• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

如何制定基于表现的考试标准:AMEE 指南第 85 号。

How to set standards on performance-based examinations: AMEE Guide No. 85.

机构信息

FAIMER, Research and Data Resources , USA.

出版信息

Med Teach. 2014 Feb;36(2):97-110. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.853119. Epub 2013 Nov 20.

DOI:10.3109/0142159X.2013.853119
PMID:24256050
Abstract

This AMEE Guide offers an overview of methods used in determining passing scores for performance-based assessments. A consideration of various assessment purposes will provide context for discussion of standard setting methods, followed by a description of different types of standards that are typically set in health professions education. A step-by-step guide to the standard setting process will be presented. The Guide includes detailed explanations and examples of standard setting methods, and each section presents examples of research done using the method with performance-based assessments in health professions education. It is intended for use by those who are responsible for determining passing scores on tests and need a resource explaining methods for setting passing scores. The Guide contains a discussion of reasons for assessment, defines standards, and presents standard setting methods that have been researched with performance-based tests. The first section of the Guide addresses types of standards that are set. The next section provides guidance on preparing for a standard setting study. The following sections include conducting the meeting, selecting a method, implementing the passing score, and maintaining the standard. The Guide will support efforts to determine passing scores that are based on research, matched to the assessment purpose, and reproducible.

摘要

本 AMEE 指南概述了用于确定基于表现的评估及格分数的方法。对各种评估目的的考虑将为标准设定方法的讨论提供背景,然后描述通常在医疗保健专业教育中设定的不同类型的标准。将介绍标准设定过程的分步指南。本指南包括标准设定方法的详细解释和示例,每一节都介绍了在医疗保健专业教育中使用基于表现的评估进行该方法研究的示例。它旨在为负责确定测试及格分数并需要资源来解释设定及格分数方法的人员使用。本指南讨论了评估的原因,定义了标准,并介绍了已针对基于表现的测试进行研究的标准设定方法。指南的第一部分介绍了设定的标准类型。下一节提供了进行标准设定研究的指导。接下来的部分包括会议的进行、方法的选择、及格分数的实施以及标准的维护。本指南将支持基于研究、与评估目的相匹配且可重现的确定及格分数的努力。

相似文献

1
How to set standards on performance-based examinations: AMEE Guide No. 85.如何制定基于表现的考试标准:AMEE 指南第 85 号。
Med Teach. 2014 Feb;36(2):97-110. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.853119. Epub 2013 Nov 20.
2
Procedures for establishing defensible absolute passing scores on performance examinations in health professions education.在健康职业教育中为能力考核设定可靠绝对及格分数的程序。
Teach Learn Med. 2006 Winter;18(1):50-7. doi: 10.1207/s15328015tlm1801_11.
3
Setting and maintaining standards in multiple choice examinations: AMEE Guide No. 37.多项选择题考试中的标准设定与维持:医学教育与培训学会指南第37号
Med Teach. 2008;30(9-10):836-45. doi: 10.1080/01421590802402247.
4
A work-centered approach for setting passing scores on performance-based assessments.一种基于工作的方法来设定基于表现的评估的及格分数。
Eval Health Prof. 2005 Sep;28(3):349-69. doi: 10.1177/0163278705278282.
5
Using databases in medical education research: AMEE Guide No. 77.在医学教育研究中使用数据库:AMEE 指南第 77 号。
Med Teach. 2013 May;35(5):e1103-22. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.785632. Epub 2013 Apr 22.
6
Setting defensible performance standards on OSCEs and standardized patient examinations.制定客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)和标准化患者检查的合理性能标准。
Med Teach. 2003 May;25(3):245-9. doi: 10.1080/0142159031000100274.
7
A model for setting performance standards for standardized patient examinations.一种用于设定标准化患者检查绩效标准的模型。
Eval Health Prof. 2003 Dec;26(4):427-46. doi: 10.1177/0163278703258105.
8
Description and impact of using a standard-setting method for determining pass/fail scores in a surgery clerkship.在外科实习中使用标准设定方法确定及格/不及格分数的描述与影响。
Am J Surg. 2007 Feb;193(2):252-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.07.017.
9
Standard setting for progress tests: combining external and internal standards.进展测试的标准制定:结合外部标准和内部标准。
Med Educ. 2009 Jun;43(6):589-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03372.x.
10
'The research compass': an introduction to research in medical education: AMEE Guide no. 56.《研究指南针》:医学教育研究概论:AMEE 指南第 56 号。
Med Teach. 2011;33(9):695-709. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2011.595436.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Standard Setting Procedures to Establish Defensible Passing Standards for Clinical Skills Assessment: Angoff, Borderline Group, Contrasting Groups and Patient Safety Methods.用于建立临床技能评估可辩护及格标准的标准设定程序比较:安格夫法、临界组法、对比组法和患者安全法。
Clin Teach. 2025 Oct;22(5):e70198. doi: 10.1111/tct.70198.
2
Postgraduate Clinical Residency: The Impact of Multiple-Choice Question Quality on Exam Success Rates.研究生临床住院医师培训:选择题质量对考试成功率的影响。
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2025 Aug 6;16:1381-1397. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S525828. eCollection 2025.
3
Applying generalized theory to optimize the quality of high-stakes objective structured clinical examinations for undergraduate medical students: experience from the French medical school.
应用通用理论优化本科医学生高风险客观结构化临床考试的质量:来自法国医学院的经验
BMC Med Educ. 2025 May 2;25(1):643. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07255-y.
4
Investigating assessment standards and fixed passing marks in dental undergraduate finals: a mixed-methods approach.探究牙科本科期末考试的评估标准和固定及格分数:一种混合方法研究
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Apr 3;25(1):481. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-06944-y.
5
Consistency between inter-institutional panels using a three-level Angoff-standard setting in licensure tests of foreign-trained dentists in Sweden: A cohort study.瑞典对外籍牙医执照考试中使用三级安戈夫标准设定的机构间小组的一致性:一项队列研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 8;19(11):e0313476. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313476. eCollection 2024.
6
Cost management analysis of Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE): guide to the universities of medical sciences.客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)的成本管理分析:医学科学大学指南。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Oct 31;24(1):1241. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06264-7.
7
The design, implementation, and evaluation of a blended (in-person and virtual) Clinical Competency Examination for final-year nursing students.最终年制护理学生的混合(面对面和虚拟)临床能力考试的设计、实施和评估。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Aug 28;24(1):936. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05935-9.
8
Team-based learning (TBL) curriculum combined with video vignettes improves performance of undergraduate medical students on OSCE compared with TBL alone.团队学习(TBL)课程与视频小插曲相结合,可提高本科生在 OSCE 考试中的表现,优于单独使用 TBL。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Aug 12;24(1):866. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05861-w.
9
Tailoring support following summative assessments: a latent profile analysis of student outcomes across five medical specialities.总结性评估后的个性化支持:对五个医学专业学生成绩的潜在类别分析
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2025 Apr;30(2):459-473. doi: 10.1007/s10459-024-10357-9. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
10
Development and Implementation of an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) of the Subject of Surgery for Undergraduate Students in an Institution with Limited Resources.资源有限院校本科外科专业客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)的开发与实施
MedEdPublish (2016). 2021 Apr 21;10:97. doi: 10.15694/mep.2021.000097.1. eCollection 2021.