Vanderbilt Evidence-Based Practice Center, Institute for Medicine and Public Health, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Respir Care. 2013 Dec;58(12):2160-86. doi: 10.4187/respcare.02704. Epub 2013 Nov 12.
Nonpharmacologic airway clearance techniques are used to reduce the sequelae of obstructive secretions. We systematically reviewed comparative studies of nonpharmacologic interventions that health professionals can employ to achieve mucus clearance in hospitalized or postoperative patients without cystic fibrosis, over the age of 12 months. We searched MEDLINE and other databases from 1990 to 2012 to identify relevant literature. Two reviewers independently assessed each study against predetermined inclusion/exclusion criteria. Two reviewers also independently extracted data regarding subject and intervention characteristics and outcomes, and assigned overall quality ratings. The 32 studies meeting the review criteria included 24 randomized controlled trials, 7 crossover randomized controlled trials, and one prospective cohort study. Studies were typically small and together included a total of 2,453 subjects (mean 76/study). Studies generally examined chest physical therapy/physiotherapy modalities in postoperative or critically ill subjects or those with COPD. Interventions, comparators, and populations varied considerably across studies, hampering our ability to draw firm conclusions. Interventions, including conventional chest physical therapy/physiotherapy, intrapulmonary percussive ventilation, and positive expiratory pressure, typically provided small benefits in pulmonary function, gas exchange, oxygenation, and need for/duration of ventilation, among other outcomes, but differences between groups were generally small and not significant. Harms of the techniques were not consistently reported, though airway clearance techniques were generally considered safe in studies that did comment on adverse effects. Further research with clearly characterized populations and interventions is needed to understand the potential benefits and harms of these techniques.
非药物性气道清除技术用于减少阻塞性分泌物的后遗症。我们系统地回顾了比较研究,这些研究涉及健康专业人员可以采用的非药物干预措施,以清除无囊性纤维化、年龄在 12 个月以上的住院或术后患者的黏液。我们搜索了 MEDLINE 和其他数据库,以确定从 1990 年到 2012 年的相关文献。两名评审员独立地根据预定的纳入/排除标准评估每一项研究。两名评审员还独立地提取有关研究对象和干预措施特征以及结果的数据,并对整体质量进行评级。符合审查标准的 32 项研究包括 24 项随机对照试验、7 项交叉随机对照试验和 1 项前瞻性队列研究。这些研究通常规模较小,总共包括 2453 名受试者(平均每个研究 76 名)。研究通常检查术后或危重症患者或 COPD 患者的胸部物理治疗/理疗模式。干预措施、对照和人群在不同的研究中差异很大,这阻碍了我们得出明确结论的能力。干预措施,包括常规胸部物理治疗/理疗、肺内叩击通气和呼气正压通气,通常在肺功能、气体交换、氧合以及通气的需求/持续时间等方面提供了较小的益处,但组间差异通常较小且无统计学意义。这些技术的危害并没有得到一致的报告,尽管在那些确实评论了不良反应的研究中,气道清除技术通常被认为是安全的。需要进一步研究具有明确特征的人群和干预措施,以了解这些技术的潜在益处和危害。