Drabek Marcin, Merecz Dorota
Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine/Instytut Medycyny Pracy im. prof. J. Nofera, Lodz, Poland.
Med Pr. 2013;64(3):283-96.
The results of our research broaden the knowledge concerning the correlates of mobbing. The study is aimed at finding out whether an employee's gender, his/her occupational position and level of occupational stress are related to bullying experience.
1313 employees of a transport company participated in the study. The relationships between gender, occupational position, the level of stress and bullying were analysed. Bullying was measured by the use of the MD)M Questionnaire, while work environment was assessed using the Subjective Assessment of Work Questionnaire.
It was found that women were generally more exposed to bullying than men (Z = -1.999; p < 0.05). Women experienced more bullying by their colleagues than men did (Z = -2.712; p < 0.01), in particular: bullying by colleagues that destroys the worker's image (Z = -2.922; p < 0.01) and bullying by colleagues that destroys social relations (Z = -3.004; p < 0.01). Individuals with managerial jobs experienced overall bullying (Z = -2.762; p < 0.01), bullying by colleagues (Z = -0.014; p < 0.05) and bullying by colleagues that destroys social relations (Z = -2.260; p < 0.05) more often than the individuals with non-management positions. The results of the study also indicated that employees with higher level of stress in comparison with less stressed co-workers reported more incidents of bullying behaviour (overall bullying--Z = -8.171; p < 0.001, bullying by colleagues - Z = -7.114; p < 0.001, bullying by supervisors--Z = -6.716; p < 0.001, all types of behaviour - p < 0.001).
Comparing the results of our study to the previous research, it seems that the pattern of relationships between individual characteristics and bullying is rooted in the wider cultural context, the specificity of the company, its organisational culture as well as its situation. Therefore it's difficult to talk about irrefutable individual correlates of bullying at work.
我们的研究结果拓宽了关于职场暴力相关因素的知识。该研究旨在查明员工的性别、职业地位和职业压力水平是否与受欺凌经历有关。
一家运输公司的1313名员工参与了该研究。分析了性别、职业地位、压力水平与职场暴力之间的关系。使用MD)M问卷测量职场暴力,同时使用工作主观评估问卷评估工作环境。
发现女性总体上比男性更容易受到职场暴力侵害(Z = -1.999;p < 0.05)。女性比男性更多地受到同事的职场暴力侵害(Z = -2.712;p < 0.01),特别是:同事破坏员工形象的职场暴力(Z = -2.922;p < 0.01)以及同事破坏社会关系的职场暴力(Z = -3.004;p < 0.01)。担任管理职务的个体比非管理职务的个体更频繁地经历总体职场暴力(Z = -2.762;p < 0.01)、同事的职场暴力(Z = -0.014;p < 0.05)以及同事破坏社会关系的职场暴力(Z = -2.260;p < 0.05)。研究结果还表明,与压力较小的同事相比,压力水平较高的员工报告的职场暴力行为事件更多(总体职场暴力——Z = -8.171;p < 0.001,同事的职场暴力——Z = -7.114;p < 0.001,上级的职场暴力——Z = -6.716;p < 0.001,所有类型行为——p < 0.001)。
将我们的研究结果与先前的研究进行比较,似乎个体特征与职场暴力之间的关系模式植根于更广泛的文化背景、公司的特殊性、其组织文化以及其状况。因此,很难谈论工作场所职场暴力无可争议的个体相关因素。