Suppr超能文献

儿童外源性支气管哮喘的特异性诊断

Specific diagnosis of exogenous bronchial asthma in children.

作者信息

Stafanger G, Andersen J K, Koch C, Schwartz B, Osterballe O

出版信息

Allergy. 1986 Feb;41(2):110-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1986.tb00286.x.

Abstract

Twenty-six children with exogenous asthma were studied by case history (CH), skin tests (ST), allergen-specific serum IgE (RAST), basophil histamine release (HR), and bronchial provocation tests (BPT). Nine standardized allergens were used from the following groups: house dust mite, animal dander, pollen, and mould fungi. For each allergen, the same batch was used throughout for all in vivo and in vitro studies, and the tests were carried out in a controlled, double-blinded manner, independent of each other. Different allergen concentrations were used and the results graded on a semi-quantitative scale. Approximately 120 comparable investigations, using in vivo and in vitro tests were carried out, followed by calculations of the sensitivity and specificity for each test alone, as well as for various combinations of tests, at various allergen-concentrations, and compared with the result of BPT, i.e. the true diagnosis. In this way the results could be used to directly compare the diagnostic value of each test, and combinations of tests. In general, a careful CH combined with ST gave the most reliable results. RAST was the most unreliable single analysis. When pollen or mite allergy was suspected, a combination of ST with either RAST or HR gave a further diagnostic reliability. HR as a single analysis did not seem to offer advantages over existing methods. None of the tests, or combinations of tests offered 100% sensitivity and specificity. By altering the concentration of allergen, the sensitivity, or specificity could be increased, but only at the expense of a decrease in the other. BPT is still necessary in many instances when a specific diagnosis is required.

摘要

对26名外源性哮喘患儿进行了病史(CH)、皮肤试验(ST)、变应原特异性血清IgE(RAST)、嗜碱性粒细胞组胺释放(HR)及支气管激发试验(BPT)研究。使用了来自以下组别的9种标准化变应原:屋尘螨、动物皮屑、花粉和霉菌。对于每种变应原,在所有体内和体外研究中均使用同一批次,并且试验以对照、双盲方式独立进行。使用了不同的变应原浓度,并以半定量 scale 对结果进行分级。进行了约120项使用体内和体外试验的可比研究,随后计算了每种试验单独以及试验的各种组合在不同变应原浓度下的敏感性和特异性,并与BPT结果(即真实诊断)进行比较。通过这种方式,结果可用于直接比较每种试验及试验组合的诊断价值。一般来说,仔细的CH结合ST可得出最可靠的结果。RAST是最不可靠的单项分析。当怀疑花粉或螨过敏时,ST与RAST或HR的组合可提高诊断可靠性。HR作为单项分析似乎并不比现有方法更具优势。没有一种试验或试验组合具有100%的敏感性和特异性。通过改变变应原浓度,敏感性或特异性可以提高,但只能以牺牲另一方为代价。在许多需要进行特异性诊断的情况下,BPT仍然是必要的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验