Featherstone R L, Fosbraey P, Morton I K
Br J Pharmacol. 1986 Jan;87(1):73-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1986.tb10158.x.
The potencies of three tachykinin antagonists [D-Pro4,D-Trp7,9,10]SP(4-11), [D-Arg1,D-Pro2,D-Trp7,9,Leu11]SP(1-11) and [D-Arg1,D-Trp7,9,Leu11]SP(1-11) (spantide) against eledoisin were examined in the guinea-pig ileum myenteric plexus, where a continuous superfusion system was employed to examine evoked release of [3H]-acetylcholine [( 3H]-ACh]); effects on mechanical activity of the preparations were also measured. Eledoisin was chosen as the standard tachykinin agonist since the rank order of potency observed in evoking release was eledoisin, kassinin, substance P, physalaemin; on this basis is may be presumed that an 'SP-E' type receptor was involved in the release process. The two undecapeptide antagonists both significantly reduced the response to eledoisin (10 nM) as assessed by both [3H]-ACh release and mechanical activity which under these conditions was largely dependent on ACh release, and the response levels could be restored by increasing the concentration of eledoisin to 100 nM. The pA2 values for the two antagonists were estimated as 5.3 for [D-Arg1,D-Pro2,D-Trp7,9,Leu11]SP(1-11) and 5.2 for [D-Arg1,D-Trp7,9,Leu11]SP(1-11). [D-Pro4,D-Trp7,9,10]SP(4-11) was markedly less potent with a pA2 value of less than 4.8. All three antagonists possessed considerable inherent stimulatory activity as measured both by [3H]-ACh release and mechanical activity, [D-Pro4,D-Trp7,9,10]SP(4-11) being the most active in this respect, a 10 microM concentration producing 50% of the response seen with 10 nM eledoisin. These findings are discussed both in relation to tachykinin receptor classifications and limitations in the use of such antagonists in the study of the role of tachykinins in neurotransmission.
在豚鼠回肠肌间神经丛中研究了三种速激肽拮抗剂[D - Pro4,D - Trp7,9,10]SP(4 - 11)、[D - Arg1,D - Pro2,D - Trp7,9,Leu11]SP(1 - 11)和[D - Arg1,D - Trp7,9,Leu11]SP(1 - 11)(spantide)对蛙皮素的拮抗作用,采用连续灌流系统检测[3H] - 乙酰胆碱([3H] - ACh)的诱发性释放;还测定了它们对标本机械活性的影响。选择蛙皮素作为标准速激肽激动剂,因为在诱发性释放中观察到的效价顺序为蛙皮素、雨蛙肽、P物质、 Physalaemin;据此推测释放过程中涉及一种“SP - E”型受体。两种十一肽拮抗剂通过[3H] - ACh释放和机械活性评估,均显著降低了对蛙皮素(10 nM)的反应,在这些条件下机械活性很大程度上依赖于ACh释放,通过将蛙皮素浓度增加到100 nM可恢复反应水平。两种拮抗剂的pA2值估计为:[D - Arg1,D - Pro2,D - Trp7,9,Leu11]SP(1 - 11)为5.3,[D - Arg1,D - Trp7,9,Leu11]SP(1 - 11)为5.2。[D - Pro4,D - Trp7,9,10]SP(4 - 11)的效价明显较低,pA2值小于4.8。通过[3H] - ACh释放和机械活性测定,所有三种拮抗剂均具有相当大的内在刺激活性,[D - Pro4,D - Trp7,9,10]SP(4 - 11)在这方面活性最强,10 μM浓度产生的反应为10 nM蛙皮素所产生反应的50%。结合速激肽受体分类以及此类拮抗剂在研究速激肽在神经传递中的作用时的局限性,对这些发现进行了讨论。