Iacovelli Roberto, Verzoni Elena, De Braud Filippo, Procopio Giuseppe
Department of Medical Oncology; Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori; Milano, Italy; Department of Radiology, Oncology and Human Pathology PhD program; Sapienza University of Rome; Rome, Italy.
Department of Medical Oncology; Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori; Milano, Italy.
Cancer Biol Ther. 2014 Jan;15(1):19-21. doi: 10.4161/cbt.27150. Epub 2013 Nov 19.
Tyrosine kinase inhibitors are de facto the more used targeted therapies for upfront treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Among these, sunitinib and pazopanib have reported greater activity in term of progression-free survival and overall survival compared with interferon-α or placebo in two independent large phase III studies. Despite a large use in clinical practice these molecules had never been compared. The COMPARZ study recently published in the New England Journal of Medicine reports the results of a non-inferiority trial that comparing pazopanib to sunitinib as first line of therapy in mRCC patients. Here we report the activity and safety data of the study and we discuss several critical aspects related to the study design and possible confounding factors that may alter the results' interpretation.
酪氨酸激酶抑制剂实际上是转移性肾细胞癌(mRCC)一线治疗中使用较多的靶向疗法。其中,在两项独立的大型III期研究中,与干扰素-α或安慰剂相比,舒尼替尼和帕唑帕尼在无进展生存期和总生存期方面表现出更强的活性。尽管这些药物在临床实践中被大量使用,但从未进行过比较。最近发表在《新英格兰医学杂志》上的COMPARZ研究报告了一项非劣效性试验的结果,该试验比较了帕唑帕尼和舒尼替尼作为mRCC患者一线治疗的疗效。在此,我们报告该研究的活性和安全性数据,并讨论与研究设计相关的几个关键方面以及可能影响结果解释的混杂因素。