Department of Chemistry, Virginia Commonwealth University, 23264-2006, Richmond, VA.
J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 1994 Aug;5(8):704-17. doi: 10.1016/1044-0305(94)80002-2.
A comparative study of ab initio 6-31G() and semiempirical modified neglect of differential overlap (MNDO) bond orders and MNDO diatomic energy contributions for the description of bond strengths in neutral and protonated glycine, diglycine, triglycine, and dialanine is presented. Good correlations were found between 6-31G() and MNDO bond orders and between MNDO bond orders and diatomic energy contributions. Although bond orders and diatomic energy contributions are inherently different quantities, both predict the changes in bond strengths due to protonation to be qualitatively the same. The theoretically predicted differences in bond strengths for different protonated forms clearly indicate that in peptide fragmentation schemes one should consider even those protonated forms whose formation is not preferred energetically.
本文对从头计算的 6-31G()和半经验修正的忽略差叠(MNDO)键序以及 MNDO 双原子能量贡献进行了比较研究,用于描述中性和质子化甘氨酸、二肽、三肽和二丙氨酸的键强度。研究发现,6-31G()和 MNDO 键序之间以及 MNDO 键序和双原子能量贡献之间存在良好的相关性。尽管键序和双原子能量贡献是本质上不同的量,但它们都预测由于质子化引起的键强度变化在定性上是相同的。对于不同质子化形式的键强度的理论预测差异清楚地表明,在肽片段化方案中,人们应该考虑即使那些形成上不优先的质子化形式。