• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

实施意图与结直肠癌筛查:在安全网诊所进行的一项随机试验。

Implementation intentions and colorectal screening: a randomized trial in safety-net clinics.

作者信息

Greiner K Allen, Daley Christine M, Epp Aaron, James Aimee, Yeh Hung-Wen, Geana Mugur, Born Wendi, Engelman Kimberly K, Shellhorn Jeremy, Hester Christina M, LeMaster Joseph, Buckles Daniel C, Ellerbeck Edward F

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine; University of Kansas Cancer Center.

Department of Family Medicine; Center for American Indian Community Health; Department of Preventive Medicine; University of Kansas Cancer Center.

出版信息

Am J Prev Med. 2014 Dec;47(6):703-14. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.08.005. Epub 2014 Nov 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.amepre.2014.08.005
PMID:25455115
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4311575/
Abstract

CONTEXT

Low-income and racial/ethnic minority populations experience disproportionate colorectal cancer (CRC) burden and poorer survival. Novel behavioral strategies are needed to improve screening rates in these groups.

BACKGROUND

The study aimed to test a theoretically based "implementation intentions" intervention for improving CRC screening among unscreened adults in urban safety-net clinics.

DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial.

SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Adults (N=470) aged ≥50 years, due for CRC screening, from urban safety-net clinics were recruited.

INTERVENTION

The intervention (conducted in 2009-2011) was delivered via touchscreen computers that tailored informational messages to decisional stage and screening barriers. The computer then randomized participants to generic health information on diet and exercise (Comparison group) or "implementation intentions" questions and planning (Experimental group) specific to the CRC screening test chosen (fecal immunochemical test or colonoscopy).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary study outcome was completion of CRC screening at 26 weeks based on test reports (analysis conducted in 2012-2013).

RESULTS

The study population had a mean age of 57 years and was 42% non-Hispanic African American, 28% non-Hispanic white, and 27% Hispanic. Those receiving the implementation intentions-based intervention had higher odds (AOR=1.83, 95% CI=1.23, 2.73) of completing CRC screening than the Comparison group. Those with higher self-efficacy for screening (AOR=1.57, 95% CI=1.03, 2.39), history of asthma (AOR=2.20, 95% CI=1.26, 3.84), no history of diabetes (AOR=1.86, 95% CI=1.21, 2.86), and reporting they had never heard that "cutting on cancer" makes it spread (AOR=1.78, 95% CI=1.16, 2.72) were more likely to complete CRC screening.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study suggest that programs incorporating an implementation intentions approach can contribute to successful completion of CRC screening even among very low-income and diverse primary care populations. Future initiatives to reduce CRC incidence and mortality disparities may be able to employ implementation intentions in large-scale efforts to encourage screening and prevention behaviors.

摘要

背景

低收入和种族/族裔少数群体承受着不成比例的结直肠癌(CRC)负担,且生存率较低。需要新的行为策略来提高这些群体的筛查率。

背景

本研究旨在测试一种基于理论的“实施意图”干预措施,以提高城市安全网诊所中未接受筛查的成年人的CRC筛查率。

设计

随机对照试验。

设置/参与者:招募了年龄≥50岁、应进行CRC筛查的城市安全网诊所的成年人(N = 470)。

干预措施

干预(于2009 - 2011年进行)通过触摸屏电脑进行,该电脑根据决策阶段和筛查障碍定制信息。然后,电脑将参与者随机分为提供饮食和运动方面的一般健康信息的组(对照组)或针对所选CRC筛查测试(粪便免疫化学测试或结肠镜检查)的“实施意图”问题及计划的组(实验组)。

主要结局指标

主要研究结局是根据测试报告在26周时完成CRC筛查(于2012 - 2013年进行分析)。

结果

研究人群的平均年龄为57岁,其中42%为非西班牙裔非裔美国人,28%为非西班牙裔白人,27%为西班牙裔。接受基于实施意图干预的人群完成CRC筛查的几率(调整后比值比[AOR]=1.83,95%置信区间[CI]=1.23,2.73)高于对照组。筛查自我效能较高(AOR = 1.57,95% CI = 1.03,2.39)、有哮喘病史(AOR = 2.20,95% CI = 1.26,3.84)、无糖尿病病史(AOR = 1.86,95% CI = 1.21,2.86)以及表示从未听说“切除癌症会使其扩散”(AOR = 1.78,95% CI = 1.16,2.72)的人更有可能完成CRC筛查。

