• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

客观结构化实践考试作为本科药理学学生实践技能形成性评估的工具。

Objective structured practical examination as a tool for the formative assessment of practical skills of undergraduate students in pharmacology.

作者信息

Malhotra Supriya D, Shah Kartik N, Patel Varsha J

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology, Smt. NHL Municipal Medical College, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.

出版信息

J Educ Health Promot. 2013 Sep 30;2:53. doi: 10.4103/2277-9531.119040. eCollection 2013.

DOI:10.4103/2277-9531.119040
PMID:24251289
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3826029/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Assessment for practical skills in medical education needs improvement from subjective methods to objective ones. An Objective Structured Practical Examination (OSPE) has been considered as one such method. This study is an attempt to evaluate the feasibility of using OSPE as a tool for the formative assessment of undergraduate medical education in pharmacology.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Students of second year MBBS, at the end of the first term, were assessed by both the conventional practical examination and the Objective Structured Practical Examination (OSPE). A five-station OSPE was conducted one week after the conventional examination. The scores obtained in both were compared and a Bland Altman plot was also used for comparison of the two methods. Perceptions of students regarding the new method were obtained using a questionnaire.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the mean scores between the two methods (P = 0.44) using the unpaired t test. The Bland Altman plot comparing the CPE (conventional practical examination) with the OSPE showed that 96% of the differences in the scores between OSPE and CPE were within the acceptable limit of 1.96 SD. Regarding the students' perceptions of OSPE compared to CPE, 73% responded that OSPE could partially or completely replace CPE. OSPE was judged as an objective and unbiased test as compared to CPE, by 66.4% of the students.

CONCLUSION

Use of OSPE is feasible for formative assessment in the undergraduate pharmacology curriculum.

摘要

引言

医学教育实践技能评估需要从主观方法向客观方法改进。客观结构化实践考试(OSPE)被认为是这样一种方法。本研究旨在评估将OSPE用作本科药理学医学教育形成性评估工具的可行性。

材料与方法

在第一学期末,对医学学士二年级的学生进行了传统实践考试和客观结构化实践考试(OSPE)。在传统考试一周后进行了一场有五个考站的OSPE。比较了两种考试获得的分数,并使用布兰德-奥特曼图对两种方法进行比较。通过问卷调查了解学生对新方法的看法。

结果

使用不成对t检验,两种方法的平均分数没有显著差异(P = 0.44)。比较传统实践考试(CPE)和OSPE的布兰德-奥特曼图显示,OSPE和CPE分数差异的96%在1.96标准差的可接受范围内。关于学生对OSPE与CPE的看法,73%的学生回答OSPE可以部分或完全取代CPE。66.4%的学生认为与CPE相比,OSPE是一种客观且无偏倚的考试。

