Reno Cooperative Extension, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV.
Reno Cooperative Extension, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV.
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2014 Mar-Apr;46(2):121-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2013.09.012. Epub 2013 Nov 15.
To determine changes in preschoolers' ability to distinguish between healthy and unhealthy foods and stated food preferences after participation in a nutrition education program.
Pre-post comparison/intervention study with sites clustered based on center size and language.
Preschool classrooms.
A total of 191 preschoolers from Nevada and 128 from Connecticut, New Jersey, and Oklahoma.
All 4 Kids, a 24-lesson program taught by trained instructors.
Pre- and post-assessment sum scores for identifying 18 foods; stated preference for, and distinguishing between, healthy vs unhealthy choice from 9 food pairs using a newly designed tool.
t tests; multiple linear and logistic regression models.
There was a statistically significant improvement in identification scores from pre- to post-study for both groups from Nevada (P < .001). For preference and distinguishing between healthy and unhealthy foods, no differences were noted at pretest. At posttest, significantly more intervention than comparison preschoolers indicated a preference for healthier foods (P < .006) and an ability to distinguish them (P < .03). Outcome comparison between Nevada and 3 states demonstrated generalizability of the study tool.
Participation in All 4 Kids resulted in preschoolers' increased understanding of healthy foods and changed their stated food preferences.
在参加营养教育计划后,确定学龄前儿童区分健康和不健康食品以及表达食物偏好的能力变化。
基于中心规模和语言对地点进行聚类的前后比较/干预研究。
幼儿园教室。
来自内华达州的 191 名学龄前儿童和来自康涅狄格州、新泽西州和俄克拉荷马州的 128 名儿童。
All 4 Kids,由经过培训的指导员教授的 24 节课课程。
使用新设计的工具,对 18 种食物进行识别的预评估和后评估总分;对 9 对食物中健康与不健康选择的表述偏好和区分。
t 检验;多元线性和逻辑回归模型。
两组来自内华达州的儿童在识别分数上均有统计学意义上的提高(P <.001)。对于偏好和区分健康与不健康食物,两组在预测试中均没有差异。在测试后,干预组比对照组的儿童明显更喜欢更健康的食物(P <.006),并且能够区分它们(P <.03)。内华达州与 3 个州的结果比较表明了研究工具的可推广性。
参与 All 4 Kids 使学龄前儿童对健康食品的理解有所提高,并改变了他们对食物的表述偏好。