Geubbels Noëlle, Bruin Sjoerd C, Acherman Yair I Z, van de Laar Arnold W J M, Hoen Marijke B, de Brauw L Maurits
Department of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery, Slotervaart Hospital, Louwesweg 6, 1066 EC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands,
Obes Surg. 2014 Mar;24(3):390-6. doi: 10.1007/s11695-013-1133-6.
Retrospective studies investigating fast track care involve selected patients. This study evaluates the implementation of fast track care in unselected bariatric patients in a high volume teaching hospital in the Netherlands.
Consecutive patients who underwent a primary laparoscopic gastric bypass in our center were reviewed in the years before (n = 104) and after implementation of fast track care (n = 360). Fast track involved the banning of tubes/catheters, anesthetic management and early ambulation. Primary outcome was the length of stay. Perioperative times, complications (<30 days), readmissions and prolonged length of stay were secondary outcomes.
The median length decreased after implementation of fast track (3 days versus 1 day, p < 0.001). Overall complication rate remained stable after implementation of fast track care (17.3 % versus 18.3 %, not significant). Readmission rate did not differ between groups (4.8 % conventional care versus 8.1 % fast track, not significant). More grades I-IVa complications occurred outside the hospital after the implementation of fast track care (24.8 % versus 51.5 %). Lower age (b = 0.118, 95 % CI: 0.002-0.049, p < 0.05) and the implementation of fast track (b = -0.270, 95 % CI: -1.969 to -0.832, p < 0.001) were the only factors that significantly shortened the length of stay.
Patients that received fast track care had a decreased length of stay. Although more complications occurred after discharge in the fast track care group, this did not lead to adverse outcomes. Fast track does enhance recovery and is suitable for unselected patients. Care providers should select their patients for early discharge and pursue a low threshold for readmission.
调查快速康复护理的回顾性研究涉及特定患者。本研究评估了荷兰一家大型教学医院对非特定肥胖症患者实施快速康复护理的情况。
回顾了在我们中心连续接受初次腹腔镜胃旁路手术的患者,分别为实施快速康复护理前(n = 104)和实施后(n = 360)的患者。快速康复包括禁止使用管道/导管、麻醉管理和早期活动。主要结局指标是住院时间。围手术期时间、并发症(<30天)、再入院率和住院时间延长为次要结局指标。
实施快速康复护理后,中位住院时间缩短(3天对1天,p < 0.001)。实施快速康复护理后总体并发症发生率保持稳定(17.3%对18.3%,无显著差异)。两组再入院率无差异(传统护理组为4.8%,快速康复组为8.1%,无显著差异)。实施快速康复护理后,更多I - IVa级并发症发生在院外(24.8%对51.5%)。年龄较小(b = 0.118,95%置信区间:0.002 - 0.049,p < 0.05)和实施快速康复护理(b = -0.270,95%置信区间:-1.969至-0.832,p < 0.001)是显著缩短住院时间的仅有的因素。
接受快速康复护理的患者住院时间缩短。尽管快速康复护理组出院后发生的并发症更多,但这并未导致不良结局。快速康复确实能促进康复,适用于非特定患者。护理人员应选择患者进行早期出院,并对再入院保持低门槛。