School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Nov 20;13:484. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-484.
Evidence from Australia and other countries suggests that some individuals struggle to meet the costs of their health care, including medicines, despite the presence of Government subsidies for low-income earners. The aim of our study was to elucidate women's experiences with the day to day expenses that relate to medicines and their health care.
The Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health (ALSWH) conducts regular surveys of women in three age cohorts (born 1973-78, 1946-51, and 1921-26). Our data were obtained from free text comments included in surveys 1 to 5 for each cohort. All comments were scanned for mentions of attitudes, beliefs and behaviours around the costs of medicines and health care. Relevant comments were coded by category and themes identified.
Over 150,000 responses were received to the surveys, and 42,305 (27%) of these responses included free-text comments; 379 were relevant to medicines and health care costs (from 319 individuals). Three broad themes were identified: costs of medicines (33% of relevant comments), doctor visits (49%), and complementary medicines (13%). Age-specific issues with medicine costs included contraceptive medicines (1973-78 cohort), hormone replacement therapy (1946-51 cohort) and osteoporosis medications (1921-26 cohort). Concerns about doctor visits mostly related to reduced (or no) access to bulk-billed medical services, where there are no out-of-pocket costs to the patient, and costs of specialist services. Some women in the 1973-78 and 1946-51 cohorts reported 'too much income' to qualify for government health benefits, but not enough to pay for visits to the doctor. In some cases, care and medicines were avoided because of the costs. Personal feelings of embarrassment over financial positions and judgments about bulk-billing practices ('good ones don't bulk-bill') were barriers to service use, as were travel expenses for rural women.
For some individuals, difficulty in accessing bulk-billing services and increasing out-of-pocket costs in Australia limit affordability of health services, including medications. At greatest risk may be those falling below thresholds for subsidised care such as self-funded retirees and those on low-middle incomes, in addition to those on very low incomes, who may find even small co-payments difficult to manage.
来自澳大利亚和其他国家的证据表明,尽管政府为低收入者提供了医疗补贴,但仍有一些人难以负担医疗费用,包括药品费用。我们的研究旨在阐明女性在与药品和医疗保健相关的日常开支方面的经历。
澳大利亚女性健康纵向研究(ALSWH)定期对三个年龄组(1973-78 年、1946-51 年和 1921-26 年出生的女性)的女性进行调查。我们的数据来自每个年龄组的前五次调查中的自由文本评论。所有评论都被扫描,以发现与药品和医疗保健费用相关的态度、信念和行为。对相关评论进行了分类,并确定了主题。
该调查共收到超过 15 万份回复,其中 27%(42305 份)的回复包含自由文本评论;379 份与药品和医疗保健费用相关(来自 319 个人)。确定了三个广泛的主题:药品费用(33%的相关评论)、医生就诊(49%)和补充药品(13%)。特定于年龄的药品费用问题包括避孕药(1973-78 年年龄组)、激素替代疗法(1946-51 年年龄组)和骨质疏松症药物(1921-26 年年龄组)。关于医生就诊的担忧主要涉及减少(或没有)获得全额报销的医疗服务的机会,因为患者无需支付自付费用,以及专科服务的费用。1973-78 年和 1946-51 年年龄组的一些女性报告说,她们的“收入过高”,没有资格获得政府医疗福利,但收入不足以支付看医生的费用。在某些情况下,由于费用问题,妇女避免了护理和用药。对财务状况的个人尴尬感以及对全额报销做法的判断(“好的不全额报销”)是服务使用的障碍,农村妇女的旅行费用也是障碍。
对于一些人来说,在澳大利亚,获得全额报销服务的困难和自付费用的增加限制了医疗服务的可负担性,包括药品。最有可能面临风险的是那些低于补贴护理门槛的人,例如自费退休人员和中低收入者,以及那些收入非常低的人,他们可能发现即使是小额共付额也难以管理。