Çıtak Karakaya İlkim, Karakaya Mehmet Gürhan, Erğun Esra, Elmalı Sedanur, Fırat Tüzün
Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Muğla School of Health, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Muğla, Turkey.
Avicenna Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2014;27(2):197-201. doi: 10.3233/BMR-130436.
Pulse frequency is one of the key determinants of analgesic outcomes by transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS). However, optimal settings remain unclear.
To compare the effects of different frequencies of TENS, on pressure pain threshold and tolerance.
Currents with pulse duration of 110 μs, and pulse frequencies of 60 pps or 150 pps were applied on the volar aspects of the dominant forearms of 20 healthy volunteers, on two consecutive days, in a randomized order. Threshold and tolerance were measured at the beginning, after the 15th and 30th minutes of the applications, and 30 minutes after the applications.
Pressure pain threshold and tolerance values were higher at the 150 pps frequency, at all measurement times (p< 0.05). However, no frequencyXtime interaction and time-dependent changes were found for the outcome measures (p> 0.05).
These findings established that, at 150 pps conventional TENS, threshold and tolerance values were consistently higher. These results are presented to inform future research regarding optimal conventional TENS parameters and to provide support for clinical applications.
脉冲频率是经皮电刺激神经疗法(TENS)镇痛效果的关键决定因素之一。然而,最佳设置仍不明确。
比较不同频率的TENS对压力痛阈和耐痛阈的影响。
对20名健康志愿者优势前臂掌侧连续两天施加脉宽为110μs、脉冲频率为60次/秒或150次/秒的电流,施加顺序随机。在施加电流开始时、15分钟和30分钟后以及施加结束30分钟后测量痛阈和耐痛阈。
在所有测量时间点,150次/秒频率下的压力痛阈和耐痛阈均较高(p<0.05)。然而,结果测量未发现频率×时间交互作用及时程依赖性变化(p>0.05)。
这些研究结果表明,在150次/秒的传统TENS下,痛阈和耐痛阈始终较高。呈现这些结果是为了为未来关于最佳传统TENS参数的研究提供信息,并为临床应用提供支持。