结论

在本科药理学课程的形成性评估中使用OSPE是可行的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2619/3826029/c329dbd18139/JEHP-2-53-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2619/3826029/7f8b853a539e/JEHP-2-53-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2619/3826029/c329dbd18139/JEHP-2-53-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2619/3826029/7f8b853a539e/JEHP-2-53-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2619/3826029/c329dbd18139/JEHP-2-53-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Objective structured practical examination as a tool for the formative assessment of practical skills of undergraduate students in pharmacology.客观结构化实践考试作为本科药理学学生实践技能形成性评估的工具。
J Educ Health Promot. 2013 Sep 30;2:53. doi: 10.4103/2277-9531.119040. eCollection 2013.
2
Introducing objective structured practical examination as a method of learning and evaluation for undergraduate pharmacology.引入客观结构化实践考试作为本科药理学的一种学习和评估方法。
Indian J Pharmacol. 2016 Oct;48(Suppl 1):S47-S51. doi: 10.4103/0253-7613.193317.
3
Comparison of Objective Structured Practical Examination (OSPE) Versus Conventional Pathology Practical Examination Methods Among the Second-Year Medical Students-a Cross-sectional Study.二年级医学生客观结构化实践考试(OSPE)与传统病理学实践考试方法的比较——一项横断面研究
Med Sci Educ. 2020 Jul 10;30(3):1131-1135. doi: 10.1007/s40670-020-01025-9. eCollection 2020 Sep.
4
Implementation of Objective Structured Practical Examination in Formative Assessment for Undergraduate Practical Pharmacology.客观结构化实践考试在本科药理学实践形成性评估中的实施
Maedica (Bucur). 2021 Mar;16(1):64-74. doi: 10.26574/maedica.2020.16.1.64.
5
Objective Structured Practical Examination (OSPE) as a Tool for the Formative Assessment of Practical Skills in the Subject of Physiology: A Comparative Cross-Sectional Analysis.客观结构化实践考试(OSPE)作为生理学学科实践技能形成性评估工具的比较横断面分析
Cureus. 2023 Sep 28;15(9):e46104. doi: 10.7759/cureus.46104. eCollection 2023 Sep.
6
A trial of the objective structured practical examination in physiology at Melaka Manipal Medical College, India.印度马六甲马尼帕尔医学院生理学客观结构化实践考试的一项试验。
Adv Physiol Educ. 2009 Mar;33(1):21-3. doi: 10.1152/advan.90108.2008.
7
Assessment for learning with Objectively Structured Practical Examination in Biochemistry.生物化学客观结构化实践考试中的学习性评价。
Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2015 Aug;5(Suppl 1):S71-5. doi: 10.4103/2229-516X.162285.
8
Comparison of student performance by assessment through Objective Structured Practical Examination versus the Conventional Method for second year MBBS students in Microbiology.通过客观结构化实践考试与传统方法对医学学士二年级微生物学专业学生进行评估的学生成绩比较。
J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2020 Jul;8(3):121-126. doi: 10.30476/jamp.2020.86029.1210.
9
Development of a teaching module for parenteral drug administration and objective structured practical examination stations in pharmacology.开发一个用于非肠道给药的教学模块以及药理学客观结构化实践考试站。
Indian J Pharmacol. 2013 Nov-Dec;45(6):587-92. doi: 10.4103/0253-7613.121369.
10
Students’ performance of and perspective on an objective structured practical examination for the assessment of preclinical and practical skills in biomedical laboratory science students in Sweden: a 5-year longitudinal study.瑞典生物医学实验室科学专业学生的临床前和实践技能评估之客观结构化实践考试的学生表现和观点:一项 5 年纵向研究。
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2023;20:13. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2023.20.13. Epub 2023 Apr 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Attitude and level of satisfaction on objective structured practical examination and traditional practical examination among undergraduate nursing students.本科护理专业学生对客观结构化实践考试和传统实践考试的态度及满意度
J Educ Health Promot. 2024 Jul 5;13:178. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1511_23. eCollection 2024.
2
Assessment in Undergraduate Competency-Based Medical Education: A Systematic Review.本科医学教育能力本位评估:一项系统综述
Cureus. 2024 Apr 11;16(4):e58073. doi: 10.7759/cureus.58073. eCollection 2024 Apr.
3
Systematic review of assessment in undergraduate competency-based medical education and extrapolation of an assessment framework for Indian context - A study protocol.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing clinical communication skills in physicians: are the skills context specific or generalizable.评估医生的临床沟通技巧:这些技巧是因具体情境而异还是具有通用性?
BMC Med Educ. 2009 May 15;9:22. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-9-22.
2
Micro-OSCE for assessment of undergraduates.用于评估本科生的微型客观结构化临床考试
Indian Pediatr. 2004 Feb;41(2):159-63.
3
Skill based assessment.基于技能的评估。
本科基于能力的医学教育评估的系统评价及印度背景下评估框架的推断——一项研究方案
J Educ Health Promot. 2023 Jul 29;12:242. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1434_22. eCollection 2023.
4
Students’ performance of and perspective on an objective structured practical examination for the assessment of preclinical and practical skills in biomedical laboratory science students in Sweden: a 5-year longitudinal study.瑞典生物医学实验室科学专业学生的临床前和实践技能评估之客观结构化实践考试的学生表现和观点:一项 5 年纵向研究。
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2023;20:13. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2023.20.13. Epub 2023 Apr 6.
5
Medical students' perception on the usefulness of online formative assessment: A single-center, mixed-method, pilot study.医学生对在线形成性评估有用性的认知:一项单中心、混合方法的试点研究。
J Educ Health Promot. 2021 Jul 30;10:243. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1198_20. eCollection 2021.
6
Comparison of Objective Structured Practical Examination (OSPE) Versus Conventional Pathology Practical Examination Methods Among the Second-Year Medical Students-a Cross-sectional Study.二年级医学生客观结构化实践考试(OSPE)与传统病理学实践考试方法的比较——一项横断面研究
Med Sci Educ. 2020 Jul 10;30(3):1131-1135. doi: 10.1007/s40670-020-01025-9. eCollection 2020 Sep.
7
Implementation of Objective Structured Practical Examination in Formative Assessment for Undergraduate Practical Pharmacology.客观结构化实践考试在本科药理学实践形成性评估中的实施
Maedica (Bucur). 2021 Mar;16(1):64-74. doi: 10.26574/maedica.2020.16.1.64.
8
Dental students' concerns regarding OSPE and OSCE: a qualitative feedback for process improvement.牙科学生对客观结构化临床考试(OSPE)和客观结构化临床技能评估(OSCE)的担忧:关于改进流程的定性反馈
BDJ Open. 2017 Jun 9;3:17009. doi: 10.1038/bdjopen.2017.9. eCollection 2017.
9
Introducing objective structured practical examination as a method of learning and evaluation for undergraduate pharmacology.引入客观结构化实践考试作为本科药理学的一种学习和评估方法。
Indian J Pharmacol. 2016 Oct;48(Suppl 1):S47-S51. doi: 10.4103/0253-7613.193317.
BMJ. 2003 Mar 29;326(7391):703-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7391.703.
4
Assessment of students.学生评估。
BMJ. 1993 Jan 2;306(6869):51-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6869.51.
5
Objective structured clinical/practical examination (OSCE/OSPE).客观结构化临床/实践考试(OSCE/OSPE)。
J Postgrad Med. 1993 Apr-Jun;39(2):82-4.
6
Educational handbook for health personnel. Revised edition.卫生人员教育手册。修订版。
WHO Offset Publ. 1981(35):330 p..
7
Assessment of clinical competence using objective structured examination.使用客观结构化考试评估临床能力。
Br Med J. 1975 Feb 22;1(5955):447-51. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.5955.447.