Suppr超能文献

不确定性时刻:伦理考量与新兴污染物

MOMENTS OF UNCERTAINTY: ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS AND EMERGING CONTAMINANTS.

作者信息

Cordner Alissa, Brown Phil

机构信息

345 Boyer Ave., Whitman College, Department of Sociology.

出版信息

Sociol Forum (Randolph N J). 2013 Sep;28(3). doi: 10.1111/socf.12034.

Abstract

Science on emerging environmental health threats involves numerous ethical concerns related to scientific uncertainty about conducting, interpreting, communicating, and acting upon research findings, but the connections between ethical decision making and scientific uncertainty are under-studied in sociology. Under conditions of scientific uncertainty, researcher conduct is not fully prescribed by formal ethical codes of conduct, increasing the importance of ethical reflection by researchers, conflicts over research conduct, and reliance on informal ethical standards. This paper draws on in-depth interviews with scientists, regulators, activists, industry representatives, and fire safety experts to explore ethical considerations of using a case study of flame retardants, chemicals widely used in consumer products with potential negative health and environmental impacts. We focus on the uncertainty that arises in measuring people's exposure to these chemicals through testing of their personal environments or bodies. We identify four sources of ethical concerns relevant to scientific uncertainty: 1) choosing research questions or methods, 2) interpreting scientific results, 3) communicating results to multiple publics, and 4) applying results for policy-making. This research offers lessons about professional conduct under conditions of uncertainty, ethical research practice, democratization of scientific knowledge, and science's impact on policy.

摘要

关于新出现的环境健康威胁的科学涉及许多伦理问题,这些问题与开展、解释、传播研究结果以及根据研究结果采取行动时的科学不确定性有关,但在社会学领域,伦理决策与科学不确定性之间的联系尚未得到充分研究。在科学不确定性的情况下,正式的道德行为准则并不能完全规定研究人员的行为,这就增加了研究人员进行伦理反思、研究行为冲突以及对非正式道德标准的依赖的重要性。本文通过对科学家、监管者、活动家、行业代表和消防安全专家的深入访谈,以阻燃剂为例探讨伦理考量,阻燃剂是广泛用于消费品的化学物质,可能对健康和环境产生负面影响。我们关注的是在通过检测个人环境或身体来衡量人们接触这些化学物质时出现的不确定性。我们确定了与科学不确定性相关的四个伦理问题来源:1)选择研究问题或方法,2)解释科学结果,3)向多个公众群体传播结果,4)将结果应用于政策制定。这项研究提供了关于不确定性条件下的专业行为、伦理研究实践、科学知识民主化以及科学对政策影响的经验教训。

相似文献

1
MOMENTS OF UNCERTAINTY: ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS AND EMERGING CONTAMINANTS.
Sociol Forum (Randolph N J). 2013 Sep;28(3). doi: 10.1111/socf.12034.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
Communicating results in post-Belmont era biomonitoring studies: lessons from genetics and neuroimaging research.
Environ Res. 2015 Jan;136:363-72. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2014.10.001. Epub 2014 Nov 25.
5
The Minderoo-Monaco Commission on Plastics and Human Health.
Ann Glob Health. 2023 Mar 21;89(1):23. doi: 10.5334/aogh.4056. eCollection 2023.
6
Halogenated flame retardants: do the fire safety benefits justify the risks?
Rev Environ Health. 2010 Oct-Dec;25(4):261-305. doi: 10.1515/reveh.2010.25.4.261.
7
Decision-making under uncertainty in environmental health policy: new approaches.
Environ Health Prev Med. 2019 Sep 14;24(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12199-019-0813-9.
8
Reflexive Research Ethics for Environmental Health and Justice: Academics and Movement-Building.
Soc Mov Stud. 2012;11(2):161-176. doi: 10.1080/14742837.2012.664898. Epub 2012 Apr 2.
9
Chemical regulation on fire: rapid policy advances on flame retardants.
Environ Sci Technol. 2013 Jul 2;47(13):7067-76. doi: 10.1021/es3036237. Epub 2013 Jun 12.
10
Ethical decision-making and role conflict in managing a scientific laboratory.
Account Res. 2024 Nov;31(8):1198-1221. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2023.2236553. Epub 2023 Jul 28.

引用本文的文献

1
The ethical aspects of exposome research: a systematic review.
Exposome. 2023 Apr 12;3(1):osad004. doi: 10.1093/exposome/osad004.
2
Uncertainty, scarcity and transparency: Public health ethics and risk communication in a pandemic.
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2022 Oct 1;16:100374. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2022.100374. eCollection 2022 Dec.
4
Untangling Trustworthiness and Uncertainty in Science: Implications for Science Education.
Sci Educ (Dordr). 2022;31(5):1155-1180. doi: 10.1007/s11191-022-00322-6. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
5
Environmental Chemicals and Public Sociology: Engaged Scholarship on Highly Fluorinated Compounds.
Environ Sociol. 2019;5(4):339-351. doi: 10.1080/23251042.2019.1629271. Epub 2019 Jun 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Undone Science: Charting Social Movement and Civil Society Challenges to Research Agenda Setting.
Sci Technol Human Values. 2010 Jul 1;35(4):444-473. doi: 10.1177/0162243909345836. Epub 2009 Oct 27.
4
Reflexive Research Ethics for Environmental Health and Justice: Academics and Movement-Building.
Soc Mov Stud. 2012;11(2):161-176. doi: 10.1080/14742837.2012.664898. Epub 2012 Apr 2.
5
The Temporal Structure of Scientific Consensus Formation.
Am Sociol Rev. 2010 Dec 1;75(6):817-840. doi: 10.1177/0003122410388488.
7
The continued social transformation of the medical profession.
J Health Soc Behav. 2010;51 Suppl:S94-106. doi: 10.1177/0022146510383500.
8
Is risk-based regulation feasible? The case of polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs).
Risk Anal. 2011 Feb;31(2):266-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01500.x. Epub 2010 Sep 29.
9
Open notes: doctors and patients signing on.
Ann Intern Med. 2010 Jul 20;153(2):121-5. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-153-2-201007200-00008.
10
Polybrominated diphenyl ether (PBDE) flame retardants and thyroid hormone during pregnancy.
Environ Health Perspect. 2010 Oct;118(10):1444-9. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1001905. Epub 2010 Jun 11.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验