• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人与腹腔镜肾输尿管切除术的匹配比较:初步经验。

Matched comparison of robotic vs laparoscopic nephroureterectomy: an initial experience.

机构信息

Department of Urology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI.

Department of Urology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI.

出版信息

Urology. 2014 Feb;83(2):345-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.07.079. Epub 2013 Dec 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2013.07.079
PMID:24315310
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare our initial robotic-assisted nephroureterectomy (RAN) experience with a well-established practice of performing laparoscopic nephroureterectomy (LN) to treat upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC).

METHODS

We reviewed our prospectively maintained minimally invasive surgery database. Patients who underwent RAN from April 2009 to December 2011 were matched by pathologic tumor stage and age (± 10 years) to those who underwent LN.

RESULTS

Twenty-two matched pairs were evaluated. Mean operative time (298 vs 251 minutes) and estimated blood loss (EBL, 380 vs 233 mL) were significantly higher for RAN, with a greater need for transfusion in this group. Complication rates were similar. The RAN group trended toward more frequent lymph node dissection and greater median node count when lymph node dissection was performed (59% vs 27% [P = .07] and 5.5 vs 1.0 [P = .13]). After a median follow-up of 10 months for RAN and 15 months for LN, no significant difference was seen in the rate of bladder (36% vs 37%) or distant (32% vs 23%) recurrence, with similar median time to any recurrence (9 months vs 4 months, P = .32).

CONCLUSION

RAN was associated with higher operative time and blood loss likely because of more frequent use of node dissection, robot repositioning, and technical inexperience. Lymph node dissection was more frequently performed with RAN, which reflects surgeon practice patterns. When a lymph node dissection was performed, the median node count was greater with RAN. Our initial experience with RAN suggests that this is an acceptable approach for the management of UTUC.

摘要

目的

将我们最初的机器人辅助肾输尿管切除术(RAN)经验与行腹腔镜肾输尿管切除术(LN)治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌(UTUC)的成熟经验进行比较。

方法

我们回顾了我们前瞻性维护的微创外科数据库。将 2009 年 4 月至 2011 年 12 月期间行 RAN 的患者按病理肿瘤分期和年龄(±10 岁)与行 LN 的患者进行匹配。

结果

评估了 22 对匹配的患者。RAN 的平均手术时间(298 分钟比 251 分钟)和估计失血量(EBL,380 毫升比 233 毫升)明显更高,且该组输血的需求更大。并发症发生率相似。当行淋巴结清扫术时,RAN 组倾向于更频繁地进行淋巴结清扫术,并且淋巴结计数中位数更高(59%比 27%[P=.07]和 5.5 比 1.0[P=.13])。RAN 组的中位随访时间为 10 个月,LN 组为 15 个月,膀胱(36%比 37%)或远处(32%比 23%)复发率无显著差异,任何复发的中位时间相似(9 个月比 4 个月,P=.32)。

结论

RAN 与更高的手术时间和出血量相关,这可能是由于更频繁地进行淋巴结清扫术、机器人重新定位和技术经验不足。RAN 更频繁地进行淋巴结清扫术,这反映了外科医生的实践模式。当进行淋巴结清扫术时,RAN 的中位数淋巴结计数更大。我们最初的 RAN 经验表明,这是治疗 UTUC 的一种可接受的方法。

