• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2007年至2011年英格兰初级保健电子健康记录中吸烟流行率估计值与全国人口调查数据的有效性比较。

Validity of smoking prevalence estimates from primary care electronic health records compared with national population survey data for England, 2007 to 2011.

作者信息

Booth Helen P, Prevost A Toby, Gulliford Martin C

出版信息

Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013 Dec;22(12):1357-61. doi: 10.1002/pds.3537.

DOI:10.1002/pds.3537
PMID:24243711
Abstract

PURPOSE

Primary care electronic health records (EHRs) are increasingly used as a resource for epidemiological research. Cigarette smoking is an important variable in many epidemiological studies. We evaluated the validity of smoking records in primary care EHRs by comparing estimates for smoking prevalence from primary care EHRs with national health survey data.

METHODS

Data were analysed for adults over 30 years of age from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) in comparison with data from the Health Survey for England between 2007 and 2011. Electronic health records in the CPRD were searched for records of smoking status and smoking cessation treatment. Annual age- and sex-standardised prevalence of current-, non- and former smoking were calculated, and compared with equivalent data from the Health Survey for England (HSE).

RESULTS

The difference between estimates of current smoking in CPRD and HSE was generally <1% from 2007 to 2011. In 2011, the prevalence of current smoking in men was: CPRD 24.3%, HSE 24.2%. The mean difference was 0.1% (95% confidence interval −1.5 to 1.7%). In women, current smoking prevalence was CPRD 20.3%, HSE 19.0%; mean difference 1.3% (0.0 to 2.6%). Estimates for former smoking were lower in CPRD than HSE for men (CPRD 26.7%, HSE 31.3%) and women (CPRD 22.9%, HSE 25.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Prevalence estimates for current smoking, and non-smoking, from primary care EHRs are similar to those from nationally representative surveys, but former smoking may be under-recorded.

摘要

目的

基层医疗电子健康记录(EHRs)越来越多地被用作流行病学研究的资源。吸烟是许多流行病学研究中的一个重要变量。我们通过比较基层医疗EHRs中的吸烟流行率估计值与全国健康调查数据,评估了基层医疗EHRs中吸烟记录的有效性。

方法

分析了临床实践研究数据链(CPRD)中30岁以上成年人的数据,并与2007年至2011年英格兰健康调查的数据进行了比较。在CPRD的电子健康记录中搜索吸烟状况和戒烟治疗的记录。计算了当前、非吸烟和曾经吸烟的年度年龄和性别标准化流行率,并与英格兰健康调查(HSE)的等效数据进行了比较。

结果

2007年至2011年,CPRD和HSE中当前吸烟估计值的差异一般<1%。2011年,男性当前吸烟流行率为:CPRD 24.3%,HSE 24.2%。平均差异为0.1%(95%置信区间-1.5至1.7%)。在女性中,当前吸烟流行率为CPRD 20.3%,HSE 19.0%;平均差异为1.3%(0.0至2.6%)。CPRD中曾经吸烟的估计值低于HSE中的男性(CPRD 26.7%,HSE 31.3%)和女性(CPRD 22.9%,HSE 25.0%)。

