Center for Cognitive Neuroscience and Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, and Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3UD, United Kingdom.
J Neurosci. 2013 Nov 20;33(47):18438-47. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3308-13.2013.
Attention, the prioritization of goal-relevant stimuli, and expectation, the modulation of stimulus processing by probabilistic context, represent the two main endogenous determinants of visual cognition. Neural selectivity in visual cortex is enhanced for both attended and expected stimuli, but the functional relationship between these mechanisms is poorly understood. Here, we adjudicated between two current hypotheses of how attention relates to predictive processing, namely, that attention either enhances or filters out perceptual prediction errors (PEs), the PE-promotion model versus the PE-suppression model. We acquired fMRI data from category-selective visual regions while human subjects viewed expected and unexpected stimuli that were either attended or unattended. Then, we trained multivariate neural pattern classifiers to discriminate expected from unexpected stimuli, depending on whether these stimuli had been attended or unattended. If attention promotes PEs, then this should increase the disparity of neural patterns associated with expected and unexpected stimuli, thus enhancing the classifier's ability to distinguish between the two. In contrast, if attention suppresses PEs, then this should reduce the disparity between neural signals for expected and unexpected percepts, thus impairing classifier performance. We demonstrate that attention greatly enhances a neural pattern classifier's ability to discriminate between expected and unexpected stimuli in a region- and stimulus category-specific fashion. These findings are incompatible with the PE-suppression model, but they strongly support the PE-promotion model, whereby attention increases the precision of prediction errors. Our results clarify the relationship between attention and expectation, casting attention as a mechanism for accelerating online error correction in predicting task-relevant visual inputs.
注意,目标相关刺激的优先级和预期,即概率上下文对刺激处理的调制,代表了视觉认知的两个主要内源性决定因素。视觉皮层的神经选择性增强了注意力和预期的刺激,但这些机制之间的功能关系尚不清楚。在这里,我们对注意与预测处理的关系的两种当前假设进行了裁决,即注意要么增强还是过滤感知预测误差(PE),PE 促进模型与 PE 抑制模型。我们在人类受试者观看预期和意外刺激时,从类别选择性视觉区域获取 fMRI 数据,这些刺激既可以被注意也可以不被注意。然后,我们训练多元神经模式分类器根据这些刺激是被注意还是未被注意,来区分预期和意外的刺激。如果注意促进了 PEs,那么这应该增加与预期和意外刺激相关的神经模式的差异,从而提高分类器区分两者的能力。相反,如果注意抑制了 PEs,那么这应该减少预期和意外感知之间的神经信号差异,从而损害分类器的性能。我们证明,注意以区域和刺激类别特异性的方式极大地增强了神经模式分类器区分预期和意外刺激的能力。这些发现与 PE 抑制模型不一致,但强烈支持 PE 促进模型,即注意增加了预测误差的精度。我们的结果阐明了注意与预期之间的关系,将注意作为加速预测任务相关视觉输入的在线错误校正的机制。