• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

国际疾病分类第十版(ICD - 10)拟议的轴V(残疾)的可靠性和有效性。

The reliability and validity of the proposed axis V (disabilities) of ICD-10.

作者信息

Daradkeh T K, Saad A

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Sciences, UAE University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.

出版信息

Br J Psychiatry. 1994 Nov;165(5):683-5. doi: 10.1192/bjp.165.5.683.

DOI:10.1192/bjp.165.5.683
PMID:7866686
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to examine the reliability and validity of the newly proposed axis V (disabilities) of ICD-10.

METHOD

Eighty-six acutely ill men and women were prospectively recruited from the Al Ain psychiatric units, UAE. Both versions of ICD-10, the Clinical Descriptions and Diagnostic Guidelines and the Diagnostic Criteria for Research (DCR) were used for coding axis I psychiatric diagnosis and its grade of severity; the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule was used to assess disabilities.

RESULTS

Inter-rater reliability of the DAS items ranged from moderate to good, and axis V ratings correctly predicted 84% of the observed classification on axis I.

CONCLUSION

Axis V is a valid measure of disabilities, but is limited by its modest reliability.

摘要

背景

本研究的目的是检验新提出的国际疾病分类第十版(ICD - 10)轴V(残疾)的可靠性和有效性。

方法

从阿联酋艾因的精神科病房前瞻性招募了86名急性病患者,男女皆有。使用ICD - 10的两个版本,即《临床描述与诊断指南》和《研究用诊断标准》(DCR)对轴I精神疾病诊断及其严重程度等级进行编码;使用世界卫生组织残疾评定量表评估残疾情况。

结果

残疾评定量表(DAS)项目的评定者间信度从中度到良好不等,轴V评分正确预测了轴I上84%的观察分类。

结论

轴V是残疾情况的有效测量指标,但受其适度可靠性的限制。

相似文献

1
The reliability and validity of the proposed axis V (disabilities) of ICD-10.国际疾病分类第十版(ICD - 10)拟议的轴V(残疾)的可靠性和有效性。
Br J Psychiatry. 1994 Nov;165(5):683-5. doi: 10.1192/bjp.165.5.683.
2
[Multi-axial system of chapter V (F) of ICD-10. Initial results of a multicenter practicability and reliability study].[《国际疾病分类第十版》第五章(F)的多轴系统。一项多中心实用性和可靠性研究的初步结果]
Nervenarzt. 1997 Mar;68(3):231-8. doi: 10.1007/s001150050118.
3
The multiaxial system of ICD-10: evaluation of a preliminary draft in a multicentric field trial.《国际疾病分类第十版(ICD - 10)的多轴系统:在多中心现场试验中对初稿的评估》
Psychopathology. 1996 Nov-Dec;29(6):347-56. doi: 10.1159/000285017.
4
Reliability of ICD-10 research criteria: an Arab perspective.《国际疾病分类第十版(ICD - 10)研究标准的可靠性:阿拉伯视角》
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1992 Dec;86(6):484-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1992.tb03302.x.
5
Inter-rater reliability of the Disability Assessment Schedule (DAS, version II). An Italian study.《残疾评估量表(DAS,第二版)》的评估者间信度:一项意大利的研究。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1991 Aug;26(4):147-50. doi: 10.1007/BF00795205.
6
Reliability and validity of DSM-IV Axis V scales in a clinical sample of veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版轴V量表在创伤后应激障碍退伍军人临床样本中的信度和效度
Psychiatr Danub. 2008 Sep;20(3):286-300.
7
Revising axis V for DSM-IV: a review of measures of social functioning.修订《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第四版》的轴V:社会功能测量综述。
Am J Psychiatry. 1992 Sep;149(9):1148-56. doi: 10.1176/ajp.149.9.1148.
8
Axis IV: a reliable and valid measure of psychosocial stressors?轴IV:心理社会应激源的可靠有效测量指标?
Compr Psychiatry. 1991 Nov-Dec;32(6):503-15. doi: 10.1016/0010-440x(91)90029-c.
9
Feasibility, reliability and validity of the Spanish version of Psychiatric Assessment Schedule for Adults with Developmental Disability: a structured psychiatric interview for intellectual disability.《发育障碍成人精神科评估量表》西班牙语版的可行性、信度和效度:一份针对智力残疾的结构化精神科访谈
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2002 Mar;46(Pt 3):209-17. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2788.2002.00402.x.
10
Axis V--Global Assessment of Functioning Scale. Evaluation of a self-report version.轴V——功能总体评定量表。一份自评版本的评估。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1994 Nov;90(5):342-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1994.tb01604.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Related Disorders among Female Yazidi Refugees following Islamic State of Iraq and Syria Attacks-A Case Series and Mini-Review.伊拉克和叙利亚伊斯兰国袭击后女性雅兹迪难民中的创伤后应激障碍及相关障碍——病例系列与综述
Front Psychiatry. 2017 Dec 13;8:282. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00282. eCollection 2017.
2
Inter-rater agreement in evaluation of disability: systematic review of reproducibility studies.残疾评估中的评分者间一致性:再现性研究的系统评价
BMJ. 2017 Jan 25;356:j14. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j14.