Liu Ming, Yu Xi, Huang Fuguo, Cen Shiqiang, Zhong Gang, Xiang Zhou
Orthopedics. 2013 Nov;36(11):868-73. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20131021-10.
Due to their good biocompatibility and mechanical integrity, tissue engineering scaffolds have become a principal method of repair and regeneration of osteochondral defects. To improve their intrinsic properties, control their degenerative times, and enhance their cell adhesion and differentiation, numerous scaffold architectures and formation methods have been developed and tested, but the ideal scaffold design is still controversial. Moreover, scaffold fixation has a significant influence on repair and regeneration after implantation. The authors analyzed relative studies to address the latest scaffold designs, including biphasic scaffold, multilayered scaffold, and continuous nonstratified scaffold, and this article compares their advantages and disadvantages. In addition, the authors introduce a novel modified method for scaffold fixation known as magnetic fixation. Both stratified and nonstratified scaffolds can repair osteochondral defects, but continuous nonstratified scaffolds are more biomimetic compared with the native osteochondral structures, and they lead to a better regeneration of hyaline-like cartilage and structured bone tissue. Therefore, the authors suggest continuous nonstratified scaffolds are an effective option for treating osteochondral defects.
由于具有良好的生物相容性和机械完整性,组织工程支架已成为修复和再生骨软骨缺损的主要方法。为了改善其固有特性、控制其退变时间并增强其细胞黏附与分化能力,人们开发并测试了众多支架结构和构建方法,但理想的支架设计仍存在争议。此外,支架固定对植入后的修复和再生有重大影响。作者分析了相关研究以探讨最新的支架设计,包括双相支架、多层支架和连续非分层支架,本文比较了它们的优缺点。此外,作者介绍了一种称为磁固定的新型支架固定改良方法。分层和非分层支架均可修复骨软骨缺损,但与天然骨软骨结构相比,连续非分层支架更具仿生学特性,并且能更好地再生透明样软骨和结构化骨组织。因此,作者认为连续非分层支架是治疗骨软骨缺损的有效选择。