The George Institute for Global Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2014 May;16(5):426-32. doi: 10.1111/dom.12238. Epub 2013 Dec 16.
The aim of this study was to assess associations between patient characteristics, intensification of blood glucose-lowering treatment through oral glucose-lowering therapy and/or insulin and effective glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes.
11 140 patients from the Action in Diabetes and Vascular disease: preterAx and diamicroN-MR Controlled Evaluation (ADVANCE) trial who were randomized to intensive glucose control or standard glucose control and followed up for a median of 5 years were categorized into two groups: effective glycaemic control [haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) ≤ 7.0% or a proportionate reduction in HbA1c over 10%] or ineffective glycaemic control (HbA1c > 7.0% and a proportionate reduction in HbA1c less than or equal to 10%). Therapeutic intensification was defined as addition of an oral glucose-lowering agent or commencement of insulin. Pooled logistic regression models examined the associations between patient factors, intensification and effective glycaemic control.
A total of 7768 patients (69.7%), including 3198 in the standard treatment group achieved effective glycaemic control. Compared to patients with ineffective control, patients with effective glycaemic control had shorter duration of diabetes and lower HbA1c at baseline and at the time of treatment intensification. Treatment intensification with addition of an oral agent or commencement of insulin was associated with a 107% [odds ratio, OR: 2.07 (95% confidence interval, CI: 1.95-2.20)] and 152% [OR: 2.52 (95% CI: 2.30-2.77)] greater chance of achieving effective glycaemic control, respectively. These associations were robust after adjustment for several baseline characteristics and not modified by the number of oral medications taken at the time of treatment intensification.
Effective glycaemic control was associated with treatment intensification at lower HbA1c levels at all stages of the disease course and in both arms of the ADVANCE trial.
本研究旨在评估患者特征、通过口服降糖药物和/或胰岛素强化血糖控制治疗与 2 型糖尿病有效血糖控制之间的关联。
将 ADVANCE 试验中 11140 名随机接受强化血糖控制或标准血糖控制治疗并随访中位数为 5 年的患者分为两组:有效血糖控制(糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)≤7.0%或 HbA1c 降低 10%以上)或无效血糖控制(HbA1c>7.0%且 HbA1c 降低比例≤10%)。治疗强化定义为添加口服降糖药物或开始使用胰岛素。汇总逻辑回归模型检查了患者因素、强化治疗与有效血糖控制之间的关联。
共有 7768 名患者(69.7%),包括标准治疗组的 3198 名患者达到有效血糖控制。与血糖控制无效的患者相比,血糖控制有效的患者糖尿病病程较短,基线和治疗强化时的 HbA1c 水平较低。添加口服药物或开始使用胰岛素进行治疗强化与有效血糖控制的机会分别增加 107%[比值比(OR):2.07(95%置信区间(CI):1.95-2.20)]和 152%[OR:2.52(95%CI:2.30-2.77)]。这些关联在调整了几个基线特征后仍然稳健,并且在治疗强化时服用的口服药物数量不会改变。
在疾病过程的各个阶段以及 ADVANCE 试验的两个治疗组中,有效血糖控制与较低的 HbA1c 水平下的治疗强化相关。