• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[功能独立性的测量:SINGER和FIM评估的一致性及其对使用者的影响]

[Measurement of functional independence: concordance of the assessments SINGER and FIM and consequences for the user].

作者信息

Freidel K, Leisse M

机构信息

Medizinischer Dienst der Krankenversicherung (MDK) Rheinland-Pfalz, Alzey.

MEDIAN Reha-Zentrum Bernkastel-Kues, MEDIAN Klinik Burg Landshut.

出版信息

Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2014 Feb;53(1):43-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1341456. Epub 2013 Nov 11.

DOI:10.1055/s-0033-1341456
PMID:24217883
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the concordance between the assessments SINGER and FIM, both measurements for detecting functional disabilities in activities of daily living (ADL).

METHODS

301 rehabilitants were assessed with FIM and SINGER in the beginning and at the end of an inpatient rehabilitation program. Correla­tion coefficient, regression analysis, and Kappa statistics were applied to examine the relationship and the concordance between the 2 ADL scales.

RESULTS

The assessments were highly correlated (rPearson=0.94). The regression analysis lead to the formula SINGERpred=− 0.004FIM2+1.363FIM – 15.871 with a model fit of R2=0.896. After fixing the limits for a classification due to the functional status, Inter-Rater Reliability (Kappa) was κ=0.69.

CONCLUSION

Both measurements can be used for quality assurance, therapy monitoring, and to classify patients considering their functional disability. Criteria are presented to decide which assessment should be selected.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估SINGER和FIM评估之间的一致性,这两种测量方法均用于检测日常生活活动(ADL)中的功能障碍。

方法

301名康复患者在住院康复计划开始时和结束时接受了FIM和SINGER评估。应用相关系数、回归分析和Kappa统计量来检验这两种ADL量表之间的关系和一致性。

结果

评估结果高度相关(Pearson相关系数r = 0.94)。回归分析得出公式SINGERpred = -0.004FIM² + 1.363FIM - 15.871,模型拟合度R² = 0.896。在根据功能状态确定分类界限后,评定者间信度(Kappa)为κ = 0.69。

结论

这两种测量方法均可用于质量保证、治疗监测以及根据患者的功能障碍对其进行分类。文中给出了决定应选择哪种评估的标准。

相似文献

1
[Measurement of functional independence: concordance of the assessments SINGER and FIM and consequences for the user].[功能独立性的测量:SINGER和FIM评估的一致性及其对使用者的影响]
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2014 Feb;53(1):43-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1341456. Epub 2013 Nov 11.
2
Interrater reliability of the 7-level functional independence measure (FIM).7级功能独立性测量(FIM)的评分者间信度。
Scand J Rehabil Med. 1994 Sep;26(3):115-9.
3
[Interobserver reliability of the "Functional Independence Measure" (FIM) in patients with craniocerebral injuries].["颅脑损伤患者中“功能独立性测量”(FIM)的观察者间信度"]
Pflege. 2002 Aug;15(4):191-7. doi: 10.1024/1012-5302.15.4.191.
4
The Functional Independence Measure: a comparative validity and reliability study.功能独立性测量:一项比较效度和信度研究。
Disabil Rehabil. 1995 Jan;17(1):10-4. doi: 10.3109/09638289509166622.
5
[Operationalization and feasibility of the early rehabilitation index ("lower-saxony early rehabilitation index")].[早期康复指数(“下萨克森州早期康复指数”)的实施与可行性]
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2012 Jun;51(3):194-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1275274. Epub 2011 May 30.
6
[Suitability of the SINGER as a tool for assessment in outpatient neurological rehabilitation].
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2015 Feb;54(1):22-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1394451. Epub 2015 Feb 12.
7
Understanding the impact of cognitive impairment and disease severity on activities of daily living in MS patients with different disability levels.了解认知障碍和疾病严重程度对不同残疾水平的多发性硬化症患者日常生活活动的影响。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2021 Jan;200:106398. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.106398. Epub 2020 Dec 4.
8
Evaluating the FONE FIM: Part II. Concurrent validity & influencing factors.
J Outcome Meas. 1997;1(4):259-85.
9
The reliability and validity of the proposed axis V (disabilities) of ICD-10.国际疾病分类第十版(ICD - 10)拟议的轴V(残疾)的可靠性和有效性。
Br J Psychiatry. 1994 Nov;165(5):683-5. doi: 10.1192/bjp.165.5.683.
10
Identification of high-risk individuals for the development of disability in activities of daily living. A ten-year follow-up study.识别日常生活活动中出现残疾的高风险个体。一项十年随访研究。
Exp Gerontol. 2013 Apr;48(4):437-43. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2013.02.002. Epub 2013 Feb 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of functional outcome and patient satisfaction between patients with socket prosthesis and patients treated with transcutaneous osseointegrated prosthetic systems (TOPS) after transfemoral amputation.股骨干截肢后,采用义肢式 socket 假肢和经皮骨整合式假体系统(TOPS)治疗的患者在功能结果和患者满意度方面的比较。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022 Dec;48(6):4867-4876. doi: 10.1007/s00068-022-02018-6. Epub 2022 Jun 18.