Evolution and Human Behavior Program and School of Natural Resources and Environment, University of Michigan, 48109-1115, Ann Arbor, MI.
Hum Nat. 1994 Sep;5(3):223-53. doi: 10.1007/BF02692153.
Women's fertility is the focus of most demographic analyses, for in most mammals, and in many preindustrial societies, variance in male fertility, while an interesting biological phenomenon, is irrelevant. Yet in monogamous societies, the reproductive ecology of men, as well as that of women, is important is creating reproductive patterns. In nineteenth-century Sweden, the focus of this study, male reproductive ecology responded to resource conditions: richer men had more children than poorer men. Men's fertility also interacted with local and historical factors in complex ways to have significant impact on population growth. As a result, "the" demographic transition was local, and locally reversible, in Sweden. Results cannot be simply translated from nineteenth-century studies to current attempts to promote fertility decline, because today, male and female resource-fertility curves differ in shape, not only in magnitude. When we translate studies of fertility decline, it is important to study individual fertility and to discern whether, in any particular case, male and female patterns are similar.
女性生育能力是大多数人口分析的焦点,因为在大多数哺乳动物和许多前工业化社会中,男性生育能力的差异虽然是一个有趣的生物学现象,但并不重要。然而,在一夫一妻制社会中,男性和女性的生殖生态学对于创造生殖模式都很重要。在本研究的重点——19 世纪的瑞典,男性生殖生态学对资源条件做出了反应:较富裕的男性比较贫穷的男性有更多的孩子。男性的生育能力还以复杂的方式与当地和历史因素相互作用,对人口增长产生了重大影响。因此,在瑞典,“人口”转型是局部的,也是可以局部逆转的。研究结果不能简单地从 19 世纪的研究中转化为当前促进生育率下降的尝试,因为如今,男性和女性的资源-生育曲线在形状上存在差异,而不仅仅是在幅度上。当我们翻译关于生育率下降的研究时,研究个体生育能力并辨别在任何特定情况下,男性和女性的模式是否相似是很重要的。