• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估淋巴水肿和脂肪水肿治疗的患者相关结局:一种新获益工具的开发和验证。

Evaluation of patient-relevant outcomes of lymphedema and lipedema treatment: development and validation of a new benefit tool.

机构信息

CVderm - German Center for Health Services Research in Dermatology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

CVderm - German Center for Health Services Research in Dermatology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2014 Jan;47(1):100-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2013.10.009. Epub 2013 Oct 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejvs.2013.10.009
PMID:24239143
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Patient-relevant treatment benefit is traditionally measured with health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instruments. The Patient Benefit Index (PBI) methodology allows for a more direct measurement, with the patients rating both importance and achievement of treatment goals. Here, we developed and validated a PBI version specific for the assessment of benefit in lymphedema and lipedema treatment (PBI-L).

METHODS

The development included five steps: (1) open item collection; (2) consensus of items in a multidisciplinary expert panel; (3) application of the German PBI-L in a cross-sectional study (n = 301); (4) translation into English; (5) application of the English PBI-L in a randomized clinical trial (n = 82). Subscales were developed using factor analysis. Construct validity was analyzed by correlating PBI-L and convergent criteria such as HRQoL and quality of care. To test for responsiveness, the association to change in HRQoL measures was computed.

RESULTS

Floor and ceiling effects were low. There were few missing values. Two well-interpretable subscales were found with Cronbach's alpha >0.8 each. Global and subscale scores correlated with convergent criteria and with change in disease-specific HRQoL, but not with change in generic HRQoL.

CONCLUSIONS

The PBI-L is an internally consistent, valid, and responsive instrument for the assessment of patient-relevant benefit of edema treatment.

摘要

目的

传统上,患者相关的治疗获益是通过健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)工具来衡量的。患者获益指数(PBI)方法允许更直接的测量,患者对治疗目标的重要性和实现程度进行评分。在这里,我们开发并验证了一种专门用于评估淋巴水肿和脂肪水肿治疗获益的 PBI 版本(PBI-L)。

方法

该开发包括五个步骤:(1)开放式项目收集;(2)多学科专家小组对项目达成共识;(3)在横断面研究(n=301)中应用德国 PBI-L;(4)翻译成英文;(5)在随机临床试验(n=82)中应用英文 PBI-L。使用因子分析开发子量表。通过将 PBI-L 与 HRQoL 和护理质量等趋同标准相关联,分析结构有效性。为了测试反应性,计算与 HRQoL 测量变化的关联。

结果

地板和天花板效应较低。缺失值较少。发现了两个可解释性良好的子量表,每个子量表的克朗巴赫系数均大于 0.8。总体和子量表评分与趋同标准以及疾病特异性 HRQoL 的变化相关,但与通用 HRQoL 的变化无关。

