Wolfensberger Aline, Sax Hugo, Weber Rainer, Zbinden Reinhard, Kuster Stefan P, Hombach Michael
Division of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 1;8(11):e79130. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079130. eCollection 2013.
We studied whether the change in antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) guidelines from CLSI to EUCAST influenced cumulative antibiograms in a tertiary care hospital in Switzerland.
Antibiotic susceptibilities of non-duplicate isolates collected within a one-year period before (period A) and after (period B) changing AST interpretation from CLSI 2009 to EUCAST 1.3 (2011) guidelines were analysed. In addition, period B isolates were reinterpreted according to the CLSI 2009, CLSI 2013 and EUCAST 3.1 (2013) guidelines.
The majority of species/drug combinations showed no differences in susceptibility rates comparing periods A and B. However, in some gram-negative bacilli, decreased susceptibility rates were observed when comparing CLSI 2009 with EUCAST 1.3 within period B: Escherichia coli / cefepime, 95.8% (CLSI 2009) vs. 93.1% (EUCAST 1.3), P=0.005; Enterobacter cloacae / cefepime, 97.0 (CLSI 2009) vs. 90.5% (EUCAST 1.3), P=0.012; Pseudomonas aeruginosa / meropenem, 88.1% (CLSI 2009) vs. 78.3% (EUCAST 1.3), P=0.002. These differences were still evident when comparing susceptibility rates according to the CLSI 2013 guideline with EUCAST 3.1 guideline. For P. aeruginosa and imipenem, a trend towards a lower antibiotic susceptibility rate in ICUs compared to general wards turned into a significant difference after the change to EUCAST: 87.9% vs. 79.8%, P=0.08 (CLSI 2009) and 86.3% vs. 76.8%, P=0.048 (EUCAST 1.3).
The change of AST guidelines from CLSI to EUCAST led to a clinically relevant decrease of susceptibility rates in cumulative antibiograms for defined species/drug combinations, particularly in those with considerable differences in clinical susceptibility breakpoints between the two guidelines.
我们研究了从美国临床和实验室标准协会(CLSI)指南变更为欧洲抗菌药物敏感性试验委员会(EUCAST)指南是否会影响瑞士一家三级护理医院的累积抗菌谱。
分析了在将AST解释从CLSI 2009变更为EUCAST 1.3(2011)指南之前(时期A)和之后(时期B)的一年内收集的非重复分离株的抗生素敏感性。此外,根据CLSI 2009、CLSI 2013和EUCAST 3.1(2013)指南对时期B的分离株进行重新解释。
大多数菌种/药物组合在比较时期A和时期B时,药敏率没有差异。然而,在一些革兰氏阴性杆菌中,在时期B内比较CLSI 2009和EUCAST 1.3时,观察到药敏率降低:大肠埃希菌/头孢吡肟,95.8%(CLSI 2009)对93.1%(EUCAST 1.3),P=0.005;阴沟肠杆菌/头孢吡肟,97.0(CLSI 2009)对90.5%(EUCAST 1.3),P=0.012;铜绿假单胞菌/美罗培南,88.1%(CLSI 2009)对78.3%(EUCAST 1.3),P=0.002。根据CLSI 2013指南与EUCAST 3.1指南比较药敏率时,这些差异仍然明显。对于铜绿假单胞菌和亚胺培南,与普通病房相比,重症监护病房抗生素药敏率较低的趋势在变更为EUCAST后变成了显著差异:87.9%对79.8%,P=0.08(CLSI 2009)和86.3%对76.8%,P=0.048(EUCAST 1.3)。
从CLSI指南变更为EUCAST指南导致特定菌种/药物组合的累积抗菌谱中药敏率出现具有临床意义的下降,特别是在两种指南临床药敏折点存在显著差异的那些组合中。