• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测未来行为:食用饼干棒作为零食有影响,但食用水果作为零食没有影响。

Visualising future behaviour: Effects for snacking on biscuit bars, but no effects for snacking on fruit.

作者信息

Adams Catherine, Rennie Laura, Uskul Ayse K, Appleton Katherine M

机构信息

Queen's University, Belfast, UK.

University of Essex, UK.

出版信息

J Health Psychol. 2015 Aug;20(8):1037-48. doi: 10.1177/1359105313506760. Epub 2013 Nov 11.

DOI:10.1177/1359105313506760
PMID:24217063
Abstract

In this study, participants (N = 223) were randomised to visualise snacking on fruit, visualise snacking on biscuit bars or no visualisation, and intentions and attitudes towards fruit and biscuit bars, immediate selection of fruit or biscuit bars and subsequent consumption were measured. No effects of visualising snacking on fruit were found once background variables were taken into account. Visualising snacking on biscuit bars, however, resulted in greater intentions to consume biscuit bars (smallest β = 0.19, p < 0.01). These findings suggest that specifics of the visualised target behaviour may be important in visualisation. Further investigation is needed before recommending visualisation for increasing fruit consumption.

摘要

在本研究中,参与者(N = 223)被随机分为三组,分别是想象吃水果零食、想象吃饼干棒或不进行想象,随后测量他们对水果和饼干棒的意向与态度、对水果或饼干棒的即时选择以及后续消费情况。在考虑背景变量后,未发现想象吃水果零食有任何效果。然而,想象吃饼干棒会导致更高的食用饼干棒意向(最小β = 0.19,p < 0.01)。这些发现表明,想象的目标行为细节在想象过程中可能很重要。在推荐使用想象来增加水果消费之前,还需要进一步研究。

相似文献

1
Visualising future behaviour: Effects for snacking on biscuit bars, but no effects for snacking on fruit.预测未来行为:食用饼干棒作为零食有影响,但食用水果作为零食没有影响。
J Health Psychol. 2015 Aug;20(8):1037-48. doi: 10.1177/1359105313506760. Epub 2013 Nov 11.
2
Visualisation for increasing health intentions: enhanced effects following a health message and when using a first-person perspective.增强健康意向的可视化呈现:健康信息与第一人称视角的使用增强效果。
Psychol Health. 2014;29(2):237-52. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2013.843685. Epub 2013 Oct 14.
3
The Impact of Autonomy-Framed and Control-Framed Implementation Intentions on Snacking Behaviour: The Moderating Effect of Eating Self-Efficacy.自主框架和控制框架实施意向对零食行为的影响:进食自我效能感的调节作用。
Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2019 Mar;11(1):42-58. doi: 10.1111/aphw.12142. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
4
Predicting what mothers feed their preschoolers: Guided by an extended theory of planned behaviour.预测母亲给学龄前儿童喂食什么:以扩展的计划行为理论为指导。
Appetite. 2019 Jun 1;137:250-258. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2019.03.011. Epub 2019 Mar 11.
5
Identifying the 'if' for 'if-then' plans: combining implementation intentions with cue-monitoring targeting unhealthy snacking behaviour.确定“如果-那么”计划的“如果”:将实施意向与线索监测相结合,以针对不健康的零食行为。
Psychol Health. 2014;29(12):1476-92. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2014.950658. Epub 2014 Aug 26.
6
Do British and Chinese adolescents snack for different reasons? A cross-country study using the Theory of Planned Behaviour and eating styles.英中青少年吃零食的原因是否不同?一项基于计划行为理论和饮食模式的跨国研究
Appetite. 2023 Aug 1;187:106591. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2023.106591. Epub 2023 May 13.
7
Using Temporal Self-Regulation Theory to understand healthy and unhealthy eating intentions and behaviour.运用时间自我调节理论理解健康和不健康饮食意向与行为。
Appetite. 2017 Sep 1;116:357-364. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.05.022. Epub 2017 May 16.
8
Mind the Gap? An Intensive Longitudinal Study of Between-Person and Within-Person Intention-Behavior Relations.注意差距?一项关于个体间和个体内意图-行为关系的密集纵向研究。
Ann Behav Med. 2016 Aug;50(4):516-22. doi: 10.1007/s12160-016-9776-x.
9
Personal and situational predictors of everyday snacking: An application of temporal self-regulation theory.个体和情境因素对日常零食消费的预测:时间自我调节理论的应用。
Br J Health Psychol. 2017 Nov;22(4):854-871. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12259. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
10
Assessing and comparing the short-term effects of TPB only and TPB plus implementation intentions interventions on snacking behavior in Iranian adolescent girls: a cluster randomized trial.评估和比较 TPB 单独干预和 TPB 加实施意向干预对伊朗少女吃零食行为的短期影响:一项聚类随机试验。
Am J Health Promot. 2013 Jan-Feb;27(3):152-61. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.110311-QUAN-113.

引用本文的文献

1
A Pilot Goal-Oriented Episodic Future Thinking Weight Loss Intervention for Low-Income Overweight or Obese Young Mothers.针对低收入超重或肥胖年轻母亲的以目标为导向的启发性未来思维减肥干预的初步研究。
Nutrients. 2023 Jul 3;15(13):3023. doi: 10.3390/nu15133023.
2
Adding Flavours: Use of and Attitudes towards Sauces and Seasonings in a Sample of Community-Dwelling UK Older Adults.添加风味:英国社区居住的老年人样本中对调味汁和调味料的使用及态度
Foods. 2021 Nov 17;10(11):2828. doi: 10.3390/foods10112828.
3
5-a-day fruit and vegetable food product labels: reduced fruit and vegetable consumption following an exaggerated compared to a modest label.
5-a-day 水果和蔬菜食品标签:与适度标签相比,夸大标签会导致水果和蔬菜摄入量减少。
BMC Public Health. 2018 May 15;18(1):624. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5528-0.
4
Greater fruit selection following an appearance-based compared with a health-based health promotion poster.与基于健康的健康促进海报相比,基于外观的海报会促使人们选择更多种类的水果。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2016 Dec 2;38(4):731-738. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdv147.