• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

小儿机器人辅助腹腔镜肾盂输尿管切除术与经腹腔镜单部位肾盂输尿管切除术的比较。

Comparison of pediatric robotic-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy and laparoendoscopic single-site nephroureterectomy.

机构信息

Division of Pediatric Urology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH.

Division of Pediatric Urology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH.

出版信息

Urology. 2014 Feb;83(2):438-42. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.08.066. Epub 2013 Nov 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2013.08.066
PMID:24210571
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare outcomes between pediatric robotic-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy (RALNU) and laparoendoscopic single-site nephroureterectomy (LESSNU).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed of all patients who underwent RALNU and LESSNU at a single pediatric institution from April 2009 to April 2013. Patient demographics, perioperative details, and outcomes were reviewed.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients (20 men, 12 women) were identified. Twenty-four patients underwent RALNU and 8 patients underwent LESSNU. There was no significant blood loss, intraoperative complication, or conversion to open or standard laparoscopy for either procedure. Median age was 55.1 months (range 4.5-171.8 months) for RALNU and 51.6 months (range 16.3-144.9 months) for LESSNU (P = .695). Median weight was 19.1 kg (range 7-55 kg) for RALNU and 16.9 kg (range 11-41 kg) for LESSNU (P = .727). Median operative time was 227 minutes (range 112-362 minutes) for RALNU and 174 minutes (range 74-288 minutes) for LESSNU (P = .028). Median length of hospital stay was 2 days (range 1-4 days) for RALNU and 1 day (range 0-6 days) for LESSNU (P = .134). Median in-patient postoperative narcotic use of morphine-equivalent was 0.03 mg/kg/day (range 0-0.2) for RALNU and <0.01 mg/kg/day (range 0-0.2) for LESSNU (P = .134). Median in-patient postoperative Ketorolac use was <0.01 mg/kg/day (range 0-0.8) for RALNU and <0.01 mg/kg/day (range 0-0.5) for LESSNU (P = .784). Median follow-up was 22 months (range 0.8-48.4 months) for RALNU and 18.8 months (range 0.3-29.4 months) for LESSNU (P = .361). We observed 2 complications (8.3%) in RALNU and 1 in LESSNU (P = 1).

CONCLUSION

LESSNU has a significantly shorter operative time with comparable in-patient postoperative narcotics use as compared to RALNU.

摘要

目的

比较小儿机器人辅助腹腔镜肾盂输尿管切除术(RALNU)与经腹腔镜单部位肾盂输尿管切除术(LESSNU)的结果。

方法

对 2009 年 4 月至 2013 年 4 月在单一儿科机构接受 RALNU 和 LESSNU 的所有患者进行了回顾性队列研究。回顾了患者的人口统计学、围手术期细节和结果。

结果

确定了 32 名患者(20 名男性,12 名女性)。24 例患者接受 RALNU 治疗,8 例患者接受 LESSNU 治疗。两种手术均无明显失血、术中并发症或转为开放或标准腹腔镜手术。RALNU 的中位年龄为 55.1 个月(范围 4.5-171.8 个月),LESSNU 的中位年龄为 51.6 个月(范围 16.3-144.9 个月)(P =.695)。RALNU 的中位体重为 19.1 公斤(范围 7-55 公斤),LESSNU 的中位体重为 16.9 公斤(范围 11-41 公斤)(P =.727)。RALNU 的中位手术时间为 227 分钟(范围 112-362 分钟),LESSNU 的中位手术时间为 174 分钟(范围 74-288 分钟)(P =.028)。RALNU 的中位住院时间为 2 天(范围 1-4 天),LESSNU 的中位住院时间为 1 天(范围 0-6 天)(P =.134)。RALNU 的中位术后住院吗啡当量的阿片类药物使用量为 0.03mg/kg/天(范围 0-0.2),LESSNU 的中位术后住院吗啡当量的阿片类药物使用量为 <0.01mg/kg/天(范围 0-0.2)(P =.134)。RALNU 的中位术后住院期间使用酮咯酸的剂量为 <0.01mg/kg/天(范围 0-0.8),LESSNU 的中位术后住院期间使用酮咯酸的剂量为 <0.01mg/kg/天(范围 0-0.5)(P =.784)。RALNU 的中位随访时间为 22 个月(范围 0.8-48.4 个月),LESSNU 的中位随访时间为 18.8 个月(范围 0.3-29.4 个月)(P =.361)。我们观察到 RALNU 中有 2 种并发症(8.3%),LESSNU 中有 1 种并发症(P = 1)。

