• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童患者的迷走神经刺激术:真的值得吗?

Vagus nerve stimulation in pediatric patients: Is it really worthwhile?

机构信息

Centro de Cirurgia de Epilepsia (CIREP), Departamento de Neurociências e Ciências do Comportamento, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Division of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.

出版信息

Epilepsy Behav. 2014 Feb;31:329-33. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2013.10.011. Epub 2013 Nov 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.yebeh.2013.10.011
PMID:24210463
Abstract

Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) seems to be effective in the management of selected cases of pharmacoresistant epilepsy in children. This was a case-control prospective study of children with refractory epilepsy submitted to vagal nerve stimulator implantation and a control group with epilepsy treated with antiepileptic drugs. Patients under 18years of age who underwent clinical or surgical treatment because of pharmacoresistant epilepsy from January 2009 to January 2012 were followed and compared with an age-matched control group at final evaluation. Statistically significant differences were observed considering age at epilepsy onset (VNS group - 1.33±1.45years; controls - 3.23±3.11; p=0.0001), abnormal findings in neurological examination (p=0.01), history of previous ineffective epilepsy surgery (p=0.03), and baseline seizure frequency (p=0.0001). At long-term follow-up, 55.4% of the patients in the VNS group had at least 50% reduction of seizure frequency, with 11.1% of the patients presenting 95% reduction on seizure frequency. Also, a decrease in traumas and hospitalization due to seizures and a subjective improvement in mood and alertness were observed. The control group did not show a significant modification in seizure frequency during the study. In this series, VNS patients evolved with a statistically significant reduction of the number of seizures, a decreased morbidity of the seizures, and the number of days in inpatient care. In accordance with the current literature, VNS has been proven to be an effective alternative in the treatment of pediatric patients with drug-resistant epilepsy.

摘要

迷走神经刺激(VNS)似乎对儿童耐药性癫痫的某些病例的治疗有效。这是一项针对接受迷走神经刺激器植入的耐药性癫痫儿童和接受抗癫痫药物治疗的癫痫对照组的病例对照前瞻性研究。2009 年 1 月至 2012 年 1 月,对因耐药性癫痫而接受临床或手术治疗的 18 岁以下患者进行了随访,并在最终评估时与年龄匹配的对照组进行了比较。观察到以下方面存在统计学显著差异:癫痫发作年龄(VNS 组 - 1.33±1.45 岁;对照组 - 3.23±3.11 岁;p=0.0001)、神经检查异常(p=0.01)、既往无效癫痫手术史(p=0.03)和基线发作频率(p=0.0001)。在长期随访中,VNS 组中有 55.4%的患者发作频率至少降低了 50%,其中 11.1%的患者发作频率降低了 95%。此外,还观察到由于癫痫发作而导致的创伤和住院次数减少,以及情绪和警觉性的主观改善。对照组在研究期间癫痫发作频率没有明显变化。在本系列中,VNS 患者的发作次数、癫痫发作的发病率以及住院天数均有统计学显著减少。根据当前文献,VNS 已被证明是治疗耐药性癫痫儿童的有效替代方法。

