• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[血管内皮生长因子在糖尿病冠状动脉搭桥患者桡动脉中的表达及定位]

[Expression and localization of vascular endothelial growth factor in the radial artery of the coronary artery bypass grafting patients with diabetes].

作者信息

Chen Wen, Zou Liang, Zhu Yi-fan, Wang Xiao-di, Qi Yong-chao, Li Liang-peng, Chen Xin

机构信息

Department of Thoracic & Cardiovascular Surgery, Nanjing Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210006, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Jul;51(7):623-6.

PMID:24256589
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the quality of the radial artery for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) from patients with diabetes by observing the morphology of the radial artery and detecting the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) which may attribute to the long-term patency rate of the coronary artery bypass grafting.

METHODS

Samples from 20 cases of diabetic and non-diabetic patients were prospective collected from June 2009 to December 2010. HE staining technique was used to test the morphology of radial artery through the observation of 20 cases of diabetic and 20 cases of non-diabetic patients who undergone CABG. The intimal thicken of the radial artery in the two groups of patients was compared. Western blot and immunofluorescence were then used to test the expression and location of VEGF in the two groups of patients.

RESULTS

The radial artery endothelial thickening index and intima/media ratio were significantly higher in the diabetic patients when compared with non-diabetic patients (0.90 ± 0.28 vs. 0.29 ± 0.25, t = 7.27, P < 0.01; 0.90 ± 0.21 vs. 0.37 ± 0.18, t = 8.57, P < 0.01). The expression of VEGF in diabetic patients was significantly higher than non-diabetic patients as revealed by Western blot (1.20 ± 0.21 vs. 0.67 ± 0.15, t = 6.49, P < 0.01). Immunofluorescence showed that VEGF distributed in the cytoplasm of the endothelial cells of diabetic patients radial artery.

CONCLUSIONS

Diabetic patient's radial artery intimal thickness is significantly higher than non-diabetic patient's. VEGF may be an important inflammatory cytokine which is leading the radial artery intima thickening in the diabetic patients. The choice of the radial artery grafts in diabetic patients for CABG should be careful.

摘要

目的

通过观察糖尿病患者桡动脉的形态,并检测可能影响冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)长期通畅率的血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)的表达,来评估糖尿病患者用于冠状动脉旁路移植术的桡动脉质量。

方法

前瞻性收集2009年6月至2010年12月20例糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者的样本。通过对20例接受CABG的糖尿病患者和20例非糖尿病患者进行观察,采用苏木精-伊红(HE)染色技术检测桡动脉的形态。比较两组患者桡动脉的内膜增厚情况。然后采用蛋白质免疫印迹法和免疫荧光法检测两组患者VEGF的表达及定位。

结果

与非糖尿病患者相比,糖尿病患者桡动脉内皮增厚指数和内膜/中膜比值显著更高(0.90±0.28对0.29±0.25,t=7.27,P<0.01;0.90±0.21对0.37±0.18,t=8.57,P<0.01)。蛋白质免疫印迹法显示,糖尿病患者VEGF的表达显著高于非糖尿病患者(1.20±0.21对0.67±0.15,t=6.49,P<0.01)。免疫荧光显示,VEGF分布于糖尿病患者桡动脉内皮细胞的细胞质中。

结论

糖尿病患者的桡动脉内膜厚度显著高于非糖尿病患者。VEGF可能是导致糖尿病患者桡动脉内膜增厚的一种重要炎性细胞因子。糖尿病患者行CABG时,桡动脉移植物的选择应谨慎。

相似文献

1
[Expression and localization of vascular endothelial growth factor in the radial artery of the coronary artery bypass grafting patients with diabetes].[血管内皮生长因子在糖尿病冠状动脉搭桥患者桡动脉中的表达及定位]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Jul;51(7):623-6.
2
[Expression and localization of the nuclear factor-κB classical signaling pathway in the radial artery of diabetic patients].[核因子-κB经典信号通路在糖尿病患者桡动脉中的表达及定位]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Aug;52(8):617-21.
3
Comparative study on the histomorphology and molecular biology of radial artery conduits in patients with diabetes mellitus who underwent coronary bypass surgery.糖尿病患者冠状动脉旁路移植术中桡动脉导管的组织形态学和分子生物学比较研究。
Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2013 May;10(3):208-15. doi: 10.1177/1479164112456310. Epub 2012 Sep 12.
4
[Comparative study on the ultrastructure of radial artery in elderly patients underwent coronary artery bypass grafting with diabetes mellitus].老年糖尿病患者冠状动脉搭桥术后桡动脉超微结构的对比研究
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2011 Dec;49(12):1109-13.
5
The long-term impact of diabetes on graft patency after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: a substudy of the multicenter Radial Artery Patency Study.糖尿病对冠状动脉旁路移植术后移植物通畅率的长期影响:多中心桡动脉通畅性研究的一项子研究
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Oct;148(4):1246-53; discussion 1253. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.06.057. Epub 2014 Jul 17.
6
The second best arterial graft: a propensity analysis of the radial artery versus the free right internal thoracic artery to bypass the circumflex coronary artery.第二条最佳动脉移植物:桡动脉与游离右内乳动脉旁路回旋支冠状动脉的倾向分析。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Jan;147(1):133-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.08.040. Epub 2013 Oct 5.
7
Survival and graft patency after coronary artery bypass grafting with coronary endarterectomy: role of arterial versus vein conduits.冠状动脉内膜切除术冠状动脉搭桥术后的生存情况及移植血管通畅率:动脉与静脉移植物的作用
Ann Thorac Surg. 2007 Jul;84(1):25-31. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.02.053.
8
[Pathological changes of radial artery used for coronary artery bypass grafting and its related risk factors for intimal hyperplasia].[冠状动脉旁路移植术中使用的桡动脉病理变化及其内膜增生相关危险因素]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2006 Jan 15;44(2):83-6.
9
Optimal conduit for diabetic patients: propensity analysis of radial and right internal thoracic arteries.糖尿病患者的最佳血管移植物:桡动脉和右内乳动脉的倾向性分析。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Jul;98(1):30-6; discussion 36-7. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.03.044. Epub 2014 May 28.
10
Treatment of complex coronary artery disease in patients with diabetes: 5-year results comparing outcomes of bypass surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention in the SYNTAX trial.糖尿病患者复杂冠状动脉疾病的治疗:SYNTAX 试验比较旁路手术和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 5 年结果。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013 May;43(5):1006-13. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezt017. Epub 2013 Feb 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Identification of plasma vascular endothelia-cadherin as a biomarker for coronary artery disease in Type 2 diabetes mellitus patients.鉴定血浆血管内皮钙黏蛋白作为2型糖尿病患者冠状动脉疾病的生物标志物。
Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 Oct 15;8(10):19466-70. eCollection 2015.