结论

本研究结果表明,纳入实施意图方法的项目即使在非常低收入和多样化的初级保健人群中也有助于成功完成CRC筛查。未来旨在减少CRC发病率和死亡率差异的举措或许能够在大规模努力中采用实施意图来鼓励筛查和预防行为。

相似文献

1
Implementation intentions and colorectal screening: a randomized trial in safety-net clinics.实施意图与结直肠癌筛查:在安全网诊所进行的一项随机试验。
Am J Prev Med. 2014 Dec;47(6):703-14. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.08.005. Epub 2014 Nov 18.
2
Comparing the effect of a decision aid plus patient navigation with usual care on colorectal cancer screening completion in vulnerable populations: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.比较决策辅助工具加患者导航与常规护理对弱势群体结直肠癌筛查完成情况的影响:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2014 Jul 8;15:275. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-275.
3
The Effectiveness of a Physician-Only and Physician-Patient Intervention on Colorectal Cancer Screening Discussions Between Providers and African American and Latino Patients.仅医生参与及医生-患者共同参与的干预措施对医疗服务提供者与非裔美国人和拉丁裔患者之间结直肠癌筛查讨论的有效性。
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Dec;30(12):1780-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3381-8. Epub 2015 May 19.
4
Factors affecting compliance with colorectal cancer screening among households residing in the largely Haitian community of Little Haiti, Miami-Dade County, Florida: an observational study.佛罗里达州迈阿密-戴德县小海地主要为海地裔社区居民家庭中影响结直肠癌筛查依从性的因素:一项观察性研究
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 May;94(18):e806. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000806.
5
Association of Race and Socioeconomic Status With Colorectal Cancer Screening, Colorectal Cancer Risk, and Mortality in Southern US Adults.种族和社会经济地位与美国南部成年人结直肠癌筛查、结直肠癌风险和死亡率的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Dec 2;2(12):e1917995. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.17995.
6
Effect of Colonoscopy Outreach vs Fecal Immunochemical Test Outreach on Colorectal Cancer Screening Completion: A Randomized Clinical Trial.结肠镜检查外展与粪便免疫化学检测外展对结直肠癌筛查完成率的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2017 Sep 5;318(9):806-815. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.11389.
7
Fecal Immunochemical Test Screening and Risk of Colorectal Cancer Death.粪便免疫化学试验筛查与结直肠癌死亡风险。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jul 1;7(7):e2423671. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.23671.
8
Effect of Combined Patient Decision Aid and Patient Navigation vs Usual Care for Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Vulnerable Patient Population: A Randomized Clinical Trial.联合患者决策辅助工具与患者导航服务对比常规护理对弱势患者群体进行结直肠癌筛查的效果:一项随机临床试验
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Jul 1;177(7):967-974. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.1294.
9
Computer-tailored intervention increases colorectal cancer screening among low-income African Americans in primary care: Results of a randomized trial.计算机定制干预措施提高了初级保健中低收入非裔美国人的结直肠癌筛查率:一项随机试验的结果。
Prev Med. 2021 Apr;145:106449. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106449. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
10
Outreach invitations for FIT and colonoscopy improve colorectal cancer screening rates: A randomized controlled trial in a safety-net health system.粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)和结肠镜检查的外展邀请可提高结直肠癌筛查率:一项在安全网医疗系统中的随机对照试验。
Cancer. 2016 Feb 1;122(3):456-63. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29770. Epub 2015 Nov 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Characteristics of interventions aimed at reducing inequalities along the cancer continuum: A scoping review.旨在减少癌症连续过程中不平等现象的干预措施的特征:一项范围综述。
Int J Cancer. 2025 Sep 15;157(6):1043-1054. doi: 10.1002/ijc.35478. Epub 2025 May 26.
2
Evaluating digital nudge interventions for the promotion of cancer screening behavior: a systematic review and meta-analysis.评估促进癌症筛查行为的数字助推干预措施:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
BMC Med. 2025 Apr 14;23(1):214. doi: 10.1186/s12916-025-04028-8.
3
Single-round performance of colorectal cancer screening programs: a network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

