University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics.
Ann Pharmacother. 2013 Sep;47(9):1218-22. doi: 10.1177/1060028013503131.
To describe 2 cases of clinically significant phenytoin removal during continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) and review the relevant literature regarding phenytoin removal by renal replacement modalities.
A 64-year-old female with chronic kidney disease and cirrhosis was admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with a traumatic subdural hematoma and seizures. The patient received a loading dose of intravenous phenytoin 1000 mg, followed by maintenance intravenous administration of phenytoin 100 mg and levetiracetam 250 mg every 12 hours. CVVH was initiated for acidosis. A 63-year-old male was admitted to the ICU after cardiac surgery complicated by hypotension. CVVH was initiated for fluid overload, and phenytoin was initiated 3 days later for seizures. A loading dose of intravenous phenytoin 2700 mg was administered, followed by maintenance dosing of intravenous phenytoin 150 mg every 8 hours. Concentrations of unbound phenytoin in serum and CVVH effluent samples were measured during concomitant treatment in each patient. In both patients, serum and effluent concentrations of unbound phenytoin fell steadily while they were on CVVH. Clearance of phenytoin by CVVH was calculated, as was the daily removal of phenytoin, as a percentage of total daily phenytoin dosage during each sampling period. Phenytoin clearance by CVVH ranged from 11 to 13 mL/min in these patients.
The clearance of phenytoin with CVVH in these 2 patients was much higher than the renal clearance of phenytoin reported in healthy volunteers with normal renal function. Previous case reports have demonstrated that only small, clinically insignificant amounts of phenytoin are removed by hemodialysis, and the only published report of phenytoin removal by continuous renal replacement therapy used hemofiltration rates much lower than those used in the 2 cases described here.
These cases demonstrate that a substantial amount-approximately 30%-of total daily phenytoin dose may be removed by CVVH, and patients may require higher than expected empiric doses. Phenytoin concentrations should be closely monitored in critically ill patients receiving CVVH.
描述 2 例在连续静脉-静脉血液滤过(CVVH)过程中出现临床显著苯妥英钠清除的病例,并复习关于肾脏替代治疗方式下苯妥英钠清除的相关文献。
一名 64 岁女性,患有慢性肾脏病和肝硬化,因创伤性硬脑膜下血肿和癫痫发作而被收入重症监护病房(ICU)。患者接受了静脉注射苯妥英钠负荷剂量 1000mg,随后以静脉注射苯妥英钠 100mg 和左乙拉西坦 250mg 的维持剂量,每 12 小时给药一次。因酸中毒而开始进行 CVVH。一名 63 岁男性,因心脏手术后低血压而被收入 ICU。因液体超负荷而开始进行 CVVH,并在 3 天后因癫痫发作而开始使用苯妥英钠。给予静脉注射苯妥英钠负荷剂量 2700mg,随后以静脉注射苯妥英钠 150mg 的维持剂量,每 8 小时给药一次。在每个患者的联合治疗期间测量了血清和 CVVH 流出样本中未结合苯妥英钠的浓度。在这两名患者中,当他们接受 CVVH 治疗时,血清和流出物中未结合的苯妥英钠浓度持续下降。计算了 CVVH 对苯妥英钠的清除率,以及在每个采样期间以苯妥英钠总日剂量的百分比计算的苯妥英钠每日清除率。这两名患者的 CVVH 对苯妥英钠的清除率范围为 11 至 13ml/min。
这 2 名患者的 CVVH 对苯妥英钠的清除率明显高于肾功能正常的健康志愿者中报告的肾清除率。以前的病例报告表明,血液透析只能去除少量的、临床上无意义的苯妥英钠,而唯一一份关于连续性肾脏替代治疗中苯妥英钠去除的已发表报告使用的是比这里描述的 2 个病例低得多的血液滤过率。
这些病例表明,大量的(约 30%)苯妥英钠总日剂量可能通过 CVVH 去除,因此患者可能需要比预期更高的经验性剂量。接受 CVVH 的危重症患者应密切监测苯妥英钠浓度。