• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

团队学习(TBL)课程与视频小插曲相结合,可提高本科生在 OSCE 考试中的表现,优于单独使用 TBL。

Team-based learning (TBL) curriculum combined with video vignettes improves performance of undergraduate medical students on OSCE compared with TBL alone.

机构信息

Centre Universitaire d'Enseignement par Simulation - CUESim, Virtual Hospital of Lorraine, Faculty of Medicine, Midwifery and Health Professions, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, F- 54000, France.

Faculty of Medicine, Midwifery and Health Professions, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, F- 54000, France.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2024 Aug 12;24(1):866. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05861-w.

DOI:10.1186/s12909-024-05861-w
PMID:39135004
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11318197/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clinical practitioners think of frequent causes of diseases first rather than expending resources searching for rare conditions. However, it is important to continue investigating when all common illnesses have been discarded. Undergraduate medical students must acquire skills to listen and ask relevant questions when seeking a potential diagnosis.

METHODOLOGY

Our objective was to determine whether team-based learning (TBL) focused on clinical reasoning in the context of rare diseases combined with video vignettes (intervention) improved the clinical and generic skills of students compared with TBL alone (comparator). We followed a single-center quasi-experimental posttest-only design involving fifth-year medical students.

RESULTS

The intervention group (n = 178) had a significantly higher mean overall score on the objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) (12.04 ± 2.54 vs. 11.27 ± 3.16; P = 0.021) and a higher mean percentage score in clinical skills (47.63% vs. 44.63%; P = 0.025) and generic skills (42.99% vs. 40.33%; P = 0.027) than the comparator group (n = 118). Success on the OSCE examination was significantly associated with the intervention (P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

The TBL with video vignettes curriculum was associated with better performance of medical students on the OSCE. The concept presented here may be beneficial to other teaching institutions.

摘要

背景

临床医生首先考虑疾病的常见原因,而不是花费资源寻找罕见病症。然而,当所有常见疾病都被排除后,继续调查是很重要的。医学生必须掌握在寻找潜在诊断时倾听和提出相关问题的技能。

方法

我们的目的是确定以罕见病为背景的以团队为基础的学习(TBL)结合视频小插曲(干预组)是否比单独进行 TBL(对照组)更能提高学生的临床和通用技能。我们遵循了一项单中心准实验性仅后测设计,涉及五年级医学生。

结果

干预组(n=178)在客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)中的总体平均得分(12.04±2.54 分比 11.27±3.16 分;P=0.021)和临床技能(47.63%比 44.63%;P=0.025)和通用技能(42.99%比 40.33%;P=0.027)的平均分均显著高于对照组(n=118)。OSCE 考试的成功与干预显著相关(P=0.002)。