本文引用的文献

1
Using implementation intentions to overcome the effect of mood on risky behaviour.利用实施意向克服情绪对冒险行为的影响。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2012 Jun;51(2):330-45. doi: 10.1348/014466610X533623. Epub 2011 Apr 7.
2
A computerized intervention to promote colorectal cancer screening for underserved populations: theoretical background and algorithm development.一项促进为服务不足人群进行结直肠癌筛查的计算机化干预措施:理论背景与算法开发
Technol Health Care. 2012;20(1):25-35. doi: 10.3233/THC-2011-0653.
3
Patient activation increases colorectal cancer screening rates: a randomized trial among low-income minority patients.
结直肠癌筛查项目的单轮效果:随机临床试验的网络荟萃分析
BMC Med. 2025 Feb 21;23(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12916-025-03948-9.
4
An Exploratory Analysis of the Role of Religion in Colorectal Cancer Screening among Safety-Net Clinic Patients.安全网诊所患者中宗教在结直肠癌筛查中的作用的探索性分析。
J Geriatr Med Gerontol. 2019;5(1). doi: 10.23937/2469-5858/1510058.
5
Social determinants of health and US cancer screening interventions: A systematic review.社会决定因素与美国癌症筛查干预措施:系统评价。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2023 Sep-Oct;73(5):461-479. doi: 10.3322/caac.21801. Epub 2023 Jun 17.
6
COLORECTAL CANCER: ASSOCIATION BETWEEN SOCIODEMOGRAPHIC VARIABLES AND THE ADHERENCE TO CANCER SCREENING.结直肠癌:社会人口统计学变量与癌症筛查依从性的关系。
Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2023 May 12;36:e1729. doi: 10.1590/0102-672020230002e1729. eCollection 2023.
7
Identifying Priorities and Strategies for Improving Colorectal Cancer Screening in Tribal Clinics.确定部落诊所改善结直肠癌筛查的优先事项和策略。
Cancer Control. 2022 Jan-Dec;29:10732748221132516. doi: 10.1177/10732748221132516.
8
Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening in Latinos and Non-Hispanic Whites.拉丁裔和非西班牙裔白人间的结直肠癌筛查差距。
Am J Prev Med. 2022 Feb;62(2):203-210. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2021.07.009. Epub 2021 Oct 11.
9
Healthcare delivery interventions to reduce cancer disparities worldwide.在全球范围内减少癌症差异的医疗保健提供干预措施。
World J Clin Oncol. 2020 Sep 24;11(9):705-722. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v11.i9.705.
10
Interventions for increasing colorectal cancer screening uptake among African-American men: A systematic review and meta-analysis.提高非裔美国男性结直肠癌筛查参与度的干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 16;15(9):e0238354. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238354. eCollection 2020.
患者激活可提高结直肠癌筛查率:一项针对低收入少数族裔患者的随机试验。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012 Jan;21(1):45-52. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0815. Epub 2011 Nov 8.
4
"Cutting" on cancer: attitudes about cancer spread and surgery among primary care patients in the U.S.A.“切除”癌症:美国初级保健患者对癌症传播和手术的态度。
Soc Sci Med. 2011 Dec;73(11):1669-73. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.09.017. Epub 2011 Oct 5.
5
Preferences for colorectal cancer screening tests and screening test use in a large multispecialty primary care practice.在一个大型多专科初级保健实践中,对结直肠癌筛查测试和筛查测试使用的偏好。
Cancer. 2012 May 15;118(10):2726-34. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26551. Epub 2011 Sep 21.
6
Durable effects of implementation intentions: reduced rates of confirmed pregnancy at 2 years.实施意向的持久效果:降低 2 年内确诊怀孕的比例。
Health Psychol. 2011 May;30(3):368-73. doi: 10.1037/a0022739.
7
Adherence to physician recommendation to colorectal cancer screening colonoscopy among Hispanics.西班牙裔人群对结直肠癌筛查结肠镜检查的医生建议的依从性。
J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Oct;26(10):1124-30. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1727-4. Epub 2011 May 4.
8
Engaging diverse underserved communities to bridge the mammography divide.让不同的服务不足社区参与进来,弥合乳腺 X 光检查的差距。
BMC Public Health. 2011 Jan 21;11:47. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-47.
9
The roles of behavioral and implementation intentions in changing physical activity in young children with low socioeconomic status.行为和实施意向在改变社会经济地位较低的幼儿身体活动中的作用。
J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2010 Jun;32(3):359-76. doi: 10.1123/jsep.32.3.359.
10
A volitional help sheet to increase physical activity in people with low socioeconomic status: A randomised exploratory trial.一份增加社会经济地位较低人群身体活动的自主帮助表:一项随机探索性试验。
Psychol Health. 2010 Dec;25(10):1129-45. doi: 10.1080/08870440903121638.