相似文献

1
Vagus nerve stimulation in pediatric patients: Is it really worthwhile?儿童患者的迷走神经刺激术:真的值得吗?
Epilepsy Behav. 2014 Feb;31:329-33. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2013.10.011. Epub 2013 Nov 5.
2
Refractory epilepsy in tuberous sclerosis: vagus nerve stimulation with or without subsequent resective surgery.结节性硬化症的耐药性癫痫:迷走神经刺激术联合或不联合后续切除术。
Epilepsy Behav. 2009 Nov;16(3):454-60. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2009.08.018. Epub 2009 Sep 19.
3
The efficacy of vagal nerve stimulation in children with pharmacoresistant epilepsy: practical experience at a Turkish tertiary referral center.迷走神经刺激术治疗药物难治性癫痫儿童的疗效:土耳其三级转诊中心的实践经验。
Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2010 Jul;14(4):334-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2009.09.010. Epub 2009 Oct 21.
4
Vagus nerve stimulation for drug-resistant epilepsy: a European long-term study up to 24 months in 347 children.迷走神经刺激术治疗耐药性癫痫:一项针对347名儿童长达24个月的欧洲长期研究。
Epilepsia. 2014 Oct;55(10):1576-84. doi: 10.1111/epi.12762. Epub 2014 Sep 17.
5
Vagus nerve stimulation for children with treatment-resistant epilepsy: a consecutive series of 141 cases.迷走神经刺激术治疗难治性癫痫患儿:141例连续病例系列研究
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2011 May;7(5):491-500. doi: 10.3171/2011.2.PEDS10505.
6
Vagus nerve stimulation for refractory epilepsy in children: More to VNS than seizure frequency reduction.儿童难治性癫痫的迷走神经刺激:迷走神经刺激的作用不止于降低癫痫发作频率。
Epilepsia. 2009 May;50(5):1220-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2008.01940.x. Epub 2009 Dec 15.
7
The Israeli retrospective multicenter open-label study evaluating vagus nerve stimulation efficacy in children and adults.一项评估迷走神经刺激对儿童和成人疗效的以色列回顾性多中心开放标签研究。
Isr Med Assoc J. 2013 Nov;15(11):673-7.
8
Vagus nerve stimulation for medically refractory epilepsy: a long-term follow-up study.迷走神经刺激治疗药物难治性癫痫:一项长期随访研究。
Seizure. 2007 Oct;16(7):579-85. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2007.04.005. Epub 2007 May 31.
9
Long-term outcome of vagus nerve stimulation therapy after failed epilepsy surgery.癫痫手术后失败的迷走神经刺激治疗的长期结果。
Seizure. 2011 Apr;20(3):244-8. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2010.12.003. Epub 2010 Dec 31.
10
Vagus nerve stimulation for refractory epilepsy: a Belgian multicenter study.迷走神经刺激治疗难治性癫痫:一项比利时多中心研究。
Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2007 Sep;11(5):261-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2007.01.008. Epub 2007 Mar 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Therapeutic Strategies in Children with Epilepsy: A Quality-of-Life-Related Perspective.癫痫患儿的治疗策略:与生活质量相关的视角
J Clin Med. 2024 Jan 11;13(2):405. doi: 10.3390/jcm13020405.
2
Single-center long-term results of vagus nerve stimulation for pediatric epilepsy: a 10-17-year follow-up study.小儿癫痫迷走神经刺激术的单中心长期结果:一项10 - 17年的随访研究
Childs Nerv Syst. 2023 Nov;39(11):3215-3224. doi: 10.1007/s00381-023-05992-3. Epub 2023 May 23.
3
Brain functional connectivity-based prediction of vagus nerve stimulation efficacy in pediatric pharmacoresistant epilepsy.
基于脑功能连接的预测儿童药物难治性癫痫迷走神经刺激疗效。
CNS Neurosci Ther. 2023 Nov;29(11):3259-3268. doi: 10.1111/cns.14257. Epub 2023 May 11.
4
Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation would be an alternative to implantable cervical vagus nerve stimulation in some situation.经皮耳迷走神经刺激在某些情况下可能是植入式颈部迷走神经刺激的替代方法。
J Tradit Chin Med. 2023 Jun;43(3):627-630. doi: 10.19852/j.cnki.jtcm.20230308.002.
5
Effect of Vagus Nerve Stimulation on Blood Inflammatory Markers in Children with Drug-Resistant Epilepsy: A Pilot Study.迷走神经刺激对耐药性癫痫患儿血液炎症标志物的影响:一项初步研究。
Children (Basel). 2022 Jul 29;9(8):1133. doi: 10.3390/children9081133.
6
Epilepsy and Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD): The Underlying Mechanisms and Therapy Targets Related to Adenosine.癫痫与自闭症谱系障碍(ASD):与腺苷相关的潜在机制和治疗靶点。
Curr Neuropharmacol. 2023;21(1):54-66. doi: 10.2174/1570159X20666220706100136.
7
Vagus nerve stimulation: a 20-year Australian experience.迷走神经刺激术:澳大利亚 20 年的经验。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2022 Jan;164(1):219-227. doi: 10.1007/s00701-021-05046-0. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
8
Health Technology Assessment Report on Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Drug-Resistant Epilepsy.《迷走神经刺激治疗耐药性癫痫的卫生技术评估报告》
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 24;17(17):6150. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17176150.
9
Somatosensory evoked fields predict response to vagus nerve stimulation.体感诱发电场可预测迷走神经刺激的反应。
Neuroimage Clin. 2020;26:102205. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102205. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
10
Efficacy and tolerability of vagus nerve stimulation therapy (VNS) in Slovenian epilepsy patients: younger age and shorter duration of epilepsy might result in better outcome.迷走神经刺激疗法(VNS)在斯洛文尼亚癫痫患者中的疗效与耐受性:年龄较小且癫痫病程较短可能会带来更好的治疗效果。
Acta Clin Croat. 2019 Jun;58(2):255-264. doi: 10.20471/acc.2019.58.02.08.