University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute , 311 9th Street North, Naples, 34102 , USA.
Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2014 Jan;11(1):61-8. doi: 10.1517/17425247.2013.859135. Epub 2013 Nov 13.
Currently, the standard therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration involves the use of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) drugs, which are delivered by repeated office-based intravitreal injections. This treatment is generally very effective in stabilizing or improving vision, although repeated injections create a burden for patients, family members and physicians. In addition, the cumulative risks of endophthalmitis and other complications increase with the number of injections.
In the clinic, much attention is focused on the relative efficacies of the three major anti-VEGF medications (bevacizumab, ranibizumab and aflibercept) as well as the most popular re-injection regimens (monthly, as-needed and treat-and-extend). In theory, intravitreal anti-VEGF drug delivery with sustained-release devices would offer similar visual results with fewer required re-injections. Various approaches have been studied, including noninvasive techniques, intraocular implants and colloidal carriers, such as liposomes, microparticles and nanoparticles.
Despite its theoretical appeal, sustained-release drug delivery will not replace current techniques unless it offers one or more advantages in efficacy, safety, convenience or cost. Currently, many patients maintain stable vision with intravitreal injections at intervals of 2 months or longer, so sustained-release techniques will have to lengthen these intervals substantially to become widely accepted. As we continue to collect data from clinical trials, the role of sustained-release techniques will become better defined.
目前,新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性的标准治疗方法是使用抗血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)药物,通过反复的眼内注射来实现。这种治疗方法通常在稳定或改善视力方面非常有效,尽管反复注射会给患者、患者家属和医生带来负担。此外,随着注射次数的增加,眼内炎和其他并发症的累积风险也会增加。
在临床上,人们非常关注三种主要的抗 VEGF 药物(贝伐单抗、雷珠单抗和阿柏西普)的相对疗效,以及最受欢迎的再注射方案(每月一次、按需治疗和治疗后延长)。理论上,使用具有缓释装置的眼内抗 VEGF 药物输送可以提供类似的视觉效果,而所需的再注射次数更少。已经研究了各种方法,包括非侵入性技术、眼内植入物和胶体载体,如脂质体、微粒和纳米颗粒。
尽管具有理论吸引力,但除非在疗效、安全性、便利性或成本方面具有一个或多个优势,否则缓释药物输送不会取代当前技术。目前,许多患者在 2 个月或更长时间的间隔内通过眼内注射维持稳定的视力,因此缓释技术必须大大延长这些间隔才能被广泛接受。随着我们继续从临床试验中收集数据,缓释技术的作用将得到更好的定义。