub 2018 May 31.
7
Predictors and moderators of outcome for severe and enduring anorexia nervosa.
Behav Res Ther. 2014 May;56:91-8. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2014.03.006. Epub 2014 Mar 29.
8
[Validation of the German translation of the Eating Disorders Quality of Life (EDQOL)].
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2011 Jan;61(1):16-24. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1243195. Epub 2010 Feb 2.
10
Treating severe and enduring anorexia nervosa: a randomized controlled trial.
Psychol Med. 2013 Dec;43(12):2501-11. doi: 10.1017/S0033291713000949. Epub 2013 May 3.

引用本文的文献

2
Quality of Life and Clinical Impairment in Spanish Adolescent Anorexia Nervosa Patients.
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2024 May 15;14(5):1425-1436. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe14050094.
3
4
Specific psychological therapies versus other therapies or no treatment for severe and enduring anorexia nervosa.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Aug 23;8(8):CD011570. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011570.pub2.
5
Validation of the Spanish version of the eating disorders quality of life instrument (EDQOL).
J Eat Disord. 2023 Jun 28;11(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s40337-023-00832-w.
7
The Neuropsychological Profile of Severe and Enduring Anorexia Nervosa: A Systematic Review.
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 2;12:708536. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.708536. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Treating severe and enduring anorexia nervosa: a randomized controlled trial.
Psychol Med. 2013 Dec;43(12):2501-11. doi: 10.1017/S0033291713000949. Epub 2013 May 3.
2
Treatment for severe and enduring anorexia nervosa: a review.
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2012 Dec;46(12):1136-44. doi: 10.1177/0004867412450469. Epub 2012 Jun 13.
4
Validity studies of quality of life instruments for eating disorders: systematic review of the literature.
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2010 Dec;198(12):854-9. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e3181fe7294.
5
Eating disorders and quality of life: a review of the literature.
Clin Psychol Rev. 2011 Feb;31(1):113-21. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.08.003. Epub 2010 Aug 14.
6
Setting the eating disorder aside: an alternative model of care.
Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2010 Mar;18(2):90-6. doi: 10.1002/erv.989.
7
Health-related quality of life and eating disorders: a review and update.
Int J Eat Disord. 2009 Mar;42(2):179-87. doi: 10.1002/eat.20602.
9
Specialist supportive clinical management for anorexia nervosa.
Int J Eat Disord. 2006 Dec;39(8):625-32. doi: 10.1002/eat.20297.
10
The prevalence and correlates of eating disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication.
Biol Psychiatry. 2007 Feb 1;61(3):348-58. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.03.040. Epub 2006 Jul 3.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验