Suppr超能文献

随机交叉临床试验:真实和假性周边棱镜眼镜治疗偏盲。

Randomized crossover clinical trial of real and sham peripheral prism glasses for hemianopia.

机构信息

Schepens Eye Research Institute, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Chadwick Optical, Inc, Souderton, Philadelphia.

出版信息

JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014 Feb;132(2):214-22. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.5636.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

There is a major lack of randomized controlled clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of prismatic treatments for hemianopia. Evidence for their effectiveness is mostly based on anecdotal case reports and open-label evaluations without a control condition.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of real relative to sham peripheral prism glasses for patients with complete homonymous hemianopia.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Double-masked, randomized crossover trial at 13 study sites, including the Peli laboratory at Schepens Eye Research Institute, 11 vision rehabilitation clinics in the United States, and 1 in the United Kingdom. Patients were 18 years or older with complete homonymous hemianopia for at least 3 months and without visual neglect or significant cognitive decline.

INTERVENTION

Patients were allocated by minimization into 2 groups. One group received real (57-prism diopter) oblique and sham (<5-prism diopter) horizontal prisms; the other received real horizontal and sham oblique, in counterbalanced order. Each crossover period was 4 weeks.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was the overall difference, across the 2 periods of the crossover, between the proportion of participants who wanted to continue with (said yes to) real prisms and the proportion who said yes to sham prisms. The secondary outcome was the difference in perceived mobility improvement between real and sham prisms.

RESULTS

Of 73 patients randomized, 61 completed the crossover. A significantly higher proportion said yes to real than sham prisms (64% vs 36%; odds ratio, 5.3; 95% CI, 1.8-21.0). Participants who continued wear after 6 months reported greater improvement in mobility with real than sham prisms at crossover end (P = .002); participants who discontinued wear reported no difference.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Real peripheral prism glasses were more helpful for obstacle avoidance when walking than sham glasses, with no differences between the horizontal and oblique designs. Peripheral prism glasses provide a simple and inexpensive mobility rehabilitation intervention for hemianopia.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00494676.

摘要

重要性

评估棱镜治疗对完全同侧偏盲患者疗效的随机对照临床试验非常缺乏。其疗效的证据主要基于轶事病例报告和无对照条件的开放标签评估。

目的

评估真性相对于假性周边棱镜眼镜对完全同侧偏盲患者的疗效。

设计、地点和参与者:在 13 个研究地点进行的双盲、随机交叉试验,包括 Schepens 眼科研究所的 Peli 实验室、美国的 11 个视力康复诊所和英国的 1 个诊所。患者年龄在 18 岁或以上,至少有 3 个月的完全同侧偏盲,无视觉忽略或明显认知能力下降。

干预

患者通过最小化分配到 2 组。一组接受真(57 棱镜度)斜和假(<5 棱镜度)水平棱镜;另一组接受真水平和假斜棱镜,以平衡方式交替。每个交叉期为 4 周。

主要结果和测量指标

主要结果是在交叉的 2 个周期中,参与者中想要继续使用(对)真棱镜和想要使用(对)假棱镜的比例之间的总体差异。次要结果是真棱镜和假棱镜之间感知移动改善的差异。

结果

在 73 名随机患者中,有 61 名完成了交叉。选择真棱镜的比例明显高于选择假棱镜的比例(64%比 36%;优势比,5.3;95%置信区间,1.8-21.0)。在交叉结束时,继续佩戴 6 个月后的参与者报告称,真棱镜在移动性方面的改善明显大于假棱镜(P=0.002);停止佩戴的参与者则报告没有差异。

