• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测美国联邦机构的一般科学和气候科学研究的信任度的因素。

Predictors of trust in the general science and climate science research of US federal agencies.

机构信息

George Mason University, USA.

University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA.

出版信息

Public Underst Sci. 2017 Oct;26(7):843-860. doi: 10.1177/0963662516636040. Epub 2016 Mar 8.

DOI:10.1177/0963662516636040
PMID:26960910
Abstract

In this article, we focus on a key strategic objective of scientific organizations: maintaining the trust of the public. Using data from a nationally representative survey of American adults ( n = 1510), we assess the extent to which demographic factors and political ideology are associated with citizens' trust in general science and climate science research conducted by US federal agencies. Finally, we test whether priming individuals to first consider agencies' general science research influences trust in their climate science research, and vice versa. We found that federal agencies' general science research is more trusted than their climate science research-although a large minority of respondents did not have an opinion-and that political ideology has a strong influence on public trust in federal scientific research. We also found that priming participants to consider general scientific research does not increase trust in climate scientific research. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.

摘要

在本文中,我们关注科学组织的一个关键战略目标:保持公众的信任。我们利用一项针对美国成年人(n=1510)的全国代表性调查的数据,评估人口统计学因素和政治意识形态与公民对美国联邦机构进行的一般科学和气候科学研究的信任程度之间的关系。最后,我们测试了是否预先提示个人首先考虑机构的一般科学研究是否会影响他们对气候科学研究的信任,反之亦然。我们发现,联邦机构的一般科学研究比其气候科学研究更受信任——尽管很大一部分受访者没有意见——而且政治意识形态对公众对联邦科学研究的信任有很大的影响。我们还发现,预先提示参与者考虑一般科学研究并不会增加对气候科学研究的信任。讨论了对理论和实践的影响。

相似文献

1
Predictors of trust in the general science and climate science research of US federal agencies.预测美国联邦机构的一般科学和气候科学研究的信任度的因素。
Public Underst Sci. 2017 Oct;26(7):843-860. doi: 10.1177/0963662516636040. Epub 2016 Mar 8.
2
Trust In US Federal, State, And Local Public Health Agencies During COVID-19: Responses And Policy Implications.在 COVID-19 期间信任美国联邦、州和地方公共卫生机构:回应和政策意义。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2023 Mar;42(3):328-337. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2022.01204.
3
Evaluating the effects of ideology on public understanding of climate change science: how to improve communication across ideological divides?评估意识形态对公众气候变化科学理解的影响:如何在意识形态分歧中改善沟通?
Public Underst Sci. 2010 Nov;19(6):743-61. doi: 10.1177/0963662509357871.
4
Politics and the erosion of federal scientific capacity: restoring scientific integrity to public health science.政治与联邦科研能力的削弱:恢复公共卫生科学的科研诚信
Am J Public Health. 2007 Nov;97(11):1939-44. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.118455. Epub 2007 Sep 27.
5
Awareness and trust of the FDA and CDC: Results from a national sample of US adults and adolescents.美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)和疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)的认知度与信任度:来自美国成年人和青少年全国样本的结果
PLoS One. 2017 May 16;12(5):e0177546. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177546. eCollection 2017.
6
Belief in public efficacy, trust, and attitudes toward modern genetic science.对公众效能的信念、信任以及对现代基因科学的态度。
Risk Anal. 2007 Aug;27(4):921-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2007.00932.x.
7
Perceptions of climate change and trust in information providers in rural Australia.澳大利亚农村地区对气候变化的认知及对信息提供者的信任。
Public Underst Sci. 2014 Feb;23(2):170-88. doi: 10.1177/0963662512449948. Epub 2012 Jul 24.
8
Individuals with greater science literacy and education have more polarized beliefs on controversial science topics.科学素养和受教育程度较高的个体在有争议的科学话题上的观点更为两极分化。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Sep 5;114(36):9587-9592. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1704882114. Epub 2017 Aug 21.
9
A science confidence gap: Education, trust in scientific methods, and trust in scientific institutions in the United States, 2014.科学信任差距:2014 年美国的科学教育、对科学方法的信任和对科学机构的信任。
Public Underst Sci. 2017 Aug;26(6):704-720. doi: 10.1177/0963662515617367. Epub 2015 Dec 6.
10
Perceived losses of scientific integrity under the Trump administration: A survey of federal scientists.特朗普政府时期科学诚信的感知损失:对联邦科学家的调查。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 23;15(4):e0231929. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231929. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
Integrating regression and multiobjective optimization techniques to analyze scientific perception.整合回归与多目标优化技术以分析科学认知。
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 9;15(1):4819. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-89065-2.
2
Trust in scientists and their role in society across 68 countries.68个国家民众对科学家及其在社会中所扮演角色的信任度。
Nat Hum Behav. 2025 Apr;9(4):713-730. doi: 10.1038/s41562-024-02090-5. Epub 2025 Jan 20.
3
Ideological diversity of media consumption predicts COVID-19 vaccination.媒体消费的意识形态多样性预测 COVID-19 疫苗接种。
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 22;14(1):28948. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-77408-4.
4
Learning from and about scientists: Consensus messaging shapes perceptions of climate change and climate scientists.向科学家学习并了解科学家:共识性信息塑造了对气候变化和气候科学家的认知。
PNAS Nexus. 2024 Oct 31;3(11):pgae485. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae485. eCollection 2024 Nov.
5
How pandemic-related changes in global attitudes toward the scientific community shape "post-pandemic" environmental opinion.大流行相关的全球对科学界态度的变化如何塑造“后大流行”时期的环境观点。
Public Underst Sci. 2023 Oct;32(7):907-925. doi: 10.1177/09636625231167735. Epub 2023 May 19.
6
Public trust and mistrust of climate science: A meta-narrative review.公众对气候科学的信任与不信任:一项元叙述性综述。
Public Underst Sci. 2022 Oct;31(7):832-846. doi: 10.1177/09636625221110028. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
7
Climate denial in Canada and the United States.加拿大和美国的气候否认论。
Can Rev Sociol. 2022 Aug;59(3):369-394. doi: 10.1111/cars.12388. Epub 2022 Jun 21.
8
Effects of Exposure to Conflicting Information About Mammography on Cancer Information Overload, Perceived Scientists' Credibility, and Perceived Journalists' Credibility.关于乳房 X 光摄影术的相互矛盾的信息对癌症信息过载、感知科学家可信度和感知记者可信度的影响。
Health Commun. 2023 Oct;38(11):2481-2490. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2022.2077163. Epub 2022 May 23.
9
Exploring the Role of Trust in Scientists to Explain Health-Related Behaviors in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic.探索科学家信任在解释应对新冠疫情的健康相关行为中的作用。
Sci Educ (Dordr). 2022;31(5):1281-1309. doi: 10.1007/s11191-022-00323-5. Epub 2022 Feb 5.
10
COVID-19 pandemic impacts on conservation research, management, and public engagement in US national parks.新冠疫情对美国国家公园的保护研究、管理及公众参与的影响。
Biol Conserv. 2021 May;257:109038. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109038. Epub 2021 Mar 26.