Buckley Mitchell S, Harinstein Lisa M, Clark Kimberly B, Smithburger Pamela L, Eckhardt Doug J, Alexander Earnest, Devabhakthuni Sandeep, Westley Craig A, David Butch, Kane-Gill Sandra L
Banner Good Samaritan Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Ann Pharmacother. 2013 Dec;47(12):1599-610. doi: 10.1177/1060028013507428. Epub 2013 Oct 15.
Medication errors are common upon hospital admission. Clinical pharmacist involvement in medication reconciliation is effective in identifying and rectifying medication errors. However, data is lacking on the economic impact, time requirements, and severity of errors resolved by clinical pharmacists.
To determine the incidence of unintended admission medication discrepancies resolved by clinical pharmacists. Secondary objectives were to determine the type of discrepancies, potential severity, proximal cause, and economic impact of this clinical pharmacy program.
This was a single-center, prospective, observational study conducted at a major teaching medical institution. Following institutional review board approval, data collection was conducted over a 4-week period (August 22, 2011, to September 16, 2011). Descriptive statistical methods were performed for all data analyses.
A total of 517 patients involving 5006 medications were included in this study. More than 25% (n = 132) of patients had at least 1 error associated with a medication ordered on hospital admission. Pharmacists resolved a total of 467 admission medication errors (3.5 ± 2.3 errors/patient). The most common type of medication error resolved was medication omission (79.6%). In regard to severity, 46% of medication errors were considered significant or serious. Overall, the mean total time was 44.4 ± 21.8 minutes per medication reconciliation. This clinical pharmacy program was estimated to carry a net present value of $5.7 million over 5 years.
Clinical pharmacist involvement within a multidisciplinary health care team during the admission medication reconciliation process demonstrated a significant improvement in patient safety and an economic benefit.
入院时用药错误很常见。临床药师参与用药核对对于识别和纠正用药错误是有效的。然而,关于临床药师解决的用药错误的经济影响、时间要求和错误严重程度的数据尚缺乏。
确定临床药师解决的意外入院用药差异的发生率。次要目的是确定差异的类型、潜在严重程度、近端原因以及该临床药学项目的经济影响。
这是一项在一家大型教学医疗机构进行的单中心、前瞻性观察性研究。经机构审查委员会批准后,在4周时间内(2011年8月22日至2011年9月16日)进行数据收集。所有数据分析均采用描述性统计方法。
本研究共纳入517例患者,涉及5006种药物。超过25%(n = 132)的患者在入院时所开药物至少有1个错误。药师共解决了467例入院用药错误(平均每位患者3.5 ± 2.3个错误)。解决的最常见用药错误类型是漏服药物(79.6%)。在严重程度方面,46%的用药错误被认为是重大或严重的。总体而言,每次用药核对的平均总时间为44.4 ± 21.8分钟。据估计,该临床药学项目在5年内的净现值为570万美元。
在入院用药核对过程中,临床药师参与多学科医疗团队显示出患者安全性有显著改善且具有经济效益。