Suppr超能文献

通过尿道压力反射测定法评估非索罗定对压力性尿失禁女性尿道闭合功能的影响。

Effect of fesoterodine on urethral closure function in women with stress urinary incontinence assessed by urethral pressure reflectometry.

作者信息

Klarskov Niels, Darekar Amanda, Scholfield David, Whelan Laurence, Lose Gunnar

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Herlev Hospital, Herlev Ringvej 75, Herlev, Denmark,

出版信息

Int Urogynecol J. 2014 Jun;25(6):755-60. doi: 10.1007/s00192-013-2269-6. Epub 2013 Nov 21.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

The aim was to evaluate, using urethral pressure reflectometry (UPR), the effect of fesoterodine on urethral function in women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI).

METHODS

Women aged 18 to 65 years were eligible for this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study if they had had clinically significant SUI or SUI-predominant mixed urinary incontinence for >3 months. Each participant received fesoterodine 4 mg, fesoterodine 8 mg, and placebo once daily for 7 days, with a 7- to 10-day washout between treatments. UPR was performed at baseline and 4 to 8 h after the last dose in each treatment period. Participants completed a 3-day bladder diary before randomisation and during the last 3 days of each treatment period.

RESULTS

Of the 22 women randomly assigned and treated, 17 met the criteria for the primary efficacy analyses. No statistically significant differences were seen between fesoterodine 4 mg or fesoterodine 8 mg and placebo in opening urethral pressure (primary endpoint) or other UPR endpoints. No statistically significant differences were seen between either fesoterodine dose and placebo in the change from baseline in the bladder diary variables (total urinary incontinence, SUI, or urgency urinary incontinence episodes per 24 h). Adverse events were reported by 8 participants taking fesoterodine 4 mg, 17 taking fesoterodine 8 mg, and 8 taking placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

Fesoterodine did not affect urethral pressure or significantly decrease the number of incontinence episodes in women with SUI. The UPR parameters showed no placebo effect, while there was a placebo effect of 60 % based on the bladder diary.

摘要

引言与假设

目的是使用尿道压力反射测定法(UPR)评估非索罗定对压力性尿失禁(SUI)女性尿道功能的影响。

方法

年龄在18至65岁之间、患有临床显著SUI或以SUI为主的混合性尿失禁超过3个月的女性符合本随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、交叉研究的条件。每位参与者每日服用一次4毫克非索罗定、8毫克非索罗定和安慰剂,持续7天,治疗之间有7至10天的洗脱期。在每个治疗期的基线以及最后一剂药物服用后4至8小时进行UPR检测。参与者在随机分组前以及每个治疗期的最后3天完成一份为期3天的膀胱日记。

结果

在随机分配并接受治疗的22名女性中,17名符合主要疗效分析的标准。4毫克非索罗定或8毫克非索罗定与安慰剂在开放尿道压力(主要终点)或其他UPR终点方面未见统计学显著差异。在膀胱日记变量(每24小时的总尿失禁、SUI或急迫性尿失禁发作次数)自基线的变化方面,两种非索罗定剂量与安慰剂之间均未见统计学显著差异。服用4毫克非索罗定的8名参与者、服用8毫克非索罗定的17名参与者以及服用安慰剂的8名参与者报告了不良事件。

结论

非索罗定不影响SUI女性的尿道压力,也未显著减少尿失禁发作次数。UPR参数未显示安慰剂效应,而基于膀胱日记则有60%的安慰剂效应。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验