结论

TBL 与视频小插曲课程与医学生在 OSCE 上的更好表现相关。这里提出的概念可能对其他教学机构有益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/135e/11318197/ff05bece5874/12909_2024_5861_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/135e/11318197/f33eda9b878e/12909_2024_5861_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/135e/11318197/855e9b60d32b/12909_2024_5861_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/135e/11318197/ff05bece5874/12909_2024_5861_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/135e/11318197/f33eda9b878e/12909_2024_5861_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/135e/11318197/855e9b60d32b/12909_2024_5861_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/135e/11318197/ff05bece5874/12909_2024_5861_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Team-based learning (TBL) curriculum combined with video vignettes improves performance of undergraduate medical students on OSCE compared with TBL alone.团队学习(TBL)课程与视频小插曲相结合,可提高本科生在 OSCE 考试中的表现,优于单独使用 TBL。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Aug 12;24(1):866. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05861-w.
2
Team-based learning, a learning strategy for clinical reasoning, in students with problem-based learning tutorial experiences.基于团队的学习,一种针对临床推理的学习策略,适用于有基于问题的学习教程经验的学生。
Tohoku J Exp Med. 2012 May;227(1):23-9. doi: 10.1620/tjem.227.23.
3
Team-based learning versus traditional didactic lectures in teaching clinical biochemistry at King Abdulaziz University; learning outcomes and student satisfaction.团队学习与传统讲授法在阿卜杜勒阿齐兹国王大学临床生物化学教学中的比较;学习成果和学生满意度。
Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2021 Jul;49(4):546-559. doi: 10.1002/bmb.21501. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
4
Video-based, student tutor- versus faculty staff-led ultrasound course for medical students - a prospective randomized study.基于视频的,医学生学生导师与教职员工主导的超声课程 - 一项前瞻性随机研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Dec 16;20(1):512. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02431-8.
5
Tackling student neurophobia in neurosciences block with team-based learning.通过基于团队的学习解决神经科学课程中学生的神经恐惧症。
Med Educ Online. 2015 Jul 30;20:28461. doi: 10.3402/meo.v20.28461. eCollection 2015.
6
Introduction of team-based learning improves understanding of glucose metabolism in biochemistry among undergraduate students.团队学习法有助于提高大学生对生物化学中葡萄糖代谢的理解。
Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2021 May;49(3):383-391. doi: 10.1002/bmb.21485. Epub 2020 Dec 30.
7
A randomised controlled trial study on the effectiveness of high-fidelity simulation in enhancing skills among undergraduate medical students.一项关于高保真模拟在提高本科生医学生技能方面的有效性的随机对照试验研究。
Med J Malaysia. 2024 Jul;79(4):421-428.
8
The outcomes of team-based learning vs small group interactive learning in the obstetrics and gynecology course for undergraduate students.团队学习与小组互动学习在妇产科本科课程中的效果比较。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2024 Jun;103(6):1224-1230. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14804. Epub 2024 Feb 17.
9
Team-based learning (TBL) in the medical curriculum: better than PBL?医学课程中的团队学习(TBL):比 PBL 更好?
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Dec 8;17(1):243. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-1068-z.
10
Integrating Standardized Multimedia to Supplement Physical Examination Curriculum: An Assessment of Medical Student and Evaluator Perspective.整合标准化多媒体补充体检课程:医学生和评估者视角的评估。
S D Med. 2022 Oct;75(10):452.

引用本文的文献

1
Team based learning pedagogy enhances the education quality: a systematic review and meta-analysis.基于团队的学习教学法提高教育质量:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Apr 21;25(1):580. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07175-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Training framework for high-stakes OSCE: Experience from volunteer standardized patients' bank.高风险 OSCE 培训框架:志愿者标准化患者库的经验。
Clin Teach. 2024 Dec;21(6):e13787. doi: 10.1111/tct.13787. Epub 2024 May 29.
2
The benefits of using atypical presentations and rare diseases in problem-based learning in undergraduate medical education.在本科医学教育中使用非典型表现和罕见疾病进行基于问题的学习的好处。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Feb 6;23(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04079-6.
3
Rare Disease Education Outside of the Classroom and Clinic: Evaluation of the RARE Compassion Program for Undergraduate Medical Students.
罕见病教育:课堂外与临床外——本科医学生 RARE 共情项目评估。
Genes (Basel). 2022 Sep 23;13(10):1707. doi: 10.3390/genes13101707.
4
Pass/fail decisions and standards: the impact of differential examiner stringency on OSCE outcomes.通过/失败决策和标准:不同主考人严格程度对客观结构化临床考试结果的影响。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2022 May;27(2):457-473. doi: 10.1007/s10459-022-10096-9. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
5
Are rare diseases overlooked by medical education? Awareness of rare diseases among physicians in Poland: an explanatory study.罕见病是否被医学教育所忽视?波兰医生对罕见病的认知:一项解释性研究。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2021 Sep 28;16(1):400. doi: 10.1186/s13023-021-02023-9.
6
Career-computer simulation increases perceived importance of learning about rare diseases.职业-计算机模拟增加了对罕见病学习的重要性认知。
BMC Med Educ. 2021 May 17;21(1):279. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02688-7.
7
Call for improvement in medical school training in genetics: results of a national survey.呼吁改进医学院遗传学培训:全国调查结果。
Genet Med. 2021 Jun;23(6):1151-1157. doi: 10.1038/s41436-021-01100-5. Epub 2021 Feb 12.
8
Team-based learning: design, facilitation and participation.团队学习:设计、促进和参与。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Dec 3;20(Suppl 2):461. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02287-y.
9
The Effective Use of Videos in Medical Education.视频在医学教育中的有效应用。
Acad Med. 2020 Jun;95(6):970. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003056.
10
Setting defensible standards in small cohort OSCEs: Understanding better when borderline regression can 'work'.在小型队列客观结构化临床考试中设定合理的标准:更好地理解临界回归何时“有效”。
Med Teach. 2020 Mar;42(3):306-315. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2019.1681388. Epub 2019 Oct 26.