结论

LESSNU 的手术时间明显缩短,与 RALNU 相比,术后住院期间阿片类药物的使用量相当。

相似文献

1
Comparison of pediatric robotic-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy and laparoendoscopic single-site nephroureterectomy.小儿机器人辅助腹腔镜肾盂输尿管切除术与经腹腔镜单部位肾盂输尿管切除术的比较。
Urology. 2014 Feb;83(2):438-42. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.08.066. Epub 2013 Nov 6.
2
Laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) robot-assisted nephroureterectomy: comparison with conventional multiport technique in the management of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.腹腔镜单部位(LESS)机器人辅助肾输尿管切除术:与传统多孔技术治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌的比较。
BJU Int. 2014 Jul;114(1):90-7. doi: 10.1111/bju.12356. Epub 2013 Oct 31.
3
Initial experience of laparoendoscopic single-site nephroureterectomy with bladder cuff excision for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma performed by a single surgeon.单外科医师施行腹腔镜单部位肾输尿管切除术并膀胱袖套状切除治疗上泌尿道上皮细胞癌之初步经验。
J Endourol. 2011 Nov;25(11):1763-8. doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0729. Epub 2011 Aug 24.
4
A clinical series of laparoscopic nephrectomy, nephroureterectomy and heminephroureterectomy in the pediatric population.一组针对小儿群体的腹腔镜肾切除术、肾输尿管切除术和半肾输尿管切除术的临床病例。
J Urol. 2000 May;163(5):1531-5.
5
Laparoendoscopic single-site nephrectomy and heminephroureterectomy in children using standard laparoscopic setup versus conventional laparoscopy.儿童使用标准腹腔镜设备与传统腹腔镜行经脐单部位腹腔镜肾切除术和半侧输尿管切除术。
Urology. 2013 Aug;82(2):430-5. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.02.057. Epub 2013 May 2.
6
Comparison of retroperitoneal laparoscopic and open nephrectomy for benign renal diseases in children.儿童良性肾脏疾病的后腹腔镜与开放肾切除术比较
Urology. 2004 Mar;63(3):566-70; discussion 570. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2003.11.040.
7
Matched comparison of robotic vs laparoscopic nephroureterectomy: an initial experience.机器人与腹腔镜肾输尿管切除术的匹配比较:初步经验。
Urology. 2014 Feb;83(2):345-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.07.079. Epub 2013 Dec 7.
8
Comparison of laparoscopic and open nephroureterectomy for benign disease.腹腔镜与开放肾输尿管切除术治疗良性疾病的比较。
J Urol. 1998 Mar;159(3):732-4.
9
Early comparison of nephrectomy options in children (open, transperitoneal laparoscopic, laparo-endoscopic single site (LESS), and robotic surgery).儿童肾切除术方式的早期比较(开放性、经腹腔腹腔镜、经腹腔镜单部位(LESS)和机器人手术)。
BJU Int. 2012 Mar;109(6):910-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10524.x. Epub 2011 Aug 23.
10
Intermediate follow-up of hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic nephroureterectomy for management of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: comparison with open nephroureterectomy.手辅助后腹腔镜肾输尿管切除术治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌的中期随访:与开放性肾输尿管切除术的比较
Urology. 2007 Jun;69(6):1030-4. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.01.088.

引用本文的文献

1
Pediatric robotic urologic procedures: Indications and outcomes.小儿机器人泌尿外科手术:适应证与结果
Indian J Urol. 2023 Apr-Jun;39(2):107-120. doi: 10.4103/iju.iju_276_22. Epub 2023 Mar 31.
2
Robotic-assisted surgery in the pediatric surgeons' world: Current situation and future prospectives.小儿外科医生领域中的机器人辅助手术:现状与未来展望
Front Pediatr. 2023 Feb 14;11:1120831. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1120831. eCollection 2023.
3
Paediatric robotic surgery: a narrative review.儿科机器人手术:叙述性综述。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Aug;17(4):1171-1179. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01523-z. Epub 2023 Jan 16.
4
Robotic surgery in pediatric urology.小儿泌尿外科中的机器人手术
Urol Ann. 2022 Oct-Dec;14(4):314-316. doi: 10.4103/ua.ua_36_22. Epub 2022 Sep 16.
5
Robot-assisted vs. laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on comparative studies.机器人辅助与腹腔镜肾输尿管切除术治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌:基于比较研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Oncol. 2022 Aug 3;12:964256. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.964256. eCollection 2022.
6
Robotic Surgery: Is There a Possibility of Increasing Its Application in Pediatric Settings? A Single-Center Experience.机器人手术:在儿科环境中增加其应用的可能性是否存在?单中心经验。
Children (Basel). 2022 Jul 8;9(7):1021. doi: 10.3390/children9071021.
7
The Role of the Versius Surgical Robotic System in the Paediatric Population.Versius手术机器人系统在儿科人群中的作用。
Children (Basel). 2022 May 30;9(6):805. doi: 10.3390/children9060805.
8
Comparison of modified transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site nephroureterectomy and retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephroureterectomy: initial experience.改良经脐单孔腹腔镜肾输尿管切除术与后腹腔镜肾输尿管切除术的比较:初步经验
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2020 Mar;15(1):199-207. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2019.87492. Epub 2019 Sep 17.
9
Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Surgery: Prospective Series of 186 Pediatric Surgeries.机器人辅助腹腔镜和胸腔镜手术:186例小儿外科手术的前瞻性系列研究
Front Pediatr. 2019 May 21;7:200. doi: 10.3389/fped.2019.00200. eCollection 2019.
10
Paediatric robotic surgery.小儿机器人手术
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2018 Sep;100(Suppl 7):18-21. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.supp2.18.