Suppr超能文献

美国使用冷冻保存的同种异体腹主动脉移植物进行主动脉重建。

The use of cryopreserved aortoiliac allograft for aortic reconstruction in the United States.

机构信息

Division of Vascular Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif.

Division of Vascular Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2014 Mar;59(3):669-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.09.009. Epub 2013 Nov 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Aortic infections, even with treatment, have a high mortality and risk of recurrent infection and limb loss. Cryopreserved aortoiliac allograft (CAA) has been proposed for aortic reconstruction to improve outcomes in this high-risk population.

METHODS

A multicenter study using a standardized database was performed at 14 of the 20 highest volume institutions that used CAA for aortic reconstruction in the setting of infection or those at high risk for prosthetic graft infection.

RESULTS

Two hundred twenty patients (mean age, 65; male:female, 1.6/1) were treated since 2002 for culture positive aortic graft infection (60%), culture negative aortic graft infection (16%), enteric fistula/erosion (15%), infected pseudoaneurysm adjacent to the aortic graft (4%), and other (4%). Intraop cultures indicated infection in 66%. Distal anastomosis was to the femoral artery and iliac. Mean hospital length of stay was 24 days, and 30-day mortality was 9%. Complications occurred in 24% and included persistent sepsis (n = 17), CAA thrombosis (n = 9), CAA rupture (n = 8), recurrent CAA/aortic infection (n = 8), CAA pseudoaneurysm (n = 6), recurrence of aortoenteric fistula (n = 4), and compartment syndrome (n = 1). Patients with full graft excision had significantly better outcomes. Ten (5%) patients required allograft explant. Mean follow-up was 30 ± 3 months. Freedom from graft-related complications, graft explant, and limb loss was 80%, 88%, and 97%, respectively, at 5 years. Primary graft patency was 97% at 5 years, and patient survival was 75% at 1 year and 51% at 5 years.

CONCLUSIONS

This largest study of CAA indicates that CAA allows aortic reconstruction in the setting of infection or those at high risk for infection with lower early and long-term morbidity and mortality than other previously reported treatment options. Repair with CAA is associated with low rates of aneurysm formation, recurrent infection, aortic blowout, and limb loss. We believe that CAA should be considered a first line treatment of aortic infections.

摘要

背景

即使经过治疗,主动脉感染的死亡率和复发感染及肢体丧失的风险仍然很高。冷冻保存的同种异体主动脉-髂动脉移植物(CAA)已被提议用于主动脉重建,以改善高危人群的治疗效果。

方法

在使用 CAA 进行感染性或高感染风险的主动脉重建的 20 家最大容量机构中的 14 家进行了一项多中心研究,该研究使用标准化数据库进行。

结果

自 2002 年以来,共有 220 例患者(平均年龄 65 岁;男女比例 1.6/1)因培养阳性的主动脉移植物感染(60%)、培养阴性的主动脉移植物感染(16%)、肠瘘/侵蚀(15%)、邻近主动脉移植物的感染性假性动脉瘤(4%)和其他(4%)接受治疗。术中培养提示感染 66%。远端吻合至股动脉和髂动脉。平均住院时间为 24 天,30 天死亡率为 9%。并发症发生率为 24%,包括持续性败血症(n=17)、CAA 血栓形成(n=9)、CAA 破裂(n=8)、复发性 CAA/主动脉感染(n=8)、CAA 假性动脉瘤(n=6)、再发肠-主动脉瘘(n=4)和间隔综合征(n=1)。行全移植物切除的患者结局显著改善。10 例(5%)患者需要进行同种异体移植物切除。平均随访 30±3 个月。5 年时,移植物相关并发症、移植物切除和肢体丧失的无复发率分别为 80%、88%和 97%。5 年时,原发移植物通畅率为 97%,1 年和 5 年时患者生存率分别为 75%和 51%。

结论

这项最大规模的 CAA 研究表明,与其他先前报道的治疗方法相比,CAA 可在感染或感染风险高的情况下进行主动脉重建,其早期和长期发病率和死亡率更低。CAA 修复与动脉瘤形成、复发感染、主动脉破裂和肢体丧失的发生率低相关。我们认为 CAA 应被视为治疗主动脉感染的一线治疗方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验