相似文献

1
Matched comparison of robotic vs laparoscopic nephroureterectomy: an initial experience.机器人与腹腔镜肾输尿管切除术的匹配比较:初步经验。
Urology. 2014 Feb;83(2):345-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.07.079. Epub 2013 Dec 7.
2
Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma: is it better than open surgery?腹腔镜下肾输尿管切除术治疗上尿路移行细胞癌:它比开放手术更好吗?
Eur Urol. 2004 Dec;46(6):690-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2004.08.006.
3
Perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: a multi-institutional series.机器人辅助肾盂输尿管癌根治术的围手术期结果:多机构系列研究。
BJU Int. 2013 Aug;112(4):E295-300. doi: 10.1111/bju.12163.
4
Laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract transitional cell carcinoma: the Cleveland Clinic experience.腹腔镜根治性肾输尿管切除术治疗上尿路移行细胞癌:克利夫兰诊所的经验
J Urol. 2000 Nov;164(5):1513-22.
5
Does lymph node dissection during nephroureterectomy affect oncological outcomes in upper tract urothelial carcinoma patients without suspicious lymph node metastasis on preoperative imaging studies?在术前影像学检查未发现可疑淋巴结转移的上尿路尿路上皮癌患者中,肾输尿管切除术期间进行淋巴结清扫是否会影响肿瘤学结局?
World J Urol. 2017 Apr;35(4):665-673. doi: 10.1007/s00345-016-1918-z. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
6
Oncological outcomes after laparoscopic and open radical nephroureterectomy: results from an international cohort.腹腔镜与开放根治性肾输尿管切除术的肿瘤学结果:国际队列研究结果。
BJU Int. 2011 Aug;108(3):406-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09826.x. Epub 2010 Nov 15.
7
Comparison of Single-docking Robotic-assisted and Traditional Laparoscopy for Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection During Nephroureterectomy With Bladder Cuff Excision for Upper-tract Urothelial Carcinoma.单对接机器人辅助与传统腹腔镜在上尿路尿路上皮癌肾输尿管切除术加膀胱袖口切除术中进行腹膜后淋巴结清扫的比较
Urology. 2016 Jan;87:216-23. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.07.070. Epub 2015 Oct 19.
8
Robotic nephroureterectomy: a simplified approach requiring no patient repositioning or robot redocking.机器人肾盂输尿管切除术:一种简化的方法,无需患者重新定位或机器人重新对接。
Eur Urol. 2014 Oct;66(4):769-77. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.02.060. Epub 2014 Mar 12.
9
Ureteroscopic and extirpative treatment of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: a 15-year comprehensive review of 160 consecutive patients.经输尿管镜和切除术治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌:160 例连续患者 15 年的综合回顾。
BJU Int. 2012 Dec;110(11):1618-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11066.x. Epub 2012 Mar 28.
10
Endoscopic versus laparoscopic management of noninvasive upper tract urothelial carcinoma: 20-year single center experience.内镜与腹腔镜治疗非浸润性上尿路尿路上皮癌:20 年单中心经验。
J Urol. 2013 Jun;189(6):2054-60. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.12.006. Epub 2012 Dec 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Robot-Assisted Radical Nephroureterectomy: A Safe and Effective Option for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma, Especially for Novice Surgeons.机器人辅助根治性肾输尿管切除术:治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌的一种安全有效的选择,尤其适用于新手外科医生。
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Apr 22;17(9):1394. doi: 10.3390/cancers17091394.
2
Robotic surgery of the urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract single surgeon initial experience, 66 consecutive cases.机器人手术治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌:单外科医生的初步经验,66 例连续病例。
BMC Urol. 2024 Nov 1;24(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s12894-024-01629-y.
3
A Retrospective Single-Center Comparative Study Between Robot-Assisted and Laparoscopic Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper-Tract Urothelial Carcinoma on Perioperative Results, Overall Survival, and Recurrence Rate.
一项关于机器人辅助根治性肾输尿管切除术与腹腔镜根治性肾输尿管切除术治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌的围手术期结果、总生存率和复发率的回顾性单中心比较研究。
Cureus. 2024 Aug 11;16(8):e66623. doi: 10.7759/cureus.66623. eCollection 2024 Aug.
4
A Literature Review of Perioperative Outcomes of Robotic Radical Nephrectomy (RRN) Versus Laparoscopic Radical Nephrectomy (LRN) for Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC).机器人辅助根治性肾切除术(RRN)与腹腔镜根治性肾切除术(LRN)治疗肾细胞癌(RCC)围手术期结局的文献综述
Cureus. 2023 Nov 19;15(11):e49077. doi: 10.7759/cureus.49077. eCollection 2023 Nov.
5
Robotic nephroureterectomy supplanting open and laparoscopic approach for upper tract urothelial carcinoma management: a narrative review.机器人辅助肾输尿管切除术取代开放手术和腹腔镜手术治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌:一项叙述性综述
Transl Androl Urol. 2023 Nov 30;12(11):1740-1752. doi: 10.21037/tau-23-73. Epub 2023 Nov 23.
6
Surgical and oncological outcomes of robot-assisted versus laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy for upper-tract urothelial carcinoma: A single-center comparative analysis.机器人辅助与腹腔镜根治性肾输尿管切除术治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌的手术及肿瘤学结局:单中心比较分析
Indian J Urol. 2023 Oct-Dec;39(4):285-291. doi: 10.4103/iju.iju_128_23. Epub 2023 Sep 29.
7
Oncological Efficacy of Robotic Nephroureterectomy vs. Open and Laparoscopic Nephroureterectomy for Suspected Non-Metastatic UTUC-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.机器人辅助肾输尿管切除术与开放及腹腔镜肾输尿管切除术治疗疑似非转移性上尿路尿路上皮癌的肿瘤学疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Oct 10;15(20):4926. doi: 10.3390/cancers15204926.
8
Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic nephroureterectomy; a systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人辅助与腹腔镜肾输尿管切除术;系统评价与荟萃分析。
BJUI Compass. 2023 Jan 22;4(3):246-255. doi: 10.1002/bco2.208. eCollection 2023 May.
9
Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes and Complications of Laparoscopic and Robotic Nephroureterectomy Approaches in Patients with Upper-Tract Urothelial Carcinoma.腹腔镜与机器人肾盂输尿管癌根治术治疗上尿路上皮癌的围手术期结局和并发症比较。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Jun;30(6):3805-3816. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-13221-z. Epub 2023 Mar 6.
10
Robot-assisted vs. laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on comparative studies.机器人辅助与腹腔镜肾输尿管切除术治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌:基于比较研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Oncol. 2022 Aug 3;12:964256. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.964256. eCollection 2022.