Suppr超能文献

与传统的体外吻合术式相比,腹腔镜下远端胃切除术后新引入的腔内吻合术具有安全可行的手术效果。

Surgical outcomes in the newly introduced phase of intracorporeal anastomosis following laparoscopic distal gastrectomy is safe and feasible compared with established procedures of extracorporeal anastomosis.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2014 Apr;28(4):1250-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3315-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (TLDG) with intracorporeal anastomosis has been introduced to achieve safer anastomosis with good vision, and a small wound. However, little is known about the surgical outcomes of newly introduced TLDG compared with established procedures of laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy (LADG) with extracorporeal anastomosis.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 114 patients who underwent laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) between January 2010 and September 2012. The patients were classified into two groups according to the approach of reconstruction (LADG group: n = 74; TLDG group: n = 40). The parameters analyzed included patients, operation details, and operative outcomes.

RESULTS

No complication was observed in the TLDG group. Surgical outcomes of the TLDG group, such as mean operation time, estimated blood loss, and rate of conversion to laparotomy were not inferior to the LADG group. Furthermore, postoperative hospital stay of the TLDG group was significantly shorter than the LADG group (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Surgical outcomes in the newly introduced phase of TLDG were safe as well as feasible compared with established LADG. TLDG has several advantages over LADG, such as shorter post-hospital stay, no incidence of operative complication, adequate working space, and small wound size. Although prospective, randomized control studies are warranted, we submit that TLDG can be used as a standard procedure for LDG.

摘要

背景

全腹腔镜下远端胃切除术(TLDG)联合腔内吻合术的应用,旨在实现更安全的吻合,具有良好的视野和较小的创伤。然而,与传统的腹腔镜辅助胃切除术(LADG)联合体外吻合术相比,新引入的 TLDG 的手术效果知之甚少。

方法

本回顾性研究纳入了 2010 年 1 月至 2012 年 9 月期间接受腹腔镜远端胃切除术(LDG)的 114 例患者。根据重建方法将患者分为两组:LADG 组(n = 74)和 TLDG 组(n = 40)。分析的参数包括患者、手术细节和手术结果。

结果

TLDG 组无并发症发生。TLDG 组的手术结果,如平均手术时间、估计出血量和中转开腹率,与 LADG 组相当。此外,TLDG 组的术后住院时间明显短于 LADG 组(p < 0.05)。

结论

与已确立的 LADG 相比,新引入的 TLDG 阶段的手术结果是安全可行的。TLDG 相对于 LADG 具有几个优势,如术后住院时间更短、无手术并发症、充足的手术空间和较小的手术切口。虽然需要前瞻性、随机对照研究来证实,但我们认为 TLDG 可以作为 LDG 的标准手术方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验