结论和相关性

与假性棱镜眼镜相比,真性周边棱镜眼镜在行走时对障碍物的回避更有帮助,水平和斜设计之间没有差异。周边棱镜眼镜为偏盲提供了一种简单且经济的移动康复干预措施。

试验注册

clinicaltrials.gov 标识符:NCT00494676。

相似文献

1
Randomized crossover clinical trial of real and sham peripheral prism glasses for hemianopia.
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014 Feb;132(2):214-22. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.5636.
3
Community-based trial of a peripheral prism visual field expansion device for hemianopia.
Arch Ophthalmol. 2008 May;126(5):657-64. doi: 10.1001/archopht.126.5.657.
4
Clinical and laboratory evaluation of peripheral prism glasses for hemianopia.
Optom Vis Sci. 2009 May;86(5):492-502. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e31819f9e4d.
5
Peripheral prism glasses: effects of moving and stationary backgrounds.
Optom Vis Sci. 2015 Apr;92(4):412-20. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000552.
6
Peripheral prism glasses: effects of dominance, suppression, and background.
Optom Vis Sci. 2012 Sep;89(9):1343-52. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3182678d99.
8
Patients with homonymous hemianopia become visually qualified to drive using novel monocular sector prisms.
J Neuroophthalmol. 2014 Mar;34(1):53-6. doi: 10.1097/WNO.0000000000000060.
9
Binocular rivalry with peripheral prisms used for hemianopia rehabilitation.
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2014 Sep;34(5):573-9. doi: 10.1111/opo.12143.

引用本文的文献

3
4
The effect of visual rivalry in peripheral head-mounted displays on mobility.
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 18;13(1):20199. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-47427-8.
5
Gaze Scanning at Street Crossings by Pedestrians With Homonymous Hemianopia With and Without Hemispatial Neglect.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2023 Nov 1;64(14):26. doi: 10.1167/iovs.64.14.26.
6
Oblique multi-periscopic prism for field expansion of homonymous hemianopia.
Biomed Opt Express. 2023 Apr 27;14(5):2352-2364. doi: 10.1364/BOE.485373. eCollection 2023 May 1.
7
Development and 5-year Evaluation of Diagnosis-Specific Protocols for Visual Neuro-Rehabilitation in a Multicenter Inpatient Rehabilitation Network.
Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2022 Nov 17;5(1):100246. doi: 10.1016/j.arrct.2022.100246. eCollection 2023 Mar.
8
Effects of Perceptual-motor Training on Collision Judgments with Peripheral Prism Expanded Vision.
Optom Vis Sci. 2022 Dec 1;99(12):875-884. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001957. Epub 2022 Nov 26.
9
Visual Field Loss: Integrating Overlayed Information to Increase the Effective Field of View.
Vision (Basel). 2022 Nov 11;6(4):67. doi: 10.3390/vision6040067.
10
Rehabilitation of visual perception in cortical blindness.
Handb Clin Neurol. 2022;184:357-373. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-819410-2.00030-8.

本文引用的文献

1
A pilot evaluation of on-road detection performance by drivers with hemianopia using oblique peripheral prisms.
Stroke Res Treat. 2012;2012:176806. doi: 10.1155/2012/176806. Epub 2012 Dec 20.
2
Interventions for visual field defects in patients with stroke.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Oct 5(10):CD008388. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008388.pub2.
3
Prism therapy and visual rehabilitation in homonymous visual field loss.
Optom Vis Sci. 2011 Feb;88(2):263-8. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e318205a3b8.
4
Meta-analyses involving cross-over trials: methodological issues.
Int J Epidemiol. 2011 Dec;40(6):1732-4. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyp345. Epub 2009 Dec 21.
5
Clinical treatment options for patients with homonymous visual field defects.
Clin Ophthalmol. 2008 Mar;2(1):93-102. doi: 10.2147/opth.s2371.
6
Driving with hemianopia, I: Detection performance in a driving simulator.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009 Nov;50(11):5137-47. doi: 10.1167/iovs.09-3799. Epub 2009 Jul 15.
7
Collision judgment when using an augmented-vision head-mounted display device.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009 Sep;50(9):4509-15. doi: 10.1167/iovs.08-2916. Epub 2009 May 20.
8
Approaches to rehabilitation for visual field defects following brain lesions.
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2009 May;6(3):291-305. doi: 10.1586/erd.09.8.
9
Clinical and laboratory evaluation of peripheral prism glasses for hemianopia.
Optom Vis Sci. 2009 May;86(5):492-502. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e31819f9e4d.
10
Community-based trial of a peripheral prism visual field expansion device for hemianopia.
Arch Ophthalmol. 2008 May;126(5):657-64. doi: 10.1001/archopht.126.5.657.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验