• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

公众对遗传学和基因组学政策问题的看法。

Public opinion on policy issues in genetics and genomics.

作者信息

Almeling Rene, Gadarian Shana Kushner

机构信息

Department of Sociology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

Department of Political Science, Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, USA.

出版信息

Genet Med. 2014 Jun;16(6):491-4. doi: 10.1038/gim.2013.175. Epub 2013 Nov 7.

DOI:10.1038/gim.2013.175
PMID:24202084
Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to examine public opinion on major policy issues in genetics and genomics, including federal spending on genetic research, the perceived significance of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008, and whether clinicians should be involved in direct-to-consumer genetic testing.

METHODS

This was a survey with a nationally representative sample of 2,100 American adults administered by the nonpartisan research firm YouGov in January 2011.

RESULTS

The majority of the respondents (57%) believe that the federal government should spend more on genetic research, 82% rank the 2008 antidiscrimination law as "important," and 65% say that clinicians should be involved in explaining genetic test results (contra the practice of some direct-to-consumer companies). On all three policy issues, gender and political party affiliation were statistically significantly associated with respondents' views, whereas race/ethnicity and education were less consistently associated with policy opinions.

CONCLUSION

Americans demonstrate widespread support for scientific research on genetics, laws protecting citizens against genetic discrimination, and the need to involve medical professionals in the process of genetic testing. These results are useful for scientists designing research projects, clinicians interacting with patients, professional organizations lobbying for resources, federal agencies setting budget priorities, and legislators designing regulation.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在调查公众对遗传学和基因组学重大政策问题的看法,包括联邦政府在基因研究上的支出、2008年《基因信息非歧视法案》的感知重要性,以及临床医生是否应参与直接面向消费者的基因检测。

方法

这是一项由无党派研究公司舆观(YouGov)于2011年1月对2100名美国成年人进行的全国代表性抽样调查。

结果

大多数受访者(57%)认为联邦政府应增加基因研究支出,82%的人将2008年的反歧视法列为“重要”,65%的人表示临床医生应参与解释基因检测结果(与一些直接面向消费者的公司的做法相反)。在所有这三个政策问题上,性别和政党归属与受访者的观点在统计学上有显著关联,而种族/族裔和教育程度与政策意见的关联则不太一致。

结论

美国人普遍支持基因科学研究、保护公民免受基因歧视的法律,以及医疗专业人员参与基因检测过程的必要性。这些结果对设计研究项目的科学家、与患者互动的临床医生、争取资源的专业组织、确定预算优先事项的联邦机构以及制定法规的立法者都很有用。

相似文献

1
Public opinion on policy issues in genetics and genomics.公众对遗传学和基因组学政策问题的看法。
Genet Med. 2014 Jun;16(6):491-4. doi: 10.1038/gim.2013.175. Epub 2013 Nov 7.
2
Predictors of trust in the general science and climate science research of US federal agencies.预测美国联邦机构的一般科学和气候科学研究的信任度的因素。
Public Underst Sci. 2017 Oct;26(7):843-860. doi: 10.1177/0963662516636040. Epub 2016 Mar 8.
3
Public opinion and legislators' views on tobacco policy.公众舆论与立法者对烟草政策的看法。
J Ky Med Assoc. 2000 Feb;98(2):67-73.
4
Genetic information: consumers' right to privacy versus insurance companies' right to know: a public opinion survey.遗传信息:消费者的隐私权与保险公司的知情权——一项民意调查
J Bus Ethics. 1999 May;19(4):355-62. doi: 10.1023/a:1005716006206.
5
American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: genetic testing for cancer susceptibility.美国临床肿瘤学会政策声明更新:癌症易感性基因检测
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2397-406. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.03.189. Epub 2003 Apr 11.
6
Looking Beyond GINA: Policy Approaches to Address Genetic Discrimination.超越 GINA:解决遗传歧视的政策方法。
Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2020 Aug 31;21:491-507. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genom-111119-011436. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
7
Clinton bans federal money for efforts to clone humans.克林顿禁止使用联邦资金进行克隆人类的研究。
N Y Times Web. 1997 Mar 5:A15.
8
The allure and peril of genetics exceptionalism: do we need special genetics legislation?基因例外论的诱惑与风险:我们是否需要专门的基因立法?
Wash Univ Law Q. 2001 Fall;79(3):669-748.
9
The Australian joint inquiry into the Protection of Human Genetic Information.澳大利亚对人类遗传信息保护的联合调查。
New Genet Soc. 2003 Apr;22(1):89-113. doi: 10.1080/1463677032000069727.
10
Genomics research: world survey of public funding.基因组学研究:全球公共资金调查。
BMC Genomics. 2008 Oct 10;9:472. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-472.

引用本文的文献

1
Citizens' Attitudes, Knowledge, and Educational Needs in the Field of Omics Sciences: A Systematic Literature Review.组学科学领域中公民的态度、知识和教育需求:一项系统的文献综述
Front Genet. 2020 Oct 23;11:570649. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2020.570649. eCollection 2020.
2
The role of race and ethnicity in views toward and participation in genetic studies and precision medicine research in the United States: A systematic review of qualitative and quantitative studies.种族和民族在美国对基因研究和精准医学研究的看法和参与中的作用:定性和定量研究的系统评价。
Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2020 Feb;8(2):e1099. doi: 10.1002/mgg3.1099. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
3
Does information about abortion safety affect Texas voters' opinions about restrictive laws? A randomized study.
关于堕胎安全性的信息会影响德克萨斯州选民对限制性法律的看法吗?一项随机研究。
Contraception. 2017 Dec;96(6):381-387. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2017.08.007. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
4
Genes, cells, and biobanks: Yes, there's still a consent problem.基因、细胞与生物样本库:没错,同意问题依然存在。
PLoS Biol. 2017 Jul 25;15(7):e2002654. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2002654. eCollection 2017 Jul.
5
Consumer Perspectives on Access to Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: Role of Demographic Factors and the Testing Experience.消费者对直接面向消费者的基因检测的获取途径的看法:人口统计学因素和检测体验的作用。
Milbank Q. 2017 Jun;95(2):291-318. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12262.
6
Attitudes towards personal genomics among older Swiss adults: An exploratory study.瑞士老年成年人对个人基因组学的态度:一项探索性研究。
Appl Transl Genom. 2016 Feb 1;8:9-15. doi: 10.1016/j.atg.2016.01.009. eCollection 2016 Mar.
7
Gun ownership and social gun culture.枪支拥有与社会枪支文化。
Inj Prev. 2016 Jun;22(3):216-20. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2015-041586. Epub 2015 Jun 29.
8
Demographic differences in willingness to provide broad and narrow consent for biobank research.生物样本库研究中提供广义和狭义同意意愿的人口统计学差异。
Biopreserv Biobank. 2015 Apr;13(2):98-106. doi: 10.1089/bio.2014.0032. Epub 2015 Mar 31.