结论

基层医疗EHRs中当前吸烟和非吸烟的流行率估计值与全国代表性调查的估计值相似,但曾经吸烟可能记录不足。

相似文献

1
Validity of smoking prevalence estimates from primary care electronic health records compared with national population survey data for England, 2007 to 2011.2007年至2011年英格兰初级保健电子健康记录中吸烟流行率估计值与全国人口调查数据的有效性比较。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013 Dec;22(12):1357-61. doi: 10.1002/pds.3537.
2
Smoker, ex-smoker or non-smoker? The validity of routinely recorded smoking status in UK primary care: a cross-sectional study.吸烟者、曾经吸烟者还是非吸烟者?英国初级医疗中常规记录的吸烟状况的有效性:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2014 Apr 23;4(4):e004958. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-004958.
3
Validity of estimated prevalence of decreased kidney function and renal replacement therapy from primary care electronic health records compared with national survey and registry data in the United Kingdom.与英国国家调查和登记数据相比,利用基层医疗电子健康记录评估肾功能下降和肾脏替代治疗患病率的有效性。
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2017 Apr 1;32(suppl_2):ii142-ii150. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfw318.
4
How is nicotine vaping product (e-cigarette) use monitored in primary care electronic health records in the United Kingdom? An exploratory analysis of Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD).在英国,初级保健电子健康记录中如何监测尼古丁蒸气产品(电子烟)的使用情况?对临床实践研究数据链(CPRD)的探索性分析。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Nov 16;23(1):2263. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17200-7.
5
Differences in recording of cancer diagnosis between datasets in England: A population-based study of linked cancer registration, hospital, and primary care data.英格兰各数据集之间癌症诊断记录的差异:一项基于人群的癌症登记、医院和初级保健数据关联研究。
Cancer Epidemiol. 2025 Feb;94:102703. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2024.102703. Epub 2024 Nov 29.
6
Comparison of antibiotic prescribing records in two UK primary care electronic health record systems: cohort study using CPRD GOLD and CPRD Aurum databases.比较两个英国初级保健电子健康记录系统中的抗生素处方记录:使用 CPRD GOLD 和 CPRD Aurum 数据库的队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jun 22;10(6):e038767. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038767.
7
Evaluating the quality of prostate cancer diagnosis recording in CPRD GOLD and CPRD Aurum primary care databases for observational research: A study using linked English electronic health records.评估CPRD GOLD和CPRD Aurum初级保健数据库中前列腺癌诊断记录质量以用于观察性研究:一项使用关联英文电子健康记录的研究。
Cancer Epidemiol. 2025 Feb;94:102715. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2024.102715. Epub 2024 Nov 30.
8
Representativeness and optimal use of body mass index (BMI) in the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD).英国临床实践研究数据库(CPRD)中体重指数(BMI)的代表性和最佳使用。
BMJ Open. 2013 Sep 13;3(9):e003389. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003389.
9
Development of an algorithm for determining smoking status and behaviour over the life course from UK electronic primary care records.开发一种从英国电子初级保健记录中确定一生中吸烟状况和行为的算法。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 Jan 5;17(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12911-016-0400-6.
10
Persons diagnosed with COVID-19 in England in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD): a cohort description.在英格兰临床实践研究数据库(CPRD)中诊断患有 COVID-19 的患者:队列描述。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jan 11;14(1):e073866. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073866.

引用本文的文献

1
Pain and Sedative Medication Use Among Individuals With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study.炎症性肠病患者的疼痛与镇静药物使用:一项基于全国人口的队列研究
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2025 Oct;62(7):732-742. doi: 10.1111/apt.70247. Epub 2025 Jul 2.
2
Inflammatory diseases and risk of lung cancer among individuals who have never smoked.从不吸烟者中的炎症性疾病与肺癌风险
Nat Commun. 2025 Jun 2;16(1):5095. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-56803-z.
3
Smoking is a Risk Factor for Autoimmune Hepatitis: An English Registry-Based Case-Control Study.
吸烟是自身免疫性肝炎的一个风险因素:一项基于英国登记处的病例对照研究。
Clin Epidemiol. 2024 Jan 31;16:23-30. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S439219. eCollection 2024.
4
How is nicotine vaping product (e-cigarette) use monitored in primary care electronic health records in the United Kingdom? An exploratory analysis of Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD).在英国,初级保健电子健康记录中如何监测尼古丁蒸气产品(电子烟)的使用情况?对临床实践研究数据链(CPRD)的探索性分析。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Nov 16;23(1):2263. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17200-7.
5
Persistent high prevalence of modifiable cardiovascular risk factors among patients with osteoarthritis in the UK in 1992-2017.1992-2017 年期间,英国骨关节炎患者中可改变的心血管危险因素持续高发。
RMD Open. 2023 Aug;9(3). doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2023-003298.
6
Are There Ethnic Differences in Recorded Features among Patients Subsequently Diagnosed with Cancer? An English Longitudinal Data-Linked Study.后续被诊断为癌症的患者在记录特征方面是否存在种族差异?一项英国纵向数据关联研究。
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jun 7;15(12):3100. doi: 10.3390/cancers15123100.
7
Physiologic signatures within six hours of hospitalization identify acute illness phenotypes.住院6小时内的生理特征可识别急性疾病表型。
PLOS Digit Health. 2022;1(10). doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000110. Epub 2022 Oct 13.
8
Real-World Effectiveness of Beta-Blockers versus Other Antihypertensives in Reducing All-Cause Mortality and Cardiovascular Events.β受体阻滞剂与其他降压药在降低全因死亡率和心血管事件方面的真实世界疗效比较。
Int J Clin Pract. 2022 Jul 30;2022:6124559. doi: 10.1155/2022/6124559. eCollection 2022.
9
The use of electronic health records to inform cancer surveillance efforts: a scoping review and test of indicators for public health surveillance of cancer prevention and control.利用电子健康记录为癌症监测工作提供信息:一项用于癌症预防和控制公共卫生监测的指标的探索性综述和测试。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Apr 6;22(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01831-8.
10
Contributions of side effects to contraceptive discontinuation and method switch among Kenyan women: a prospective cohort study.肯尼亚女性中副作用对避孕措施停用和方法转换的影响:一项前瞻性队列研究。
BJOG. 2022 May;129(6):926-937. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17032. Epub 2022 Jan 18.