结论

PBI-L 是一种内部一致、有效且敏感的评估水肿治疗患者相关获益的工具。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of patient-relevant outcomes of lymphedema and lipedema treatment: development and validation of a new benefit tool.评估淋巴水肿和脂肪水肿治疗的患者相关结局:一种新获益工具的开发和验证。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2014 Jan;47(1):100-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2013.10.009. Epub 2013 Oct 22.
2
Validation of the patient benefit index for the assessment of patient-relevant benefit in the treatment of psoriasis.验证患者获益指数在评估银屑病治疗中患者相关获益的应用。
Arch Dermatol Res. 2012 Aug;304(6):433-41. doi: 10.1007/s00403-012-1256-y. Epub 2012 Jun 22.
3
An Important Tool in Lymphedema Management: Validation of Turkish Version of the Patient Benefit Index-Lymphedema.在淋巴水肿管理中的重要工具:土耳其版患者受益指数-淋巴水肿的验证。
Lymphat Res Biol. 2020 Feb;18(1):49-55. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2018.0036. Epub 2019 May 30.
4
Measurement of patient-relevant benefits in the treatment of chronic hand eczema--a novel approach.慢性手部湿疹治疗中与患者相关益处的测量——一种新方法。
Contact Dermatitis. 2009 Jul;61(1):39-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2009.01536.x.
5
Development and validation of the Patient Benefit Index for peripheral arterial disease.外周动脉疾病患者获益指数的开发与验证
Vasa. 2018 Apr;47(3):219-226. doi: 10.1024/0301-1526/a000687. Epub 2018 Jan 25.
6
Measuring patient-relevant benefits in pruritus treatment: development and validation of a specific outcomes tool.测量瘙痒治疗中的患者相关获益:特定结局工具的开发和验证。
Br J Dermatol. 2009 Nov;161(5):1143-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2009.09328.x.
7
Patient benefit index (PBI) in the treatment of psoriasis--results of the National Care Study "PsoHealth".患者获益指数(PBI)在银屑病治疗中的应用——“PsoHealth”国家护理研究结果。
Eur J Dermatol. 2013 Apr 1;23(2):212-7. doi: 10.1684/ejd.2013.1988.
8
Development, validation and clinical use of the FLQA-I, a disease-specific quality of life questionnaire for patients with lymphedema.淋巴水肿患者疾病特异性生活质量问卷FLQA-I的开发、验证及临床应用
Vasa. 2005 Feb;34(1):31-5. doi: 10.1024/0301-1526.34.1.31.
9
Benefit evaluation in vitiligo treatment: development and validation of a patient-defined outcome questionnaire.白癜风治疗中的获益评估:一份患者定义的结局问卷的开发与验证
Dermatology. 2008;217(2):101-6. doi: 10.1159/000128992. Epub 2008 May 2.
10
Translation and psychometric evaluation of the simplified Chinese-version Endometriosis Health Profile-30.简化中文版子宫内膜异位症健康状况量表-30 的翻译与心理计量学评估。
Hum Reprod. 2013 Mar;28(3):691-7. doi: 10.1093/humrep/des426. Epub 2012 Dec 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of a modular patient-reported outcome and experience measure on patient needs and benefits in CLL (PBI-CLL).关于慢性淋巴细胞白血病患者需求与获益的模块化患者报告结局与体验测量工具(PBI-CLL)的开发。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2025 Apr 29;9(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s41687-025-00882-5.
2
The effect of complex decongestive physiotherapy applied with different compression pressures on skin and subcutaneous tissue thickness in individuals with breast cancer-related lymphedema: a double-blinded randomized comparison trial.不同压力的综合消肿物理疗法对乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿患者皮肤和皮下组织厚度的影响:一项双盲随机比较试验。
Support Care Cancer. 2023 Jun 7;31(7):383. doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-07843-y.
3
Measuring Quality of Life in Hidradenitis Suppurativa: Development and Validation of a Disease-specific Patient-reported Outcome Measure for Practice and Research.
在化脓性汗腺炎中测量生活质量:用于实践和研究的疾病特异性患者报告结局测量工具的制定和验证。
Acta Derm Venereol. 2023 Jan 31;103:adv00859. doi: 10.2340/actadv.v102.2485.
4
Patients' perspective on supposedly patient-relevant process and outcome parameters: a cross-sectional survey within the 'PRO patients study'.患者对所谓的与患者相关的过程和结果参数的看法:在“PRO 患者研究”中的横断面调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jan 14;22(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07437-6.
5
Standard of care for lipedema in the United States.美国脂性水肿的护理标准。
Phlebology. 2021 Dec;36(10):779-796. doi: 10.1177/02683555211015887. Epub 2021 May 28.
6
Liposuction treatment improves disease-specific quality of life in lipoedema patients.抽脂治疗可改善脂肪水肿患者的疾病特异性生活质量。
Int Wound J. 2021 Dec;18(6):923-931. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13608. Epub 2021 May 5.
7
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Lymphedema: A Systematic Review and COSMIN Analysis.患者报告结局测量在淋巴水肿中的应用:系统评价和 COMSIN 分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Mar;28(3):1656-1668. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-09346-0. Epub 2020 Nov 28.
8
Patient-relevant outcomes: what are we talking about? A scoping review to improve conceptual clarity.患者相关结局:我们在讨论什么?一项改善概念清晰度的范围综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jun 29;20(1):596. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05442-9.
9
Treatment needs and expectations for Fabry disease in France: development of a new Patient Needs Questionnaire.法国法布瑞病的治疗需求和期望:新型患者需求问卷的制定。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2019 Dec 4;14(1):284. doi: 10.1186/s13023-019-1254-7.
10
Patient-relevant needs and treatment goals in nail psoriasis.甲银屑病中与患者相关的需求和治疗目标
Qual Life Res. 2016 May;25(5):1179-88. doi: 10.1007/s11136-015-1136-y. Epub 2015 Oct 3.