Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London.
School of Psychology, University of Sussex.
Health Psychol. 2014 Sep;33(9):998-1002. doi: 10.1037/a0033507. Epub 2013 Nov 18.
To evaluate an intervention based on implementation intention principles designed to increase uptake of colorectal cancer screening, and to examine differential efficacy by socioeconomic deprivation.
In England, adults aged between 60 and 69 years are invited for biennial fecal occult blood testing. A test kit and an information leaflet are mailed to each individual by the "Hubs" that deliver the national screening program. In the intervention group, three preformulated implementation intentions, based on known barriers to carrying out the test, were added to the information leaflet. Over a 12-week period, each week was randomly allocated to either the intervention (n = 12,414 invitations) or the control condition (n = 10,768), with uptake recorded at the Hub. Socioeconomic deprivation of each individual's area of residence was categorized into tertiles.
There was no overall difference in uptake between control (40.4%) and intervention (39.7%) conditions, odds ratio (OR) = 0.97, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.91, 1.04]. There was an interaction with deprivation, OR = 1.11, 95% CI [1.04, 1.18], but the positive effect observed in the lowest socioeconomic status (SES) tertile was small (35.2% vs. 33.0%), OR = 1.103, 95% CI [1.01, 1.21], and offset by a negative effect in the least deprived tertile (45.6% vs. 48.2%), OR = 0.90, 95% CI [0.82, 0.99]. The intervention had no significant effect in the middle tertile (38.9% vs. 40.8%), OR = 0.92, 95% CI [0.81, 1.04].
Preformulated implementation intentions did not increase overall colorectal cancer screening uptake and failed to make a sufficiently large impact on uptake among lower SES groups to merit their future use in this context.
评估一项基于实施意向原则的干预措施,该措施旨在提高结直肠癌筛查的参与率,并检验社会经济剥夺程度的差异效果。
在英格兰,60 至 69 岁的成年人每两年接受一次粪便潜血检测。“中心”会向每个人邮寄检测试剂盒和信息传单,这些“中心”负责提供国家筛查计划。在干预组中,在信息传单中添加了三个基于进行测试的已知障碍的预设实施意向。在 12 周的时间内,每周随机分配到干预组(n = 12414 份邀请)或对照组(n = 10768 份),在“中心”记录参与率。每个个体居住地区的社会经济剥夺程度分为三分位。
在控制组(40.4%)和干预组(39.7%)之间,参与率没有总体差异,优势比(OR)=0.97,95%置信区间(CI)[0.91, 1.04]。存在与剥夺程度的交互作用,OR=1.11,95%CI[1.04, 1.18],但在社会经济地位最低的三分位中观察到的积极影响较小(35.2%比 33.0%),OR=1.103,95%CI[1.01, 1.21],而在最不富裕的三分位中则存在负面影响(45.6%比 48.2%),OR=0.90,95%CI[0.82, 0.99]。干预措施在中间三分位(38.9%比 40.8%)没有显著效果,OR=0.92,95%CI[0.81, 1.04]。
预设的实施意向并没有提高结直肠癌筛查的总体参与率,也没有对社会经济地位较低的群体的参与率产生足够大的影响,因此不值得在这种情况下将来使用。