Department of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), Birmingham, AL, USA.
Public Health. 2013 Nov;127(11):994-1004. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2013.08.005. Epub 2013 Nov 14.
Understanding and effectively addressing persistent health disparities in minority communities requires a clear picture of members' concerns and priorities. This study was intended to engage residents in urban and rural communities in order to identify environmental health priorities. Specific emphasis was placed on how the communities: defined the term environment; their perceptions of environmental exposures as affecting their health; specific priorities in their communities; and differences in urban versus rural populations.
A community-engaged approach was used to develop and implement focus groups and compare environmental health priorities in urban versus rural communities.
A total of eight focus groups were conducted: four in rural and four in urban communities. Topics included: defining the term environment; how the environment may affect health; and environmental priorities within their communities, using both open discussion and a predefined list. Data were analysed both qualitatively and quantitatively to identify patterns and trends.
There were important areas of overlap in priorities between urban and rural communities; both emphasized the importance of the social environment and shared a concern over air pollution from industrial sources. In contrast, for urban focus groups, abandoned houses and their social and physical sequelae were a high priority while concerns about adequate sewer and water services and road maintenance were high priorities in rural communities.
This study was able to identify environmental health priorities in urban versus rural minority communities. In contrast to some previous risk perception research, the results of this study suggest prioritization of tangible, known risks in everyday life instead of rare, disaster-related events, even in communities that have recently experienced devastating damage from tornadoes. The findings can help inform future efforts to study, understand and effectively address environmental issues, and are particularly relevant to developing effective community-based strategies in vulnerable populations.
要了解并有效解决少数族裔社区中持续存在的健康差异问题,必须清楚了解成员关注的问题和优先事项。本研究旨在让城市和农村社区的居民参与进来,以确定环境健康的优先事项。特别强调了社区如何:定义“环境”一词;他们认为哪些环境暴露会影响他们的健康;社区的具体优先事项;以及城市和农村社区之间的差异。
采用社区参与的方法来制定和实施焦点小组,并比较城市和农村社区的环境健康优先事项。
共进行了 8 个焦点小组:4 个在农村社区,4 个在城市社区。主题包括:定义“环境”一词;环境如何影响健康;以及使用开放式讨论和预先确定的清单,在其社区内确定环境优先事项。对数据进行定性和定量分析,以识别模式和趋势。
城市和农村社区的优先事项有很多重叠的地方;两者都强调了社会环境的重要性,并共同关注工业来源的空气污染问题。相比之下,对于城市焦点小组来说,废弃房屋及其社会和物理后果是一个高度优先事项,而农村社区则高度关注充足的污水和供水服务以及道路维护问题。
本研究能够确定城市和农村少数族裔社区的环境健康优先事项。与一些先前的风险感知研究不同,本研究的结果表明,优先考虑日常生活中有形的、已知的风险,而不是罕见的、与灾难相关的事件,即使是在最近遭受龙卷风毁灭性破坏的社区也是如此。这些发现有助于为未来研究、理解和有效解决环境问题提供信息,并且对于在弱势群体中制定有效的基于社区的策略尤为相关。