Cordner Alissa, Brown Phil
345 Boyer Ave., Whitman College, Department of Sociology.
Sociol Forum (Randolph N J). 2013 Sep;28(3). doi: 10.1111/socf.12034.
Science on emerging environmental health threats involves numerous ethical concerns related to scientific uncertainty about conducting, interpreting, communicating, and acting upon research findings, but the connections between ethical decision making and scientific uncertainty are under-studied in sociology. Under conditions of scientific uncertainty, researcher conduct is not fully prescribed by formal ethical codes of conduct, increasing the importance of ethical reflection by researchers, conflicts over research conduct, and reliance on informal ethical standards. This paper draws on in-depth interviews with scientists, regulators, activists, industry representatives, and fire safety experts to explore ethical considerations of using a case study of flame retardants, chemicals widely used in consumer products with potential negative health and environmental impacts. We focus on the uncertainty that arises in measuring people's exposure to these chemicals through testing of their personal environments or bodies. We identify four sources of ethical concerns relevant to scientific uncertainty: 1) choosing research questions or methods, 2) interpreting scientific results, 3) communicating results to multiple publics, and 4) applying results for policy-making. This research offers lessons about professional conduct under conditions of uncertainty, ethical research practice, democratization of scientific knowledge, and science's impact on policy.
关于新出现的环境健康威胁的科学涉及许多伦理问题,这些问题与开展、解释、传播研究结果以及根据研究结果采取行动时的科学不确定性有关,但在社会学领域,伦理决策与科学不确定性之间的联系尚未得到充分研究。在科学不确定性的情况下,正式的道德行为准则并不能完全规定研究人员的行为,这就增加了研究人员进行伦理反思、研究行为冲突以及对非正式道德标准的依赖的重要性。本文通过对科学家、监管者、活动家、行业代表和消防安全专家的深入访谈,以阻燃剂为例探讨伦理考量,阻燃剂是广泛用于消费品的化学物质,可能对健康和环境产生负面影响。我们关注的是在通过检测个人环境或身体来衡量人们接触这些化学物质时出现的不确定性。我们确定了与科学不确定性相关的四个伦理问题来源:1)选择研究问题或方法,2)解释科学结果,3)向多个公众群体传播结果,4)将结果应用于政策制定。这项研究提供了关于不确定性条件下的专业行为、伦理研究实践、科学知识民主化以及科学对政策影响的经验教训。